Tag: InternationalNews

  • Afghanistan rejects grim U.S. intelligence forecast as baseless

    Afghanistan rejects grim U.S. intelligence forecast as baseless

    {Afghanistan on Monday rejected as baseless a U.S. intelligence forecast that the gains the United States and allies have made in the past three years will be significantly rolled back by 2017.}

    The U.S. National Intelligence Estimate also predicted that Afghanistan would fall into chaos if Washington and Kabul failed to sign a pact to keep an international military contingent there beyond 2014.

    President Hamid Karzai’s spokesman dismissed the U.S. forecast, reported by the Washington Post on the weekend, and suggested there was an ulterior motive for it.

    “We strongly reject that as baseless as they have in the past been proved inaccurate,” Faizi told Reuters.

    Relations between Afghanistan and the United States have grown seriously strained recently by Karzai’s refusal to sign the security pact that would permit some U.S. forces to stay.

    U.S. officials have said that unless a deal is reached to keep perhaps 8,000 U.S. troops, the Taliban might stage a major comeback and al Qaeda could regain safe havens.

    The pact must also be signed for the United States and its allies to provide billions more dollars in aid.

    Without a deal, the United States could pull out all troops, the so-called zero option, leaving Afghan forces to battle the Taliban on their own.

    The United States has set a Tuesday deadline for Afghanistan to sign the pact but the White House has said it is prepared to let the deadline slip until early January.

    The U.S. intelligence estimate predicted setbacks even if some U.S. troops remained. But some U.S. officials felt the forecast was overly pessimistic, the Washington Post said.

    LAND FOR PEACE?

    Faizi suggested the leaking of the gloomy U.S. intelligence report was part of bid to press Karzai into granting the Taliban control of some areas as part of a peace moves.

    “If it’s a design to hand over parts of Afghanistan to the Taliban, we will never allow that and it will never succeed,” Faizi said. “The Taliban can only come back through a political process.”

    Efforts over the past couple of years to bring the Taliban into peace talks have come to nothing. The insurgents, fighting to expel foreign forces and set up an Islamist state, denounce Karzai as a U.S. “puppet”.

    Karzai recently said certain foreigners had been asking him to give up control of some areas to get peace talks going.

    “Foreigners told us recently to hand over or give away some areas to the Taliban, and from where a peace process could begin,” Karzai told reporters at a briefing last week.

    He did not identify the foreigners.

    Karzai also denied having reached agreement with the United States on the wording of contentious clauses in the U.S. security pact. But he added that the “zero-option” was an empty threat.

    “The U.S. won’t go and I have realized that,” he said.

    “Look at all those buildings and bases they have built in Bagram, Helmand and their embassy compound,” Karzai said, referring to a big air base north of Kabul and a violence-plagued southern province.

    Reuters

  • French footballer Anelka in trouble over ‘anti-Semitic’ gesture

    French footballer Anelka in trouble over ‘anti-Semitic’ gesture

    {The French footballer Nicolas Anelka has come under fire for making an alleged anti-Semitic gesture during a football match in England, which the striker claims it was meant as a tribute to a controversial comedian.}

    The incident came during Saturday’s 3-3 draw between Anelka’s West Bromwich Albion and West Ham United in the Premier League.

    Celebrating after scoring the first of two goals in the match, the 34-year-old thrust his straightened right arm downwards while tapping his bicep with the other hand.

    The gesture, known as a “quenelle”, has been made famous in France by comedian Dieudonné M’Bala M’Bala, widely known just by his first name, and is often interpreted as a modified Nazi salute and anti-Semitic.

    Anelka’s use of the gesture sparked immediate widespread condemnation.

    ‘Shocking provocation’

    “Anelka’s gesture is a shocking provocation, disgusting,” French Sports Minister Valerie Fourneyron said on Twitter. “There’s no place for anti-Semitism on the football field.”

