Tag: InternationalNews

  • DOJ seeks more time on Trump wiretapping inquiry

    {Justice department says more time needed to respond to lawmakers about President Trump’s claim Obama wiretapped him.}

    The Department of Justice has requested more time to respond to a request from lawmakers on the House of Representatives Intelligence Committee for evidence about President Donald Trump’s allegation that then-president Barack Obama wiretapped him.

    The department had been expected to provide a response by Monday to the House Intelligence Committee, which has made Trump’s wiretapping claims part of a bigger investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

    But spokeswoman Sarah Isgur Flores said in a statement that the department has asked for more time to “review the request in compliance with the governing legal authorities and to determine what if any responsive documents may exist”.

    The committee replied in a statement that it wanted a response by the time of a planned hearing on March 20.

    “If the committee does not receive a response by then, the committee will ask for this information during the March 20 hearing and may resort to a compulsory process if our questions continue to go unanswered,” a spokesman said.

    The justice department is not required to respond to the representatives’ request for evidence or meet its deadline.

    {{Not ‘literally’ wiretapping}}

    Trump tweeted earlier this month that Obama had ordered him to be wiretapped. He presented no evidence, and the former intelligence director said last week that the claim was false.

    The White House on Monday appeared to soften Trump’s claim.

    Spokesman Sean Spicer said the president was not using the word wiretapping literally, noting that Trump had put the term in quotation marks – which he did only in his first tweet.

    “The president used the word wiretap in quotes to mean broadly surveillance and other activities,” Spicer said.

    He also suggested Trump was not accusing Obama specifically, but instead referring to the actions of his administration.

    Trump himself has not commented on the matter since his March 4 tweets.

    Source:Al Jazeera

  • Taliban kill eight Afghan police in ‘insider attack’

    {Separately, three fighters attack an airbase close to the border with Pakistan in the eastern province of Khost.}

    Eight policemen were killed by their colleagues after they were poisoned in their base in southern Afghanistan in the latest “insider attack”.

    The Taliban claimed responsibility for the incident, which happened in Nawshar district of southern Zabul province late on Friday, as the group escalates a deadly winter campaign of violence.

    “The infiltrators first poisoned their colleagues and then shot them dead,” provincial spokesman Gul Islam Seyal told AFP news agency on Saturday, adding the attackers fled the area taking all the weapons and munitions from the base.

    The governor of Zabul, Bismillah Afghanmal, said they had launched an investigation into the incident.

    Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said in a message to the media that the group’s “infiltrators” carried out the attack.

    The Reuters news agency, quoting local officials, said the attackers defected to Taliban.

    So-called insider attacks – when Afghan soldiers and police turn their guns on their colleagues or on international troops – have been a major problem during the more than 15-year-long war.

    Such attacks have sapped morale and caused deep mistrust within security ranks.

    In a similar incident last month, an Afghan policeman linked to the Taliban shot dead 11 of his colleagues at a checkpoint in the neighbouring Helmand province.

    And last September, two Afghan soldiers with suspected Taliban links killed at least 12 of their comrades as they slept in the volatile northern province of Kunduz.

    OPINION: Drones kill any chance of peace in Afghanistan

    Separately on Saturday, gunmen attacked a military airbase in the eastern province of Khost.

    Faizullah Ghairat, security chief of Khost province, said three assailants attacked the base, close to the border with Pakistan. One was killed while two others escaped, he said.

    The attackers tried to enter the base but were prevented by guards.

    “Our forces have shot one armed attacker dead, and at least two [would be] suicide attackers are at large, we are looking for them,” he said.

    Nine people, including seven CIA agents, were killed in a suicide attack carried by a Jordanian associated with al-Qaeda on the same military base in December 2009. Camp Chapman in Khost is said to be instrumental in providing intelligence to the CIA for drone attacks across the border in Pakistan.

    There was no immediate comment from the headquarters of the NATO-led Resolute Support mission in Kabul.

    The incident comes just before the normal start of the spring fighting season, when the warmer weather brings increased operations by both rebel and government forces.

    Afghan and US officials have warned that Afghanistan will see increased fighting this year as the Taliban steps up a campaign that has cut the area controlled by the government to below 60 percent.

    Earlier this week, the head of US Central Command, General Joseph Votel, asked for more American troops to join the roughly 8,400 already stationed there.

