Tag: GreatLakesNews

  • Museveni meets Rwenzururu royal family

    {The royal family of the Rwenzururu Kingdom met President Museveni on Friday and begged him to release King Charles Wesley Mumbere}

    The royal family of the Rwenzururu Kingdom met President Museveni on Friday and begged him to release King Charles Wesley Mumbere. They also asked the President to “let by bygones be bygones” in the interest of peace in Rwenzori Sub-region.

    The kingdom spokesperson, Mr Clarence Bwambale, confirmed the meeting at State House Entebbe, which discussed dialogue between the government and the kingdom, among other issues relating to the November 27, 2016 attack on the king’s palace that left more than 100 people dead.

    The omusinga (king), together with more than 150 of his subjects [royal guards] are currently on remand at various prisons on charges of treason, murder, terrorism and aggravated robbery, crimes allegedly committed in Kasese District late last year.

    The State minister of Agriculture, who is also the chief prince of the kingdom, Mr Christopher Taban Kibanzanga, told Sunday Monitor that a number of people from the royal family, including former kingdom ministers, Rwenzururu veterans and royal guards met Mr Museveni at 8am and a number of issues were discussed.

    “We met President Museveni and we discussed several issues pertaining the kingdom, the king in prison and his people, issues of peace in Rwenzori sub-region, reconciliations and co-existence and we are still continuing with the negotiations,” Mr Kibanzanga said.

    Other sources told Sunday Monitor that during the meeting, Mr Museveni listened a lot and advised the people of Rwenzori to be peaceful. The President made it clear to the royal family that he wants peace to be restored in the region and asked cultural leaders in the region to adhere to the law and their mandate.

    The meeting was attended by the Rwenzururu queen, Nyabaghole Agnes Ithungu, queen mother Christine Biira, Princess Christine Kibanzanga and Prince William Kibanzanga, eight veterans led by their chairman , Mr Yorum Mulema, Mr Vincent Kapilongo and two royal guards.

    They are expected to meet the President Museveni again tomorrow to continue with the negotiations.

  • Why Kenya may be ill-prepared for elections

    {Although all recent Kenyan elections have shown degrees of unpreparedness, the 2017 elections may end up becoming the most ill-prepared poll the country will have.}

    While the impasse over the fate of the outgoing members of the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission was finally overcome through the Joint Select Committee that the ruling Jubilee and opposition Cord established to address outstanding questions that would allow the elections to go ahead, there had already been substantial delays in getting the country to that point.

    The delay has since been compounded by a series of obstructionist measures that have been witnessed during the implementation of the deal that was agreed by the Joint Select Committee. One of the problems that caused this further stalling was a deadlock in agreeing a package that would constitute a “dignified exit” for the outgoing commissioners, as had been commanded in the agreement between two political parties.

    The agreement provided that the outgoing commissioners could only leave office after new ones were appointed, creating an inbuilt disincentive to hurry the process towards their replacement.

    The plan to appoint new IEBC commissioners also suffered delay when the selection panel was forced to vacate the initial shortlist of applications for the position of chair after the applicants were found to be wanting. The panel then re-advertised the position.

    The work of the selection process has not been without its own controversies. The applicable law required the panel to identify two finalist candidates for the position of chair, for the President to pick one, and a further list of nine candidates out of which the President would fill the six positions of commissioners.

    Questions have been raised over the selection criteria applied both by the President and the panel after relatively lower-ranked candidates were preferred over their better positioned competitors.

    There have also emerged questions as to the suitability of the proposed chair, Wanyonyi Chebukati, following allegations that a law firm he is associated with was involved in unethical practices. The selection panel was placed in the extraordinary situation of taking out paid space in newspapers to defend its selection.

    {{INTRODUCE AMENDMENTS}}

    The new IEBC commissioners will thus take office under some cloud of doubt. Assuming that they receive the approval of the National Assembly, they will have about six months to prepare for the elections, a period that is significantly less than the not-less-than-two-years that was recommended by the Kriegler commission.

