The concerns were raised during hearings based on the Auditor General’s report for the financial year ending June 30, 2025. The sessions were held on June 25, 2026.
PAC noted that a recurring issue within RTDA is the use of short-term road repairs that fail to provide lasting solutions, resulting in repeated damage and continuous public expenditure.
One of the cited cases was the Rusizi–Bugarama road, where Rwf 392 million was spent on routine repairs, yet the road continues to deteriorate.
In the Northern Province, MPs also questioned the Musanze–Rubavu–Nyakinama road, where only localized repairs are carried out despite the road requiring full rehabilitation. According to PAC, repeated patching works on the road have already cost about Rwf 2.6 billion.
PAC Vice Chairperson Murumunawabo Cecile questioned the value for money in such interventions, asking how minor repairs could require such substantial funding.
Another concern was raised regarding the Huye–Gisagara road, where drainage systems and bridges remain incomplete, despite extended dry periods. RTDA attributed the delays to weather disruptions affecting construction schedules.
MPs further pointed to the Ngororero–Mukamira–Meru–Nyabarongo road, where Rwf 980 million has been spent on minor repairs despite ongoing structural deterioration, raising concerns about weak maintenance planning.
Concerns over unsustainable repair methods
MP Karinijabo Barthélemy criticized the continued use of temporary materials such as laterite for road patching, saying they are quickly washed away by rain, leading to repeated spending.

He argued that such approaches result in continuous loss of public funds and fail to deliver durable infrastructure.
“Where laterite is used, it does not last long. We end up constantly repairing roads while public resources continue to be spent. Heavy rains and traffic quickly damage these sections,” he said, adding that more durable solutions should be prioritized.
He further questioned why short-term interventions are chosen when longer-lasting alternatives are available.
RTDA responds to concerns
RTDA Director General Imena Munyampenda acknowledged that some of the interventions have not been implemented optimally, attributing the situation to the condition of aging road infrastructure and budget constraints.
He explained that many roads have exceeded their intended lifespan, making repeated repairs unavoidable.
“When a road has aged beyond its lifespan, any intervention is temporary. Damage will continue to reappear in other sections,” he said.
He also noted that RTDA is working on improving the durability of maintenance works within available resources.
Rwf 2.6 billion spent on Cyanika–Musanze–Nyakinama road
PAC also highlighted concerns over Rwf 2.6 billion spent on temporary repairs of the Cyanika–Musanze–Nyakinama road instead of long-term rehabilitation.
RTDA explained that the road, sections of which were constructed as far back as 1982, has reached the end of its design lifespan and continues to deteriorate over time.
After several hours of deliberations, PAC Chairperson Muhakwa Valens said the committee remained unconvinced by the explanations provided by RTDA, particularly regarding value for money.
“We conclude this session not satisfied with the explanations given on the use of public funds, as the interventions appear to have little lasting impact,” he said.
He emphasized the need for a shift toward durable infrastructure investments that reduce the frequency of costly repairs.

76 institutions flagged by audit findings
PAC revealed that 76 institutions are set to appear before the committee after receiving adverse audit opinions from the Auditor General, related to financial mismanagement, non-compliance, or improper use of public funds.
Other institutions were assessed based on partial implementation of audit recommendations or through special and ICT-focused audits.




















