    The Afghan interior ministry said over the past 25 hours, security forces had killed 51 fighters in counterterrorism operations across Afghanistan.

    Officials warn that Afghanistan will see increased fighting this year as the Taliban steps up attacks.

    Source:Al Jazeera

  • Donald Trump invites Mahmoud Abbas to White House

    {White House says US president welcomes his Palestinian counterpart to visit ‘in the near future’.}

    US President Donald Trump has invited Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas for a visit to the White House, in the first phone call between the two leaders since Trump’s inauguration on January 20.

    Trump invited Abbas “to visit the White House soon to discuss ways to resume the [Palestinian-Israeli] political process”, Wafa, the official Palestinian news agency, quoted Abbas’ spokesman Nabil Abu Rudeina as saying on Friday.

    The White House said in a statement that Trump invited Abbas to a meeting at the White House “in the near future”.

    Abbas told Trump that peace was a “strategic choice” for the Palestinian people which should lead to the “establishment of a Palestinian state alongside Israel,” Wafa reported.

    The White House said Trump told Abbas that he believes a peace deal between Israelis and Palestinians must be negotiated directly by the both sides.

    “The president emphasised his personal belief that peace is possible and that the time has come to make a deal,” according to a White House statement.

    Al Jazeera’s Patty Culhane, reporting from Washington, DC, said this signals that Trump is going to take a different approach than previous administrations.

    “Like most things, he puts things in the language of a businessman. He’s said in the past that it would be the ‘ultimate deal’,” our correspondent said.

    “We believe he is going to let his son-in-law Jared Kushner take the lead. It’s not clear how much the Palestinians will trust him. His family foundation has given money to illegal settlements in the West Bank. That is something the likely new US ambassador to Israel has also done.”

    Trump’s pick for ambassador, David Friedman, was approved on Thursday by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. His nomination heads next to the full Senate for a vote.

    He has been criticised for inflammatory language used in relation to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, including calling the two-state solution “a scam”.

    In his confirmation hearing, he said that Israeli settlements, which he previously strongly supported, may not be helpful to the peace process.

    Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank are considered illegal under international law and have been major stumbling blocks in negotiations between Palestinians and Israelis.

    {{Two-state solution}}

    In February, Trump met Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House.

    During that meeting, Trump broke with decades of US policy by saying he was not bound to the two-state solution for ending the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

    “I’m looking at two-state and one-state, and I like the one that both parties like … I can live with either one,” Trump had said, causing consternation across the Arab world and in many European capitals.

    The White House has since been more cautious on the issue of the two-state solution, and there has been less talk of moving the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, a promise Trump made during his election campaign.

    Palestinians criticised such promises as they hope to make East Jerusalem the capital of their future state, and have had the broad support of the international community for that aspiration.

    During his meeting with Netanyahu, the US leader had said he would “love to see” the American embassy move.

    Friedman has also said he wants to see the embassy move and expects to work from Jerusalem at least some of the time.

    In January, Abbas wrote to Trump telling him not move the US embassy, warning that such a development would have a “disastrous impact on the peace process, on the two-state solution and on the stability and security of the entire region”.

    {{Israeli settlements}}

    While Abbas was one of the first world leaders former President Barack Obama called, Trump has been cautious with contacts with the Arab world.

    He has spoken to Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi and met Jordan’s King Abdullah, who flew to Washington for an impromptu visit.

    One of the most heated issues of Middle East peace is Israel’s building of settlements in the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem, territory Palestinians want for their own state along with Gaza.

    During the US election campaign, Trump said he did not necessarily see settlements as an obstacle to peace.

    Since his inauguration, Israel has announced plans to build at least 6,000 more settler homes, a substantial increase and an indication that Israel took Trump’s softer language as a green light.

    But during Netanyahu’s visit, Trump said he wanted the Israeli prime minister to “hold back on settlements for a little bit”.

    Trump has been cautious in his contacts with Arab leaders including Abbas

    Source:Al Jazeera

  • Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu insists on Netherlands visit

    {Foreign Minister Cavusoglu says he will go to Rotterdam in support of referendum, despite Dutch ban on public speeches.}

    Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu has said he will go to Rotterdam on Saturday, despite an official ban on campaigning there for the upcoming Turkish referendum.