    Difficulties in preparing for the elections have significantly been compounded by Jubilee’s decision to introduce amendments to the Election Laws (Amendment) Act, 2016, the law that codified elements of the agreement reached with Cord.

    In the National Assembly, the debate on the amendment was stormy and was characterised by physical confrontations among opposing legislators, as police cordoned off the debating chamber, creating political tension in Parliament and around the country.

    The main grievances by Cord revolved around the speed at which the Speaker of the Assembly seemed prepared to allow the processing of the law, and a view that since the law had been agreed on in a bipartisan process, any amendments should follow the same process.

    A decision by Speaker Justin Muturi to refer the Bill to the Senate for concurrence shifted the attention to the upper house, which also passed the Bill without alteration. The chaotic events that had been witnessed before the Assembly provided the context in which the Senate convened to deliberate on whether to give its concurrence to the Bill.

    The Senate set out to demonstrate a maturity that had lacked when the National Assembly debated the same Bill, with the Senate Speaker Ekwee Ethuro demanding a withdrawal of the police positioned outside the chambers.

    Also, unlike in the National Assembly where debate was rushed, Mr Ethuro demonstrated a willingness to allow for consultations, directing the Legal Affairs committee to arrange sessions for the receipt of public views.

    In the end, however, the debate and vote in the Senate reflected the same partisan positions that had been evident in the National Assembly, a demonstration that the Senate was unable to transcend the political divisions that the Bill had created at all levels. Even the proceedings of the Legal Affairs committee took the same party lines as would later be witnessed during the debate in plenary.

    The opposition attempted to prevent debate in the Senate through a technical interpretation of what a session before Senate meant. However, the Speaker overruled the objection and allowed the debate to proceed.

    While all the public submissions made to the committee opposed the passage of the Bill, these had no persuasive effect and were not even referred to when the vote was eventually taken.

    UGLY PROCEEDINGS
    Ultimately, it will be difficult to avoid the perception that the political establishment used the relative respectability of the Senate to sanitise the ugly proceedings that had taken place in the National Assembly.

    To pass the Bill, the majority needed, and was able to obtain, the 24 votes that constitute a simple majority of the 47 delegations represented in the Senate. On the other hand, the task by the opposition was to prevent the majority from achieving the 24 votes.

    In the end, much turned on the decision on the vote by the delegation from Kisii County, whose leader, Senator Chris Obure, reportedly donated a last-minute proxy in favour of the little-known Senator Hosea Ochwang’i, who cast the Kisii vote in favour of the amendments.

    There were compelling arguments about the need for Senator Ochwang’i to consult with his co-delegate, Janet Ong’era, a requirement of the Constitution, and also about what should be made of the fact that Senator Obure, elected on an ODM ticket, had apparently defected to Jubilee without seeking a fresh mandate from the electorate that constituted his delegation.

    Senator Gideon Moi, who had been expected to vote with the opposition, ended up supporting the Jubilee side. Senators of Kajiado and Narok counties, who had come under pressure from both Jubilee and Cord, stayed away during the vote, thus preserving their neutrality on the debate.

    During the debate, the leadership of Speaker Ethuro was tested when a number of senators claimed that he had allowed a little more time before ordering the closing of the doors that would pave way for the voting to commence, to allow Senator Ochwang’i into the chambers. Claims also surfaced about irregularities affecting the Samburu delegation vote.

    While the Mr Ethuro has avoided the withering criticism that has been reserved for his National Assembly counterpart, there is a sense in which he could have better guided the proceedings during the debate. Viewed in totality, the proceedings before the Senate had a certain sense of inevitability about them.

    In retrospect, it seems that the Senate was set for a pre-determined outcome and that no reason was ever going to be good enough to stop that. Under the circumstances, all the motions before the vote were an act of window dressing, which would not affect the outcome.

