The effort, which was first proposed last year as part of Trump’s plan to help manage the Gaza ceasefire and reconstruction, has faced a mix of curiosity, criticism and caution from other nations.
Trump’s Board of Peace is being pitched as a global mechanism to promote peace and stability in conflict zones, starting with Gaza but with ambitions beyond. The United States would lead the board, and Trump has invited dozens of countries to join. Officials have described the initiative as a way to move beyond traditional diplomatic channels and offer new tools for conflict resolution.
However, reactions internationally have been mixed. A number of Western European countries, including France, Norway and Sweden, have declined invitations or expressed concerns about the board’s mandate and structure, fearing it could rival or undercut the role of established bodies like the United Nations. Some nations worry that the board’s broad scope could weaken international consensus on peace efforts.
At the same time, a bloc of Muslim-majority nations, alongside countries from Asia, Eastern Europe and South America, have signaled willingness to participate. Israel has also accepted the invitation, marking a shift from earlier hesitation among some of its officials. So far, around 18 countries have confirmed participation, with more expected following the official signing ceremony in Davos.
The board’s structure, according to draft documents seen by reporters, would include member states serving three‑year terms unless they contribute financially for permanent seats. Leadership roles have been nominated, including prominent figures from politics and diplomacy, though not all details have been finalized or universally accepted.
Trump’s push for the Board of Peace comes alongside other major global topics at Davos, including debates over the aftermath of the Israel‑Hamas conflict, economic cooperation, and geopolitical tensions. While Trump is using his platform to build momentum for the initiative, its long-term influence and effectiveness remain uncertain as world powers weigh whether to embrace or resist the proposal.
Leave a Reply