    Cavusoglu on Saturday said that Turkish citizens living in the Netherlands were “being taken hostage” by the Dutch injunction on political rallies and speeches.

    It is the latest in a series of bans across Europe, most of them in Germany, that prohibit Turkish leaders from campaigning to drum up support among Turkish expats on behalf of the country’s ruling party for an April referendum aimed at strengthening presidential powers in Turkey.

    Speaking in an interview on CNN Turk television, Cavusoglu said that if the Netherlands refused to give him permission to fly to Rotterdam, Turkey would respond with harsh economic and political sanctions.

    On Friday, Rotterdam mayor Ahmed Aboutaleb told reporters that Cavusoglu was welcome, but that all public rallies and speeches had been cancelled.

    “He has diplomatic immunity and everything so we will treat him with respect, but we have other instruments to prohibit things happening in public spaces,” Aboutaleb said.

    Cavusoglu’s delegation announced on Facebook that the gathering would instead be held at the private residence of the Turkish consul in Rotterdam. The invitation to the gathering asked visitors not to use their car horns or wave Turkish flags.

    With the ban on campaign rallies, Rotterdam joined a growing list of European cities that block such gatherings for fear of unrest.

    This week, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan accused Germany of “Nazi practices” after Turkish leaders had been prevented from rallying expats in several Germany cities in support of the referendum.

    Many in Europe worry that Erdogan is capitalising on post-coup fears to push through a more authoritarian system with few checks on his power.

    Cavusoglu threatened the Netherlands with sanctions if his visit was blocked

    Source:Al Jazeera

  • Suspected Maoist rebels kill 11 police in Chhattisgarh

    {Armed group attack convoy carrying paramilitary forces, confiscate weapons and radio sets, officials say.}

    Suspected Maoist rebels have killed 11 paramilitary commandos on Saturday in a remote part of central India after ambushing their convoy, police said, the latest attack in a simmering internal conflict.

    The troops were on their way to provide protection to workers for a road construction project when the gunmen attacked, a senior police officer of the restive Chhattisgarh state said.

    The assault is the latest in a deadly conflict that pits the fighters against local and national authorities in the forests and rural areas of mainly central and eastern India.

    The armed group, who say they are fighting for the rights of tribal people and landless farmers, often collect funds through extortion.

    “We can confirm that 11 security personnel have lost their lives in the ambush which was carried out by Maoist rebels in Sukma district,” police deputy inspector general Sundarraj P told AFP news agency.

    “Three other CRPF (Central Reserve Police Force) personnel are critically injured. We have deployed helicopters to evacuate them.”

    The rebels also snatched weapons and radio sets from the attack site, local media reports said.

    The Maoists are believed to be present in at least 20 states, but are most active in Chhattisgarh, Orissa, Bihar, Jharkhand and Maharashtra, occupying thousands of square kilometres of land.

    The decades-long conflict is believed to have cost tens of thousands of lives, with much action focused around the so-called “Red Corridor” stretching through central and eastern India.

    Critics believe attempts to end the revolt through tough security offensives are doomed to fail, saying the real solution is development of the region.

    Source:Al Jazeera

  • PM Modi’s party takes firm lead in state elections

    {Victory for Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party in Uttar Pradesh would boost his chances of winning the 2019 general election.}

    Early counting on Saturday in India’s most populous state showed Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s party leading in the country’s most important electoral test since the 2014 general election.

    Victory for Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in Uttar Pradesh, which is home to 220 million people, would boost his chances of winning the 2019 general election and underscore his popularity after he made himself the face of the party’s campaign.

    The prime minister would also see success as vindication of his sudden decision in November to abolish high-denomination banknotes to rein in corruption.

    The move was seen as politically risky, because most transactions in India are carried out in cash and millions of Indians were forced to join long queues outside banks to deposit their old bills or get hold of new ones.

    READ MORE: India – Modi’s radio show

    Though it was premature to call the outcome, the election commission put the BJP leading in 262 of the 403 seats in the state, putting it on course for a large majority.

    The BJP’s vote share based on early counting is more than 40 percent, the election commission said.

    Having campaigned in the state for two months, Modi, and his election strategist Amit Shah, can take credit if the BJP wins – but may face a backlash from sidelined party elders if they come up short.

    “The results will redefine the prime minister’s political destiny and his future course of action,” an aide to Modi in the capital, New Delhi, told Reuters news agency.