    Like the Supreme Court, which had promised so much but ended up delivering so little, the senate finds itself in the same position where, on an issue of some national importance, it was unable to rise to levels of leadership that would help to keep the country together.

    The country goes into elections with Jubilee using its majorities in both houses of Parliament in a crushing manner that has left the opposition badly humiliated, and the country badly divided.

    In the event of a major disagreement going forward, it is difficult to see what authorities remain which can mediate through such a crisis.

    Members of the Senate Legal Affairs and Human Rights Committee during a hearing on the disputed electoral laws at County Hall in December.
  • Tanzania:Financial institutions at risk of cyber-attacks – report

    FINANCIAL institutions worldwide including those in the country have been implored to be extremely cautious of the growing cyber-attacks that put them at great risk this year than before.
    The report further cautions that a slight mistake could cause great cash loss to the financial institutions like what happened to a Bangladesh Bank Central Bank. The Sophos report indicates that financial infrastructure is at greater risk of attack.

    “The use of targeted phishing and ‘whaling’ continues to grow. These attacks use detailed information about company executives to trick employees into paying fraudsters or compromising accounts.

    “We also expect more attacks on critical financial infrastructure, such as the attack involving SWIFTconnected institutions which cost the Bangladesh Central Bank $81 million in February,” reveals the report.

    The caution comes in following a Cybersecurity giant Sophos report published recently shows that the attacks are expected to increase this year.

    Expounding further, the report indicates that the year 2016 saw a huge number and variety of cyber-attacks, ranging from a high-profile DDoS using hijacked Internet-facing security cameras to the alleged hacking of party officials during the US election, according to a report by a Cybersecurity giant Sophos.

    The Sophos report shows that they also saw a rising tide of data breaches from big organisations and small and significant losses of people’s personal information. “Since the year 2016 is over, we’re pondering how some of those trends might play out in 2017,” it notes.

    The report indicates that the current and emerging attack trends include the destructive DDoS IOT attack which is expected to rise. “In 2016, Mirai showed the massive destructive potential of DDoS attacks as a result of insecure consumer IoT (Internet of Things) devices.

    Mirai’s attacks exploited only a small number of devices and vulnerabilities and used basic password guessing techniques,” part of the report indicates.

    However, the report claims that cybercriminals will find it easy to extend their reach because there are so many IoT devices containing outdated code based on poorly-maintained operating systems and applications with well-known vulnerabilities.

    “Expect IoT exploits, better password guessing and more compromised IoT devices being used for DDoS or perhaps to target other devices in your network,” it notes. It shows there is a shift from exploitation to targeted social attacks.

    “Cybercriminals are getting better at exploiting the ultimate vulnerability – humans. Ever more sophisticated and convincing targeted attacks seek to coax users into compromising themselves.

    For example, it’s common to see an email that addresses the recipient by name and claims they have an outstanding debt the sender has been authorised to collect,” explains part of the report.

    It further states that shock, awe or borrowing authority by pretending to be law enforcement are common and effective tactics, saying that the email directs them to a malicious link that users are panicked into clicking on, opening them up to attack.

    “Such phishing attacks can no longer be recognised by obvious mistakes,” it states. SWIFT recently admitted that there have been other such attacks and it expects to see more, stating in a leaked letter to client banks, stating that the threat is very persistent, adaptive and sophisticated – and it is here to stay.

    The Sophos report notes that there is increasing exploitation of the Internet’s inherently insecure infrastructure. All Internet users rely on ancient foundational protocols and their ubiquity makes them nearly impossible to revamp or replace.

    These archaic protocols that have long been the backbone of the Internet and business networks are sometimes surprisingly flaky.

  • Kenya:Universities staff to go on strike Monday after talks collapse

    {The reopening of public universities across the country could be disrupted following the collapse of talks between the government and unions representing lecturers and non-teaching staff.}

    The Kenya Union of Domestic Hotels, Education Health Institutions and Allied workers (KUDHEHIA), the Kenya University Staff Union (KUSU) and University Academic Staff Union (UASU) on Friday evening failed to agree with the government to suspend the strike.