    England’s Football Association said it would launch an investigation into Anelka’s actions, while the European Jewish Congress demanded that Premier League officials ban the player.

    “This salute is merely a lesser known Nazi salute and we expect the same kind of punishment to be handed down by the authorities as if Anelka had made the infamous outstretched arm salute,” said European Jewish Congress president Moshe Kantor in a statement.

    The former Real Madrid, Chelsea, Arsenal, Liverpool, Manchester City and Paris St Germain striker tried to play down the incident, however.

    In a Twitter post, he said the gesture had been meant merely as a tribute to Dieudonné, a close friend of Anelka’s.

    The former France International was backed by West Brom caretaker coach Keith Downing.

    “It is dedicated to a French comedian he knows very, very well,” said Downing. “I think speculation can be stopped now, it is absolute rubbish really.

    “He is totally unaware of what the problems were or the speculation that has been thrown around, he is totally surprised by it.”

    ‘An anti-Semite and racist’

    Dieudonné is a controversial figure in France and has outraged French authorities and Jewish organisations many times with his frequent anti-Semitic tirades. He has been fined seven times for defamation, insult and provocation to hate, and for racial discrimination.

    The quenelle salute, said to look like a mix of a downward Nazi hail and an obscene French movement meaning “Up Yours”, has been adopted by many of Dieudonné’s fans, though interpretations vary as to whether it is anti-Semitic or anti-establishment.

    Dieudonné himself is linked to some radical figures, notably to the former leader of France’s xenophobic National Front party, Jean-Marie Le Pen, who is also godfather to one of his daughters.

    On Friday, French Interior Minister Manuel Valls announced he would try to legally ban public performances by Dieudonné.

    Valls judged Dieudonné was “no longer a comedian” but was rather an “anti-Semite and racist” who fell afoul of France’s laws against incitement to racial hatred.

    “Despite a conviction for public defamation, hate speech and racial discrimination, Dieudonné M’Bala M’Bala no longer seems to recognise any limits,” a statement released by Valls read.

    “Consequently, the interior minister has decided to thoroughly examine all legal options that would allow a ban on Dieudonné’s public gatherings, which no longer belong to the artistic domain, but rather amount to a public safety risk.”

    (FRANCE 24 with AFP and REUTERS)

  • Israel ‘responds’ to rocket fire from Lebanon

    Israel ‘responds’ to rocket fire from Lebanon

    {Two missiles fired from southern Lebanon exploded in northern Israel, prompting the Israeli military to hit back with about twenty artillery shells, an army spokesman said.}

    “The Israeli artillery responded to the Sunday rocket attacks from Lebanon against Israel that left no victims, targeting the area where these projectiles were fired from,” an army spokesman told AFP news agency.

    The Katyusha-style rockets landed in a field west of the town of Kyriat Shmona, without causing any casualties or damage, Israeli military radio reported.

    Tension has spiked on the border between the two countries since Lebanese troops gunned down an Israeli soldier driving near the frontier on December 16.

    Israel’s border with Lebanon has been largely quiet since the 2006 war with the Shia movement Hezbollah.

    The last time a soldier was killed there was in August 2010, when two Lebanese soldiers and a journalist also died.

    In August, four Israeli soldiers were wounded by an explosion some 400 metres inside Lebanese territory, in a blast claimed by Hezbollah.

    Last week, Hezbollah said one of its top leaders was killed near Beirut and blamed Israel for his murder, a charge denied by Israel, which warned against any retaliation.

    Source:
    Agencies

  • China says satellite network to be big asset, others can use it too

    China says satellite network to be big asset, others can use it too

    China’s homegrown satellite navigation system will bring untold economic, social and military benefits and other countries in Asia are welcome to use it, the director of China’s satellite navigation agency said on Friday.

    The year-old Beidou satellite navigation system is a rival to the U.S. Global Positioning System (GPS) and Russian GLONASS. Beidou’s 16 satellites serve the Asia-Pacific but the number of satellites is expected to grow to 30 by 2020 as coverage expands globally.