    Post-election surveys had suggested Modi’s BJP had done enough to come first in Uttar Pradesh, home to one in six Indians, but that it might fall short of an outright majority.

    The exit polls, which are often wrong in India, also put the BJP ahead in three of four other states that will declare election outcomes on Saturday.

    According to early voting trends, opposition Congress party was leading in the state of Punjab, while the BJP was ahead in the northern state of Uttarakhand and in the coastal state of Goa.

    Results of a ballot in a fifth state, Manipur, were also due on Saturday.

    The BJP’s opponents include an alliance between Congress and the ruling Samajwadi Party, a tie-up that caught Modi’s party off guard. A better than expected showing by a third party could complicate the picture as results filter out.

    A strong BJP showing would be welcomed by investors counting on further economic reforms – including the launch of a national sales tax – in the absence of any credible opponent who might halt Modi’s march to a second term in 2019.

    Short of a majority, the BJP could see opponents block its path to power in the state by forming a coalition, although Modi’s party will also look to convince its smaller rivals to join forces.

    “If the BJP fails to secure a majority, then Modi’s economic decisions will be questioned and his failure to create jobs will impact his political future,” said Mohan Guruswamy, who heads the Centre for Policy Alternatives, an independent think-tank.

    Uttar Pradesh and four other Indian states are holding state legislature elections.

    Source:Al Jazeera

  • San Jose Pinula girl shelter fire toll rises to 37

    {Grieving family members bury the remains of 37 girls burned alive under lock and key at a San Jose Pinula shelter.}

    Families buried some of the 37 girls killed in a fire at an overcrowded government-run youth shelter as Guatemalan authorities worked on Friday to determine exactly what happened.

    The death toll mounted as girls succumbed to gruesome burns from Wednesday’s disaster, which officials said began when mattresses were set afire during a protest by the shelter’s residents.

    Questions remained over why someone among the girls set the blaze and whether doors remained locked as the girls pleaded for their lives.

    Parents and relatives said many of the young people at the shelter, which had both female and male residents, had been sent there because of abuse, poverty or family problems.

    Others were ordered there by judges after run-ins with police, officials said.

    A coffin holding 17-year-old Siona Hernandez Garcia was gently slipped into a niche at a Guatemala City cemetery on Friday and street musicians played hymns as workers bricked up the space.

    Maria Garcia, Siona’s mother wailed and demanded justice.

    “Guatemala is full of violence,” Garcia said. “They are raping and killing the poor’s girls.”

    At the entrance to Roosevelt Hospital, Claudia Tecun broke down in tears talking about her daughter Noemi Tecun Munoz, 17, who was being treated inside for burns over 70 percent of her body.

    “The doctors say there isn’t much hope she will live,” Tecun said, weeping.

    “I heard on the news that my daughter was one of the girls who set the fire at the shelter; that’s not true,” she said. “My daughter wouldn’t try to take her own life.”

    That was a reference to widespread reports, including from other victims’ relatives, that some of the girls set mattresses on fire to protest their apprehension and return to the facility after fleeing the previous night because of mistreatment, bad food and fears of rape.

    San Juan de Dios Hospital officials said late on Friday that another girl had succumbed to her wounds, bringing the death toll to 37, with 19 dying at the scene and 18 others later while being treated at hospitals.

    Hospital director Carlos Soto said that visiting doctors evaluating the burn victims had offered to take eight of them to Galveston, Texas, for specialised burn treatment.

    Soto said the government had obtained humanitarian visas for the children from US officials, but authorities were awaiting permission from the parents.

    Geovany Castillo said his 15-year-old daughter, Kimberly, suffered burns on her face, arms and hands but survived.

    She was in a locked area where girls who took part in the escape attempt had been placed, he said.

    “My daughter said the area was locked and that several girls broke down a door, and she survived because she put a wet sheet over herself,” Castillo said.

    “She said the girls told her that they had been raped and in protest they escaped, and that later, to protest, to get attention, they set fire to the mattresses,” he said.

    As grieving families began receiving the bodies of girls whose remains had been identified, others were still searching for their children.

    Vianney Clareth Hernandez was waiting outside a morgue with a photo of her daughter, Ashley.

    The 14-year-old was at the shelter but her mother said she had not found the girl at any of the local hospitals.