    The union representatives vowed to boycott work beginning January 8 after the Inter-Public Universities Councils Consultative Forum (IPUCCF) failed to offer a counter-proposal for their 2013-2017 collective bargaining agreement (CBA).

    KUDHEHIA Secretary-General Albert Njeru said the unions have ran out of patience, adding that the government has refused to raise their salaries since 2010.

    {{‘PUBLIC-RELATIONS GIMMICKS’}}

    “We are very disappointed with the IPUCCF for doing nothing about the proposal we gave them on December 2012 for the 2013-2017 agreement,” said Mr Njeru.

    UASU Secretary-General Constantine Wasonga, on the other hand, accused IPUCCF chairman Ratemo Michieka of disregarding the CBA by engaging the unions in public-relations gimmicks.

    Dr Wasonga said the government is only trying to buy time because the CBA for 2013-2017 will expire in five months’ time.

    “We will go on strike even if it is for a whole year until the government takes us seriously,” said Dr Wasonga.

    KUSU Secretary-General Charles Mukhwaya also challenged Education Cabinet Secretary Fred Matiang’i to show leadership by ensuring that the crisis is averted.

    The unions cautioned continuing university students not to report to campuses for classes and parents to rethink admission plans for their children, saying the strike would disrupt learning.

    KUSU Secretary-General Charles Mukhwaya (right) addresses the media with UASU Secretary-General Constantine Wasonga (left) and UASU Chairman Muga K’Olale at Merica Hotel in Nakuru on January 6, 2017.
  • Uganda:Finance Minister scraps incentive on rice imports

    {The minister of finance, planning and economic development has instructed the minister of East African community affairs, Mr Kirunda Kivejinja to terminate the rice incentives given to importers.}

    The minister of finance, planning and economic development has instructed the minister of East African community affairs, Mr Kirunda Kivejinja to terminate the rice incentives given to importers.

    The directive which took effect of January 1, 2017 caught the importers unaware forcing some of them to rethink their operations. The importers argue that the directive is unfair and unjust as they were not given due notice to make adjustments in time.

    “All of a sudden the ministry has decided to increase the taxes on husked rice to equal that of already processed rice which is not fair, this is going to drive up prices of rice in the market,” Mr Geoffrey Adito, the director operations at Kingdom Rice said.

    Kingdom Rice is one of the major players in the market controlling a 60 per cent market share. They are also one of the largest importers of husked rice which is processed and packaged at their 500 tonne rice milling plant in Namanve.

    Another major player SWT rice which imports half processed rice from Pakistan says the increase in the tax rate will drive up prices in the local market.

    The rice importers say many of them have their shipments in Mombasa, at sea and as such will suffer huge loses due to the unplanned for directive. They want the government to make a segregation between finished rice and unfinished rice because those who import unfinished rice cannot compete with those already importing the finished product.

    “When we set up the factory, Uganda Investment Authority had told us that there was more than enough supply of rice in the local market. So we mobilised investors, got money and set up a rice mill in three months,” an official from Kingdom Rice said.

    However, when they went out to buy the rice, they bought off 50,000 tonnes of rice in two weeks and there was nothing more to buy in the local market. The 50,000 tonnes could not sustain the plant beyond a month.

    Mr Geoffrey Adito, the Director Operations Kingdom rice said they approached the government with a proposal to import husked rice which would then be processed at the factory. “Government gave us that duty price of $250 (about Shs900,000) per metric tonne and they gave us one year to set up a farm and build local capacity.

    However, after six months without any notice to us we got directives from ministry of finance that on 1st the duty rates were changing,” he said.

    Adito said the directive is going to drive up prices of rice in the market and investors would pull away causing job losses.

    {{Directives in the letter}}

    The letter which was sent to the EAC on 14th December is copied to the Permanent Secretary Ministry of finance, Auditor General’s office, the Accountant General, the Commissioner General Uganda Revenue Authority and the Uganda Development Bank.