    The system would bring benefits across the board, in both civilian and military applications, said Ran Chengqi, the director of the Satellite Navigation Office.

    “The construction of the Beidou network should resolve the country’s security issues, including economic security and the security of society-at-large,” he said. “It’s obviously a combined military and civilian infrastructure.”

    “What purpose it will have for national defense or armament, that’s for the armament department or Defense Ministry to consider, but I think that its uses are many,” Ran told a news conference.

    The successful deployment of Beidou means the increasingly potent Chinese armed forces will have an accurate, independent navigation system – vital technology for guiding the missiles, warships and attack aircraft that allow Beijing to claim great power status.

    Senior Chinese military officers have said Beidou is more important for the country than manned space flight or the Chinese lunar probes now under way, according to reports in the state-run media.

    But the benefits are by no means limited to defense.

    The government sees it as a commercial coup for fast-growing market satellite navigation services for cars, mobile phones and other applications.

    China is encouraging other countries in Asia to adopt it by offering the service free, as the United States does with the civilian GPS network.

    Stations are being built in Pakistan to improve service there and Thailand has signed up to use Beidou for disaster forecasting.

    “It’s completely open,” Ran said. “Technology and service both.”

    “Even though we still do not provide global coverage, its applications are already spreading worldwide,” he said.

    This month, the cabinet approved a blueprint that envisioned Beidou capturing 60 percent of a projected 400 billion yuan ($65 billion) market for satellite navigation services in China, according to the China Daily.

    The newspaper said 40 percent of Beidou’s satellite applications would be for military use.

    Reuters

  • China urged to retaliate for Japan PM shrine visit

    China urged to retaliate for Japan PM shrine visit

    {China must take “excessive” counter-measures after Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s controversial war shrine visit, state-run media urged on Friday, reflecting the smouldering resentment among Chinese at its onetime invader.}

    China expressed strong opposition and summoned Tokyo’s ambassador on Thursday to deliver a “strong reprimand” after Abe paid respects at the Yasukuni shrine.

    The site honours several high-level officials executed for war crimes after World War II, a reminder of Japan’s 20th century aggression and a source of bitterness for China and other Asian countries.

    “People are getting tired of such futile ‘strong condemnations’,” said an editorial in the Global Times, a paper that is close to the ruling Communist Party and often strike a nationalist tone.

    “China needs to take appropriate, even slightly excessive countermeasures” or else “be seen as a ‘paper tiger’”, it warned.

    It suggested barring high-profile Japanese politicians and other officials who went to the shrine from visiting China for five years.

    Abe’s visit was the first by an incumbent Japanese prime minister to the inflammatory site since 2006, and came as tensions between the two Asian powers have escalated since 2012 over an island dispute.

    State-run media also excoriated Abe, who has sought to shore up Japan’s military.

    “In the eyes of China, Abe, behaving like a political villain, is much like the terrorists and fascists on the commonly seen blacklists,” the Global Times said.

    The China Daily called the visit “an intolerable insult” that had “slammed the door to dialogue shut”, adding that “Abe knew it would be an insult. But he does not care”.

    It criticised the leader’s “sheer hypocrisy” and “nasty track record”, including “his denial of the aggressive nature of Japanese intrusions during WWII, his lack of remorse for Japan’s historical sins”.

    Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi called Abe’s visit “a flagrant provocation against international justice and treads arbitrarily on humanity’s conscience”, a ministry statement said on Thursday.

    China and Japan, the world’s second- and third-largest economies, have important trading ties.

    But conflict over East China Sea islands known as Diaoyu in China and Senkaku in Japan have soured diplomatic relations since last year.