    “It was a crime they didn’t open the doors, they didn’t do anything to get the girls out, even though they were screaming,” Hernandez said.

    While many people believed reports that the doors at the overcrowded shelter were kept locked even as the fires spread, authorities said the circumstances were still under investigation.

    But the exact sequence of events may never be known. Castillo said his daughter Kimberly had testified to police that the girls who started the fire were among those who died in the blaze.

    The few surviving girls at the hospital were put under police guard on Friday for their own protection as witnesses.

    The fire started as the girls protested against alleged sexual and physical abuse.

    Source:Al Jazeera

  • Park Geun-hye fired as court upholds impeachment

    {Constitutional Court unanimously rules to formally remove impeached President Park Geun-hye from office.}

    South Korea’s top court has ruled to formally end impeached President Park Geun-hye’s rule.

    Eight judges from the Constitutional Court assembled on Friday to issue a verdict to remove Park from office over a corruption scandal.

    The ruling sparked protests from hundreds of her supporters, two of whom were killed in clashes with police outside the court.

    It marks the first time a South Korean president has been ousted before the end of their term since democracy replaced dictatorship in the late 1980s.

    In contrast, tens of thousands of South Koreans occupied a square in front of an old palace in the capital to celebrate Park’s ousting.

    The ruling opens Park, who no longer has immunity as a president, up to possible criminal proceedings – prosecutors have already named her a criminal suspect.

    It also marks the first time a South Korean president has been ousted before the end of their term since democracy replaced dictatorship in the late 1980s.

    Election law now requires a snap poll to be held within 60 days.

    Park, 65, has been accused of colluding with a friend, Choi Soon-sil, and a former presidential aide, both of whom have been on trial, to pressure big businesses to donate to two foundations set up to back her policy initiatives.

    She is also accused of soliciting bribes from the head of the Samsung Group for government favours including the backing of a merger of two Samsung affiliates in 2015 that was seen to support the succession of control over the country’s largest “chaebol” conglomerate.

    Park has denied any wrongdoing, but apologised for putting trust in her friend.

    Park’s action had “seriously impaired the spirit of … democracy and the rule of law,” said constitutional court chief justice Lee Jung-Mi. “President Park Geun-hye … has been dismissed.”

    Prosecutors have arrested and indicted a slew of high-profile figures over the scandal, including Park’s confidante Choi Soon-sil, top Park administration officials and Samsung heir Lee Jae-yong.

    But Park has avoided a direct investigation thanks to a law that gives a sitting president immunity from prosecution for most of alleged crimes.

    Since she’s now no longer in power, prosecutors can summon, question and possibly arrest her.

    Park will not vacate the official residence of the president of South Korea, the Blue House, on Friday as her aides are preparing for her return to her private home in southern Seoul.

    She was not planning any statement on Friday, the Blue House said.

    “That’s been one of the uncertainties today because we are in unchartered territory,” Al Jazeera’s Rob McBride, reporting from Seoul, said.

    “It was thought in one stage that the ruling would mean she would have to leave immediately but that doesn’t seem to be the case. She is there for this evening and we expect her to leave sometime over the weekend.”

    Park’s parliamentary impeachment in December came after weeks of Saturday rallies that drew millions who wanted her resignation.

    Overwhelmed by the biggest rallies in decades, the voices of Park supporters were largely ignored. But they have recently regrouped and staged fierce pro-Park rallies.

    In anticipation of the ruling, Park supporters, many of them dressed in army-style fatigues and wearing red berets, and those who want Park gone began showing up around the Constitutional Court building.

    A big television screen was set up near the court so that people could watch the verdict live. Hundreds of police also began preparing for the protests, putting on helmets with visors and black, hard plastic breastplates and shin guards.

    Some of Park’s supporters reacted with anger after the ruling, shouting and hitting police officers and reporters with plastic flag poles and steel ladders, and climbing on police buses. Anti-Park protesters celebrated by marching in the streets near the Blue House, carrying flags, signs and an effigy of Park dressed in prison clothes and tied up with rope.

    The Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency said two people died while protesting Park’s removal. An official from the Seoul National University Hospital said that a man in his 70s, believed to be a Park supporter, died from head wounds after falling from the top of a police bus.

    An official from the Kangbuk Samsung Hospital in Seoul said another man brought from the pro-Park rally died shortly after receiving CPR at the hospital. The hospital official could not immediately confirm the cause of death.