    “This is to request you to notify the East African Community Gazzette Legal Notice No. EAC/33/2016 where Uganda was granted a duty to remission to apply the rate of 75 per cent or $250/Metric Tonne on imported rice which has been enjoyed by some rice importers,”

    The letter is also notifying URA to start to effect the directive which seek to reinstate the EAC tax rate charged on every tone of rice imported from the subsidized rate of $250 [about Shs900,000] per tonne to $345 [about Shs1.2million] per metric tonne.

    “Accordingly all importers will pay the same common external tariff (CET) of 75 per cent or $345 per metric tonne of imported rice in accordance with the EAC common external tariff (CET),” the instructions read in part.

    The minister of Finance, Mr Matia Kasaija, in a phone interview with Daily Monitor confirmed to us that he wrote the letter to the Minister of East African Community Affairs. He refused to give any further comments, instead directing us to read the letter that he wrote to the EAC.

    “You read the letter you will find all the answers and details in it,” he said.
    The minister however said that the ministry was going to create a fund for rice commodity development under Uganda Development Bank Limited to benefit all rice millers. When contacted, Ms Amelia Kyambadde the minister of Trade, Industry and Cooperatives said she will have to study the termination letter further and also ascertain how many people were importing the rice and would be affected by the directive so as to avoid distorting production and prices of rice in the market.

    “I will study the issue further however, the termination of importing rice is good for promotion of local production and encouraging local production as opposed to importing what can be grown here,” she said.

    Other experts from the ministry who did not want to be mentioned because of the sensitivity of the matter said the move was good for the country and that initially the ministry of trade had made a mistake which it was correcting.

    However, according to statistics from ministry of trade Uganda consumes about 300,000 tonnes of rice a year and this demand has largely been supplemented by imported rice.

  • Tanzania:Caritas workers still in Malawi prison

    {The fate of eight Tanzanians who were arrested in Malawi late last year suspected to be spying in that country’s uranium mine still hangs in balance with efforts still underway to release them from Mzuzu Prison where they are being held.}

    Foreign Affairs and East African Cooperation Minister, Dr Augustine Mahiga, told the ‘Daily News on Saturday’ yesterday that the Tanzanian government was still in touch with authorities in Lilongwe on the release of the Tanzanians.

    “There is no new information yet in regard to this matter. Our diplomatic mission in Lilongwe is still working on it,” Dr Mahiga said in a telephone interview.

    Reports from Malawi had indicated that the Tanzanians were to be arraigned on January 4, this year, for criminal trespass at the Kayerekera uranium mine.

    Early this week, Malawi’s Songwe border in-charge Yusuf Shaibu and Tanzania’s Kasumulu border Deputy Immigration Officer Daniel Magwaza and his assistant John Njirakiza held discussions with Malawi security agents from Karonga at Songwe border.

    On Thursday, last week, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation, explained in a statement that the eight Tanzanians are workers of Caritas Tanzania, an aid agency of the Catholic Church.

    The officials are based in Songea, Ruvuma Region. Media reports from Malawi last week alleged that authorities in that country had arrested eight Tanzanian ‘spies’ near the Kayerekera uranium mine.

  • Ethnic clash in DRC kills 16 civilians

    {Since 2013 hundreds of clashes reported between ethnic Pygmy and Bantu groups in DRC’s southeastern region.}

    A total of 16 civilians were killed and over 40 others injured in clashes between indigenous Pygmies and ethnic Bantu majority in southeastern Democratic Republic of Congo, officials told Anadolu Agency Friday.

    Richard Ngoy Kitangala, governor of the Tanganyika province, said several houses were also burnt during the clash that took place on Thursday.

    Meanwhile, Moise Kiluba — head of a local civil society organization — said 16 Bantus were killed, 42 others injured and some 69 houses burnt.