    AFP

  • Strong Explosion Shakes Lebanese Capital

    Strong Explosion Shakes Lebanese Capital

    { A strong explosion has shaken the Lebanese capital, sending black smoke billowing from the center of Beirut.
    }

    The blast went off a few hundred meters (yards) from the government headquarters and parliament building. The cause was not immediately known.

    Troops were seen deploying nearby, and ambulances were rushing to the area

    Lebanon has seen a wave of bombings over the past months as tensions rise over Syria’s civil war.

    {{New York Times}}

  • Thai protesters clash with police in Bangkok

    Thai protesters clash with police in Bangkok

    {Thai police in the capital Bangkok have fired teargas at protesters trying to prevent political parties from registering for February’s elections.}

    About 500 protesters tried to storm a stadium where election commission officials were working.

    Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra called the snap elections after weeks of protests that demanded an unelected “people’s council” take power.

    The demonstrators say political reforms are needed before polls can take place.

    On Thursday, the protesters – some of whom were throwing stones – tried to break into the stadium where the electoral commission was registering candidates.

    But police responded with tear gas, dispersing the crowd.

    There were no reports of serious injuries.

    Ms Yingluck dissolved parliament and called an election on 9 December, after more than 150,000 demonstrators took to the streets calling for her government to step down.

    Last Sunday, she said elections must take place and urged protesters to express their views at the ballot box.

    “If we don’t hold on to the democratic system, what should we hold on to?”

    The Pheu Thai Party won the last election in 2011, and has a majority in parliament.

    However, protesters say her brother – ousted former leader Thaksin Shinawatra – remains in charge.

    Mr Thaksin is currently in self-imposed exile after he was overthrown in a military army coup in 2006 and convicted of corruption.

    BBC

  • Snowden’s message on privacy

    Snowden’s message on privacy

    (Reuters) – Former U.S. National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden, who revealed details of electronic surveillance by American and British spy services, warned of the dangers posed by a loss of privacy in a message broadcast to Britain on Christmas Day.

    In a two-minute video recorded in Moscow, where Snowden has been granted temporary asylum, he spoke of concerns over surveillance and appeared to draw comparison with the dystopian tale “1984” which described a fictional state which operates widespread surveillance of its citizens.

    “Great Britain’s George Orwell warned us of the danger of this kind of information. The types of collection in the book – microphones and video cameras, TVs that watch us are nothing compared to what we have available today.”

    “We have sensors in our pockets that track us everywhere we go. Think about what this means for the privacy of the average person,” he said.

    “A child born today will grow up with no conception of privacy at all,” said Snowden. “They’ll never know what it means to have a private moment to themselves, an unrecorded, unanalyzed thought. And that’s a problem because privacy matters, privacy is what allows us to determine who we are and who we want to be.”

    The “Alternative Christmas Message”, broadcast annually on Britain’s Channel 4 television since 1993, mimics the format of the yearly address to the nation by Queen Elizabeth.

    “For me, in terms of personal satisfaction, the mission’s already accomplished,” he said.

    Snowden left his NSA post in Hawaii in May and went public with his first revelations from Hong Kong a few weeks later.

    In June, he left for Russia and stayed at Moscow’s Sheremetyevo airport for nearly six weeks until the Kremlin granted him temporary one-year asylum.

    The United States has revoked his passport and demanded he be sent home to face charges for stealing secrets.

    Earlier this month there were signs of thawing attitudes when Richard Ledgett – a top NSA official who leads a task force at the agency responding to the leaks – left open the option for Snowden to return to the United States in an amnesty.

    “It’s worth having a conversation about,” he told CBS.

    “I would need assurances that the remainder of the data could be secured and my bar for those assurances would be very high,” Ledgett said. Senior officials in the Obama administration remain opposed to such a move.

    Last week a White House-appointed panel proposed curbs on some key NSA surveillance operations, recommending limits on a program to collect records of billions of telephone calls, and new tests before Washington spies on foreign leaders.

