Tag: InternationalNews

{{U.S. magazine Time has named Russian President Vladimir Putin on its annual list of the world’s “100 most influential people.}}

Other politicians who made the Time list published this week included U.S. President Barack Obama, Chinese leader Xi Jinping, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un.

Former U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, who provided the write-up on Putin, said Russia’s recent interference in Ukraine has shown that “Putin’s worldview is colored by toxic fictions.”

Putin’s domestic approval ratings have soared after the annexation of Crimea — reaching 80 percent according to a recent survey by independent pollster Levada Center — but “his increased influence will be temporary,” Albright said.

“To some, Putin has ‘won’ Crimea,” she said. “Will he recognize his ‘victory’ is Pyrrhic — or try to repeat it? History is filled with aggressors who triumphed for a moment. Then failed.”

Former Russian oil tycoon Mikhail Khodorkovsky, speaking Thursday in the Ukrainian capital, Kiev, suggested that Moscow’s supposed victory in Crimea may end up eroding Russia’s global influence, and that Putin’s actions in Ukraine aimed to “avenge a personal grudge.”

Last year, both Forbes magazine and British newspaper The Times named Putin “the most influential person of the year.”

Neither Putin nor Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev made Time magazine’s 2013 list, with Rosneft chief executive Igor Sechin the only Russian on the list.

{{A planned visit by the Dalai Lama has Oslo torn between its will to warm up frozen ties with China and warnings from the public not to compromise its stance on human rights.}}

Rather than rolling out the red carpet, the Norwegian authorities seem more inclined to make the Tibetan spiritual leader enter through the back door when he arrives on 7 May for the 25th anniversary of his Nobel Peace Prize.

“We must be aware that, if the Norwegian authorities receive the Dalai Lama, it will be more complicated to normalise our relations,” Foreign Minister Boerge Brende said in parliament this week.

The attribution of the Nobel Peace Prize to Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo in 2010 revived the long-forgotten anger that Beijing expressed when the Tibetan leader received it, bringing bilateral relations to a new low and prompting Chinese leaders to freeze high-level contacts with their Norwegian counterparts.

Oslo’s attempts to normalise relations with the world’s second largest economy have since proven fruitless, as China wants to set an example to deter other countries.

{{On Wednesday, China issued a new warning.}}

“We are firmly opposed to other countries providing a platform for the Dalai Lama’s activities that aim at dividing China, and we oppose foreign leaders meeting him,” foreign ministry spokesperson Qin Gang said.

In order to prevent any escalation, the president of the Norwegian parliament Olemic Thommessen – second only to the king in Norway’s protocol – said he would not meet the Tibetan leader, who was received by Barack Obama last month in the White House.

“Our possibilities to promote these values that are so dear to us don’t benefit from maintaining such a hopeless situation as the one we find ourselves in now,” Thommessen told public broadcaster NRK on Tuesday.

Brende said that no decision had been made regarding a possible meeting between a member of the government and the Dalai Lama, with the ministry stressing that the visit is “private”.

{{‘Empty words’}}

The fact that Brende and Thommessen are former leaders of the parliamentary committee for Tibet, the latter as recently as last year, added to the controversy.

As Norway prepares to celebrate the bicentennial of its constitution on 17 May, several commentators accused its leaders of betraying Norwegian values and letting China dictate their policy.

“The contrast is huge with all the beautiful words the president of the Parliament and others use in this jubilee year,” said Harald Stanghelle, editor-in-chief of Aftenposten, the most respected Norwegian daily, who criticised the authorities’ “cowardice”.

“Words like democracy and independence, freedom of speech and human rights. The announced visit of the Tibetan [leader] proves that these are but empty words.”

According to a survey published by the Verdens Gang tabloid, 60% of Norwegians think that the government should meet the Dalai Lama and 50% said it would be “cowardly” not to do it out of consideration for Beijing.

Only 20% Thommessen’s stand.

“I don’t feel guilty of being cowardly or pathetic,” Thommessen said.

“It is just about assuming one’s responsibilities to … actually improve the chances to work for the values, especially human rights, that we hold dear.”

The current chairperson of the parliamentary committee for Tibet, Ketil Kjenseth, lamented the authorities’ efforts to soothe Beijing.

“In Tibet, the situation in terms of human rights hasn’t changed an inch, but our economic dependence on China got in the way,” he told media, adding that he was determined to receive the Dalai Lama in parliament.

Despite the freeze in diplomatic relations, bilateral trade climbed to a record high last year.

Highlighting the importance of symbols in diplomatic protocol, Kjenseth has not been authorised to hold the meeting in the room he initially suggested.

Among the solutions suggested by the presidency was a room in the basement.

It has also been suggested that the Dalai Lama not use the main entrance to the building, an idea that has brewed up a storm among critics.

– AFP