    Local civil society organizations say the conflict is driven by inequalities between the two groups. Pygmies say they have been marginalized and discriminated for decades by the Bantu population.

    Since 2013 hundreds of clashes have taken place between the two ethnic groups, which have forced thousands of people to flee.

    In 2015 at least 30 Pygmies were killed in an attack by members of the ethnic Bantu majority in the northern part of Katanga region, southern DRC.

  • Burundi opposition wants new mediator for crisis talks

    {Opposition CNARED group urges Ugandan president to immediately replace current facilitator after ‘failure’ in peace talks.}

    Burundian opposition has called on the Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni to appoint a new facilitator in mediation efforts to end the country’s political crisis.

    The opposition accused Benjamin Mkapa, facilitator of the Burundi peace talks and former Tanzanian president, of supporting the government.

    “CNARED is asking the mediator of the Burundi crisis, Yoweri Museveni, to enter into consultation with the other heads of state of the East African Community (EAC) to find a new facilitator,” it said in a statement late Thursday.

    Pending the appointment of a new facilitator, CNARED called on Mkapa to cease all efforts in organizing further inter-Burundian dialogue.

    “Mkapa disqualified himself. He violated the basic principles of a facilitator that is to say impartiality and neutrality,” the statement said.

    It also called on the African Union and the United Nations to support the new facilitator.

    “Given the lack of effectiveness of Mkapa’s facilitation, CNARED asks that the future facilitator should be assisted by an AU and UN team with negotiating experts and linguistically able to communicate easily with the parties,” the statement said.

    In December the CNARED called on Mkapa to resign after he said Burundi President Pierre Nkurunziza was legitimate.

    Mkapa was appointed facilitator of Burundi peace talks in March 2016.

    Meanwhile, the bureau of facilitation is busy preparing for a new round of Burundi peace talks scheduled for January. Mkapa had earlier said that the solution to the Burundian crisis will be found in June 2017.

    The violence that erupted in April 2015 in Burundi has led to the death of about 1,000 people and forced over 310,000 more to flee the country and seek refuge in neighboring states, according to a report issued last November by the International Federation of Human Rights.

  • DRC political crisis: a timeline of events and the Church’s ‘saviour’ role

    {Political stakeholders in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) are finetuning modalities of a political deal brokered by a non-political group – the Catholic bishops of the National Episcopal Conference of the Congo (CENCO).}

    CENCO’s decision to open a new dialogue despite a deal reached by the African Union mediator turned out to be more durable. The Edem Kodjo led process was boycotted by the main opposition parties hence it was seen as carrying relatively lesser weight.

    The CENCO deal agreed on December 31, 2016 practically snatches the country from the brink of increased instability. The lead up to the deal was bloody with heavy security clampdown on protesters insisting that incumbent Kabila steps down.

    I am a Congolese citizen, I will go home and I am running for president. The charges of plotting against the government are a distraction.
    In the end, the opposition gets two main ‘victories.’ That Kabila agrees to step down with polls to be held later this year and more importantly, that he cannot change the constitution to allow him to run for a third term.

    We present a sequence of the major events from 2015 till date.

    January 17, 2015 – With about two years to the expiration to Kabila’s mandate, the parliament passed a bill that allowed him to extend his mandate beyond 2016.

    January 19-22 – There were clashes between anti-Kabila protesters and security forces in the capital Kinshasa and other towns. Dozens were reported dead and several others arrested.

    Note: The government sought to justify the law allowing Kabila to continue in power with the excuse that a new voters register was needed for general elections and that it would take time to compile. DRC is a country of an estimated 70 million people.

    A planned census for 2015 has yet to take place. Joseph Kabila took over after the assassination of his father Laurent Kabila. He has been in power for about 15 years and his second and final term ended on December 20, 2016.

    April 2016 – Darryl Lewis, an American security aide of Mosie Katumbi, a former governor and ally of Kabila was arrested during a street protest and detained together with three other members of Katumbi’s entourage in the southern city of Lubumbashi.