    “The conversation occurring today will determine the amount of trust we can place both in the technology that surrounds us and the government that regulates it,” Snowden said in the Christmas address.

    “Together we can find a better balance, end mass surveillance and remind the government that if it really wants to know how we feel, asking is always cheaper than spying.”

    Reuters

  • Iran mulls plan to move capital from Tehran

    Iran mulls plan to move capital from Tehran

    {The Iranian parliament has voted to consider a proposal to pick another city as the nation’s capital, potentially moving the seat of government from the overcrowded Tehran.}

    Iran’s official news agency IRNA said on Tuesday that politicians had accepted outlines of the proposal with 110 out of 214 present lawmakers supporting it. The chamber has 290 seats.

    Under the plan, a council would be set up and spend two years studying which alternate location would be best.

    While there was no suggestion in the bill which cities would be looked at, several central and western cities already have said they would like to be considered.

    Supporters of the plan said Tehran, with a metropolitan population of 12 million people could not support the capital.

    They pointed at the heavy pollution, the city’s traffic jams and risk of earthquakes there. Iran is located on several faults and experiences a light earthquake a day, on average.

    Still, moving the capital seems unlikely, due to the high cost involved.

    Vice-president Mohammad Ali Ansari, who is in charge of parliament affairs, said he opposed the plan, which he said was was not practical, and that politicians did not have the power to order the capital to be moved.

    He said relocating the capital was part of main policies of the ruling establishment, a reference to the authority of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Supreme Leader, who has final say on all state matters.

    “It is impossible to decide about making the decision on moving without consulting his Excellency,” Ansari said.

    Costly plan

    Parliament speaker Ali Larijani opposed the plan over the cost and said the Guardian Council, a constitutional watchdog that vets the bills, would likely reject it as well.

    Saeed Leilaz, a Tehran-based political-economic analyst, also said the plan was not feasible.

    “This will cost dozens of billion dollars for a government that has not enough to pay the monthly salary of its staff,” Leilaz said.

    Iran has been crippled by Western sanctions over its disputed nuclear power programme, which has cut its access to the oil money that makes up to 80 percent of its foreign income and 50 percent of budget.

    Politicians and officials occasionally have raised the idea over the past 50 years, before the 1979 Islamic Revolution that ousted King Mohmmad Reza Pahlavi.

    US advisers reportedly had asked the king to relocate the capital because it was too close to borders of the Soviet Union.

    During World War I, the Iranian government decided to move the capital temporarily when Russian and British forces occupied parts of the country, although the order was never carried out.

    Source:
    AP

  • The painful path to Obamacare deadline

    The painful path to Obamacare deadline

    {{Tuesday is a moment of truth for Obamacare.}}

    It marks the final deadline for most Americans to sign up for health insurance under President Barack Obama’s 2010 Affordable Care Act, popularly known as Obamacare, if they want coverage starting on January 1.

    If enough people – and the right mix of young and old – do not enroll, the ambitious program designed to provide health benefits to millions of uninsured and under-insured Americans risks eventually unraveling.

    The deadline caps a turbulent roll-out this year for Obamacare and the HealthCare.gov website that is key to enrolling millions of people in the initiative. The website crashed upon its launch on October 1, frustrating users trying to shop for insurance plans. It now is functioning much better, but is still not at 100 percent.

    Despite the continuing problems, the administration is expressing confidence that Obamacare is getting back on track after enrollment accelerated in December, with more than 1 million people signing up for private insurance.

    Here is a look at some notable moments in the months leading up to Obamacare’s troubled launch.

    EYES WIDE SHUT

    In June 2012, Margaret Tavenner was worried.

    As acting director of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), she was responsible for orchestrating the launch of the most sweeping U.S. domestic legislation in more than four decades.

    With uncertainty surrounding how the new law would work, most states were undecided whether to establish their own insurance marketplaces or rely instead on a federally run exchange.