    Prime Minister Hwang Kyo-ahn has led the government as acting leader since Park’s impeachment and he will continue to do so until South Korea elects a new president by May.

    He called on Park’s supporters and opponents to put their differences aside to prevent deeper division.

    “It is time to accept, and close the conflict and confrontation we have suffered,” Hwang said in a televised speech on Friday.

    People on both sides had previously threatened not to accept a Constitutional Court decision.

    One of Park’s lawyers told the court last month that there will be “a rebellion and blood will drench the asphalt” if Park is booted from office.

    Park’s critics want to see her appear on TV while dressed in prison garb, handcuffed and bound like others involved in the scandal. But some analysts worry that could create a backlash by conservatives.

    Jean Lee, a journalist and global fellow at the Woodrow Wilson Center’s Korea centre, told Al Jazeera there is a sense of fear among Park supporters that this decision will be a security threat.

    “There is a lot of fear by the older generation, the old guard. There’s fear it’s made [the country] more vulnerable,” Lee said.

    Even after the election, imprisoning Park could still be a burden for a new government, which must pursue national unity to overcome security, economic and other problems, said Chung Jin-young, a professor at Kyung Hee University. Others say it will not be difficult.

    Liberal Moon Jae-in, who lost to Park in the 2012 election, currently enjoys a comfortable lead in opinion surveys.

    Pre-verdict surveys showed that 70 to 80 percent of South Koreans wanted the court to approve Park’s impeachment. But there have been worries that Park’s ouster would further polarise the country and cause violence.

    Source:Al Jazeera

  • Trump’s travel ban challenged by Washington and Hawaii

    {Washington, Massachusetts, Oregon, New York and Hawaii seek to block president’s immigration order.}

    Several US states have said they will move forward with legal challenges to President Donald Trump’s revised executive order that targets citizens of six Muslim-majority countries and refugees.

    Washington state, which was the first to sue over Trump’s initial travel ban that created chaos worldwide and was eventually blocked, argued that the revised order violates the constitution “by disfavouring Islam”.

    Bob Ferguson, the state’s attorney general, said a motion by his office calls on an existing injunction against the travel ban issued in January to be applied to the new directive.

    “My message to President Trump is – not so fast,” Ferguson said. “After spending more than a month to fix a broken order that he rushed out the door, the president’s new order reinstates several of the same provisions and has the same illegal motivations as the original.”

    Attorney generals in the states of New York, Massachusetts and Oregon said they had taken steps to join the lawsuit that Washington had filed along with Minnesota.

    The opposition comes on top of a separate legal challenge to the new ban brought by Hawaii.

    The revised executive order issued on Monday bars new visas for people from Syria, Iran, Somalia, Libya, Sudan and Yemen, and temporarily shuts down the US refugee programme for 120 days.

    It is supposed to go into effect on March 16, and does not apply to travellers who already have visas.

    Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum said the executive order has hurt Oregon, its residents, employers, agencies, educational institutions, healthcare system and economy.

    New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman called the executive order “a Muslim ban by another name”.

    The attorney general in Hawaii argued that while the new order features changes to address complaints raised by courts that blocked the first travel ban, the new order is pretty much the same as the first one.

    “Nothing of substance has changed: There is the same blanket ban on entry from Muslim-majority countries (minus one),” state attorney general Doug Chin said in a statement.

    Hawaii’s lawsuit says the order will harm Hawaii’s Muslim population, tourism and foreign students.

    White House spokesman Sean Spicer said Thursday the administration believed the revised travel ban will stand up to legal scrutiny.

    “We feel very confident with how that was crafted and the input that was given,” Spicer said.

    A federal judge in Seattle issued a temporary restraining order halting the initial ban after Washington state and Minnesota sued. The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals refused to reinstate the order.

    University of Richmond Law School professor Carl Tobias said Hawaii’s complaint seemed in many ways similar to Washington’s successful lawsuit, but whether it would prompt a similar result was tough to say.

    Given that the new executive order spells out more of a national security rationale than the old one and allows for some travellers from the six nations to be admitted on a case-by-case basis, it will be harder to show that the new order is intended to discriminate against Muslims, Tobias said.