    May 2016 – Katumbi, the former governor of Katanga province declared presidential intentions. He was and is still seen as a strong opposition candidate. Katumbi joined opposition ranks in September 2015.

    May 11, 2016 – A constitutional court ruled that Kabila can stay on when mandate expires till successor is elected.

    Later in May – Katumbi , owner and bankroller of TP Mazembe football club, appeared before a prosecutor in Lubumbashi over charges of hiring mercenaries. His security aide was subsequently freed and ordered out of the DRC.

    Katumbi left the DRC to South Africa before being flown to Europe to seek medical treatment after he inhaled tear gas fumes fired by police when he appeared before the prosecutor with his supporters to answer to the ‘mercenaries’ charges.

    June 2016 – Katumbi was jailed 36 months in absentia and fined $6m in a property appropriation case. His lawyers claimed the courts’ ruling was part of a political distraction meant to derail his ambitions.

    June 10, 2016 – Katumbi with leading opposition figure, Etienne Tshisekedi decide to set up an opposition coalition.

    July 2016 – Tsisekedi returns to DRC after two years in Belgium, he demands elections and Kabila’s exit while speaking to a huge section of his supporters.

    July 2016 – the electoral body entered an agreement with a Dutch outfit, Gemalto, to help with the compilation of a biometric register and the conduct of its next elections. According to Corneille Nangaa, President of CENI, “We needed a reliable partner to facilitate our ambitious program, which we expect will enroll up to 45 million voters.”

    August 2016 – The Electoral body (CENI) says polls are only possible by April 2018. The Independent National Electoral Commission (CENI) cited lack of funding and delays in voter registration as the major factors behind the postponement.

    September 19–20, 2016 – Main opposition party calls for protests three months to Kabila’s tenure expiration. Scores dead as police apply ‘brutal’ force according to the United Nations and human rights groups.

    October 17, 2016 – DRC’s constitutional court allows CENI to postpone November polls and ordered the immediate roll out of a new calendar for the next elections.

    The last calender they presented indicated that a credible voters register will be ready in July 2017 after which they need over 500 days to organize polls in July 2018. The parliamentary majority and breakaway faction of opposition agree poll extension to April 2018.

    AU backed deal is reached with Edem Kodjo as facilitator but main opposition refused participation from day 1. As part of the deal, Prime Minister Matata Ponyo resigns and opposition candidate Samy Badibanga is named new Prime Minister.

    Katumbi told the British broadcaster, BBC in October that he will run for president, ‘‘I am a Congolese citizen, I will go home and I am running for president. The charges of plotting against the government are a distraction,” he emphasized.

    The Church’s ‘saviour’ role

    The CENCO who were earlier part of the AU mediation pulled out after the September clashes saying it wanted ‘‘to mourn dead protesters,’‘ also at some point they warned that a deal that keeps Kabila in office beyond 2017 will not be acceptable.

    December 8, 2016 – CENCO opens fresh dialogue to set up transitional authority until polls can definitively be held – target reaching a deal by middle of December.

    December 12, 2016 – The US and EU sanctioned top officials of the regime for complicity in using deadly force on protesters.

    December 15, 2016 – Bloomberg releases Kabila family’s business interests in the country links to why he doesn’t want to leave. Claimed that since the end of the civil war in 2003, the family of the Kabila is reported to have flourished by owning at least 70 companies.

    According to a the Bloomberg report published on Thursday, December 15, 2016, the scope the Kabila empire has recently become visible after Congolese regulators computerized and made corporate and government records publicly available.

    December 17, 2016 – Church suspended talks till after expiration of Kabila’s mandate in three days’ time (December 20)

    December 20–22, 2016 – A new round of protests as Kabila’s mandate expires, groups ‘‘bye-bye Kabila’‘ and ‘‘Filimbi’‘ were rounded up. Some were later released whiles others were jailed.