    “What keeps me up at night is knowing around December, there are going to be like 30 states who want to come in and be state-based exchanges,” Tavenner told a Washington healthcare conference, according to the Modern Healthcare newsletter.

    Tavenner’s anxiety – more than a year ahead of the planned launch of the exchanges – spurred concerns among industry and advocacy groups, which publicly questioned whether the multiple government agencies involved in the effort would be able to pull it off.

    The White House was closely briefed on the issues. Tavenner was cleared to visit White House officials involved in the project 425 times from December 2009 to June 2013, including several meetings with Obama, visitor logs show. The White House said later that Obama knew only the broad picture, not details of the effort.

    The administration also sought industry feedback, but some groups complained their warnings fell on deaf ears.

    On a video of a February 2013 conference of health insurance brokers and agents in Washington, attendees could be heard grumbling when CMS official Chiquita Brooks-Lasure asked for feedback by the next day on a “streamlined” insurance application form.

    The 21-page packet was jammed with questions on income and insurance status. For insurance brokers who had learned to keep it simple for customers, it was a harbinger of trouble.

    “It was ridiculous,” said Tom Harte, president of the National Association of Health Underwriters, which sponsored the conference. He said the group had been making suggestions to the administration on Obamacare enrollment for months.

    “The image I always had (of the administration’s efforts) was of a horse with blinders on, just plowing ahead and ignoring everything else,” he said.

    DANGER SIGNS

    Added to technical and administrative issues, CMS had run into political problems on Capitol Hill with Tavenner’s permanent appointment as director.

    A former head of Virginia’s state health system, Tavenner had been acting director of CMS since December 2011 while her confirmation was delayed by partisan clashes in the Senate over Obamacare. Finally, a Senate hearing was set for April 9, 2013, and she and others on the CMS staff had to prepare her for tough questions about the healthcare program’s roll out.

    Tavenner assured the panel that software development and testing for HealthCare.gov would be done by September 2013.

    A week later, on April 18, Tavenner’s boss, Katherine Sebelius, secretary of Health and Human Services, delivered a similar message to a House budget panel. She said work on the insurance exchanges was “up and running, and we are on track.”

    These confident public displays masked a different reality.

    Earlier that month, Tavenner and Sebelius had been briefed by an outside consultant about a broad array of risks threatening the October 1 launch of HealthCare.gov.

    The report by the consulting firm McKinsey & Co depicted a tangled, leaderless bureaucracy managing the effort and warned of possible system failures that materialized barely six months later. It blamed tight deadlines, insufficient testing and the absence of a “single, empowered decision-making authority.”

    The report sounded the alarm. Attendees at high-level briefings that followed included Todd Park, the White House chief technology officer, and Brian Sivak, the HHS technology whiz brought in to jumpstart health technology systems.

    The consultants met with Tavenner and Jeanne Lambrew, Obama’s healthcare adviser who, two decades earlier, had worked on a failed healthcare overhaul spearheaded by then-first lady Hillary Clinton.

    Obama also was briefed on McKinsey’s findings, White House press secretary Jay Carney later acknowledged. White House logs show two McKinsey consultants arriving for a meeting on April 8, but the company would not comment on the visit.

    The first public hints of official concern about possible problem’s with Obamacare’s technology actually came on March 22 – before Tavenner and Sebelius had expressed their confidence to Congress and just as McKinsey’s findings began to make their way through the administration.

    At a forum sponsored by America’s Health Insurance Plans, the national trade association representing the health insurance industry, CMS chief technology officer Henry Chao noted that the launch of HealthCare.gov was about 200 days away.

    “I’m pretty nervous – I don’t know about you,” Chao told the group, according to Congressional Quarterly.

    “The time for debating about the size of the text on the screen, or the color, or is it a world-class user experience, that’s what we used to talk about two years ago,” Chao said. “Let’s just make sure it’s not a third-world experience.”

    THINGS FALL APART

    By July, Chao’s concerns had escalated.