    “The administration’s cleaned it up, but whether they have cleaned it up enough I don’t know,” he said. “It may be harder to convince a judge there’s religious animus here.”

    Tobias also said it is good that Hawaii’s lawsuit includes an individual plaintiff, considering that some legal scholars have questioned whether the states themselves have standing to challenge the ban.

    Imam Ismail Elshikh of the Muslim Association of Hawaii is a plaintiff in the state’s challenge. He says the ban will prevent his Syrian mother-in-law from visiting him.

    Critics of the revised order say it is still a Muslim ban, despite changes in language

    Source:Al Jazeera

  • Tusk wins second term as EU chief despite Polish fury

    {European Union leaders re-elect Donald Tusk as president despite opposition from his native Poland.}

    European Union leaders confirmed Donald Tusk for a second term as their president, angering his home country of Poland and opening up a new rift at a time when EU unity is essential.

    The 27 other EU leaders overrode weeks of objections from the nationalist government in Warsaw, which has a long and bitter rivalry with former Prime Minister Tusk and opposed giving him another term at the EU.

    Tusk’s supporters portrayed his re-election on Thursday as head of the EU Council, one of the bloc’s most prestigious jobs, as a sign of stability and continuity for the troubled bloc.

    Tusk’s future was dealt with in less than an hour as fellow leaders rejected the argument of Poland, an increasingly awkward partner, that a decision should be delayed.

    That spared the EU a long debate about its leadership at a time when it is dealing with Britain’s planned departure and a host of other challenges. Austrian Chancellor Christian Kern said such a dispute would “plunge Europe into a senseless crisis”.

    “The dispute was expected,” said Al Jazeera’s Nadim Baba, reporting from Brussels.

    There is a lot of bad blood between the current administration in Warsaw and the president of the European Council. Donald Tusk himself acknowledge what he called a paradox that his own country opposed him, but he is promising to make the European Union a better and stronger institution.”

    Poland said it would refuse to approve some summit texts, and raised questions about how lasting a rift the move would create.

    Polish Prime Minister Beata Szydlo said it was “very bad” that Tusk was pushed through over the objections of his home country, adding that “today it applies to Poland, but in the future this may apply to other nations”.

    With a show of 27 hands that isolated Poland, Tusk still felt there was enough unity around him to go on for a second term of two and a half years.

    The council president is responsible for chairing summits, coordinating the work of member countries and making sure the 28 nations speak as much as possible with one voice on the international stage.

    “It may sound like a paradox because of the context, but anyway, your decision is an expression of our unity today,” Tusk told leaders after his re-election. “I will work with all of you without any exceptions because I am truly devoted to a united Europe.”

    Szydlo, however, said Tusk could not be impartial when it came to dealing with the government in Warsaw.

    The leader of Poland’s governing Law and Justice party, Jaroslaw Kaczynski, accused Tusk of disloyalty to his homeland, saying he didn’t have the right to “function under (Poland’s) white and red flag”.

    In an apparent reference to the Polish government, Tusk said: “Be careful of the bridges you burn because once they are gone you can never cross them again.”

    He also vowed to keep his nation out of political isolation despite its obstructionist course.

    German Chancellor Angela Merkel said other EU countries had spoken extensively with Poland beforehand.

    She said it is important to seek consensus, but “the search for consensus must of course not be used for a blockade”.

    Merkel stressed other EU countries’ interest in good relations with Poland. “We will see how things develop. I hope that we can return to sensible cooperation,” she said.

    Poland’s government argues that Tusk supports the domestic opposition in Poland and has failed to protect the country’s interests in the EU.

    There is also long-standing personal animosity between Tusk and Kaczynski, Poland’s most influential politician.

    Kaczynski accuses Tusk of contributing, through lax security, to the death of his twin brother, President Lech Kaczynski, in a plane crash in 2010.

    On Thursday, Warsaw failed to win support even from frequent ally Hungary, which has also clashed in recent years with Brussels over Hungary’s refusal to take in migrants and over concerns about the rule of law.

    Other EU countries weren’t impressed with its proposal that Jacek Saryusz-Wolski, a little-known European Parliament lawmaker, replace Tusk in a job traditionally held by a former national leader.

    “I don’t see how one country could oppose this solution when all the others are in favor,” French President Francois Hollande said.

    Tusk's home country of Poland was the only to vote against his re-election

    Source:Al Jazeera