    In Goma, Lubumbashi, Kinshasa, violent clashes between security and protesters led to deaths. Kabila’s spokesman a day after his mandate expired said ‘‘nothing changes and that he (Kabila) was still in charge. A new cabinet was also named with Badibanga as PM.

    CENCO resumed negotiations with the hope of a deal by Christmas. A deal was announced by opposition members but it wasn’t corroborated by the government, the negotiators said some other fine details were being ironed out and that they were close.

    On the last day of the year 2016, the church officially announced a deal. Its major conditionality being that Kabila agrees to leave office by end of 2017 contrary to 2018 as earlier projected. That he cannot under any circumstance be a candidate as says the constitution.

    January 1 – CENCO accord was signed by all stakeholders. Between January and when Kabila exits, he will be president but a transitional body will be set up to be led by Tshisekedi and a new opposition prime minister will be named.

  • Kasese clashes: Museveni, two security officers reported to ICC

    {The complaint dated December 9, 2016, is against President Museveni in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief of armed forces, Brig Peter Elwelu, and Assistant Inspector General of Police Asuman Mugenyi.}

    A group of MPs from the Rwenzori sub-region have lodged a complaint before the International Criminal Court (ICC), seeking to move the office of the chief prosecutor to commence investigations into the raid on King Charles Mumbere’s palace in which at least 100 people died.

    The complaint dated December 9, 2016, is against President Museveni in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief of armed forces, Brig Peter Elwelu, and Assistant Inspector General of Police Asuman Mugenyi.

    “Brig Elwelu kept on saying he was acting on the orders of the Commander-in-Chief who is President Museveni, and Deputy Inspector General of Police Asuman Mugenyi, who physically commanded the bloody operation,” Ms Winnie Kiiza, the Leader of Opposition in Parliament, told the media in Kampala yesterday.

    Contents of the compliant claim that President Museveni, Brig Elwelu and AIGP Mugenyi were actively in direct command of the joint forces and also reportedly set an ultimatum for the royal guards of King Mumbere to surrender or face fire.

    The complaint also states that people who died in the clashes include royal guards, children, and domestic workers at the palace, women and other visitors to the palace. It also lists property reportedly destroyed in the raid as including the coronation house, the kingdom’s regalia, the kingdom’s parliament, the kingdom documents and other cultural items.

    Ms Kiiza, who was flanked by other MPs, including Centenary Robert (Kasese Municipality), Nzoghu William (Busongora East), Katusabe Atkins, ( Busongora West), Niwagaba Wilfred, (Ndorwa East), also justified their lodging of the compliant before the ICC and not with Ugandan courts. “The ICC has mandate to complement existing national judicial systems and it is the proper court where national courts are unable to prosecute high ranking criminals..” reads part the petition.

    Petition defended
    The complaint further reads: “It is the complainant’s contention that there cannot be any credible investigations by the State authorities in Uganda, particularly the State security forces in crimes committed by them and there cannot also be credible proceedings when the government is sitting in its own cause.”

    Asked whether individuals can file cases at The Hague-based court, Mr Samuel Muyizzi, the lawyers of the MPs, explained that the Rome Statute allows individuals to file cases before the court as long as they fall under the category of crimes against humanity, war crimes and genocide coupled with evidence to back up their claims. However, ICC stressed that the lodging of the compliant does not mean that investigations into the Kasese clashes have commenced.

    Speaking to NTV, the executive director Uganda Media Centre, Mr Ofwono Opondo said: “…such a case should be presented to ICC through the Attorney General and the Solicitor General. Government was rescuing the freedom of Ugandans and the independence of Uganda because there were some people who had created camps and were training people who had started killing police, army and locals.”

    Yesterday, senior presidential press secretary Don Wanyama said: “Whatever the President does is constitutional, but for better explanation on the issues to do with ICC, kindly contact the Attorney General.” Attempts to get a comment from the Attorney General, Mr William Byaruhanga, were futile by press time since his known telephone number was unavailable.