    A former Navy avionics technician once billed as a rising federal tech star, his reputation was tied up in the success of a website that was partially built and not yet fully tested.

    His agency already had paid the website’s prime contractor, CGI Federal Inc, nearly $88 million by March 2013. And costs were climbing.

    Chao wrote to colleagues on July 16 to say that he feared CGI could “crash the plane at takeoff,” according to e-mails released by Republican congressional investigators. CGI has declined to comment.

    Alarming assessments streamed in from CMS technical advisers.

    “We believe that our entire build is in jeopardy,” wrote one, referring to the elaborate website construction.

    E-mails flew back and forth between Chao and the contractors until a CGI vice president assured Chao, “I am on top of this.”

    For Chao, meeting the October 1 deadline to have the website functioning well had become a matter of personal honor. Along with Tavenner, he had given sworn testimony to a congressional committee and assured skeptical members that the agency was on track.

    On July 20, Chao urged his staff to redouble its effort and sent a link to his testimony.

    “I wanted to share this with you so you can see and hear that both Marilyn and I, under oath, stated we are going to make October 1,” Chao wrote. He urged them to “put yourself in my shoes” and help him make those words the truth.

    A MAD SCRAMBLE

    As October 1 approached, bleak assessments about the website surfaced everywhere – except from the Obama administration.

    Brett Graham, a partner at the healthcare consultant Leavitt Partners, predicted a rocky enrollment period.

    “The lack of testing and short timelines increases the probability of exchanges experiencing unexpected problems,” he told a House subcommittee on September 10.

    At CMS, system tests during the third week of September were “not good and not consistent at all,” one employee told Chao in an e-mail. At a time when the website should have been able to accommodate 10,000 simultaneous users, it was crashing with 500 simulated users on it – about a week before the site’s scheduled launch. Contractor CGI called the glitches “part of the tuning exercise.”

    Chao shot off an all-caps message to his staff, ordering that tests continue, just five days before the deadline.

    At the White House, technology officer Park questioned Chao about the website’s progress. If Park sensed disaster, he gave no hint.

    “Massive kudos again for the incredible progress the team is making!” Park wrote in an e-mail.

    THE RUSH TO FIX IT

    HealthCare.gov went live on October 1 amid a sea of error messages, blank pages and crashed applications.

    “We are making improvements as we speak,” Tavenner told reporters on a conference call that afternoon.

    The site’s meltdown continued, however. A frustrating month of up-and-down performance prevented many Americans from purchasing insurance. The administration brought in technical advisers to help with an upgrade.

    After a few weeks of stumbling explanations from top officials, Sebelius took responsibility during an October 30 congressional hearing.

    “No one indicated it could possibly go this wrong,” she said. “Hold me accountable for the debacle.”

    Obama apologized on November 14. Compounding the technical problems, Obama’s repeated promise that Americans could keep their existing insurance if they wished proved to be inaccurate. Millions of people with bare-bones policies that did not meet the minimum standards set in the Affordable Care Act lost them.

    Republican critics of Obamacare accused the administration of a lack of transparency.

    “The administration was on track – on track for disaster,” Rep. Fred Upton, the Republican chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee said on November 19. “But stubbornly, they stayed the course.”

    The political damage flowing from the website’s troubles is likely to continue through the 2014 elections. Control of Congress will be at stake, and Republicans have vowed to make Obamacare’s troubled roll out, as symbolized by the botched debut of Healthcare.gov, part of an assault on the healthcare program that they say is too costly and robs Americans of coverage choices.

    The website eventually found its footing.

    As of late Sunday, more than 1 million people had signed up for private coverage through HealthCare.gov, and hundreds of thousands more were expected to do so Monday and Tuesday, just before a deadline to get coverage that starts January 1.

    Even so, the administration’s initial goal of signing up 3.3 million people by the end of December seems out of reach.

    Reuters