Category: Politics

  • Dutch firmly reject EU-Ukraine ties in referendum

    Voters in the Netherlands resoundingly said “no” to EU-Ukraine pact, dealing an embarrassing blow to the government.

    Dutch voters have rejected a key European pact with Ukraine in a referendum seen as a barometer of anti-EU feeling, dealing an embarrassing blow to the government.

    In a result swiftly hailed by eurosceptic groups, the Dutch news agency ANP said the “no” camp had won the day with 61.1 percent. Only 38 percent voted in favour of the two-year-old treaty with Kiev.

    After initial doubts, ANP said that 32.2 percent of the electorate had turned out, meaning the ballot is valid and must be considered by the coalition government of Prime Minister Mark Rutte.

    “It looks like the Dutch people said NO to the European elite and NO to the treaty with the Ukraine. The beginning of the end of the EU,” far-right politician Geert Wilders said late on Wednesday.

    Voters were asked if they supported the European Union’s association agreement with Ukraine, which aims to foster better trade relations with the war-torn country and former Soviet satellite.

    Ukraine’s President Petro Poroshenko on Thursday said his country would continue moving towards the EU despite the resounding rejection.

    Poroshenko downplayed the importance of the referendum but said Ukraine should “take it into consideration”.

    Many Ukrainian politicians feel their country deserves the treaty and are keen to show they have made progress in aligning their country with EU standards since the 2014 uprising that toppled pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovich.

    Bas Paternotte, a columnist for right-wing weblog GeenStijl, said Ukraine is not a suitable partner for the EU.

    “That country is not ready,” Paternotte told Al Jazeera. “It’s sad for all those young people who fought for their freedom during the revolution but the country is a mess. Government-sponsored mobs are walking around with swastika flags; (President) Poroshenko has been named in the Panama Papers. Ukraine is unfinished,” he added.

    But organisers admitted the non-binding ballot was essentially about pushing a broader anti-EU agenda – humiliating at the very time that the Netherlands holds the rotating EU presidency.

    Vote could boost far-right

    The Dutch “no” poses a major headache for the European Union as it also gears up for the ramifications of a possible British exit from the bloc.

    The Netherlands is now the only member in the 28-nation EU not to have ratified the Ukraine accord which has already been given the thumbs up by both the upper and lower houses of the Dutch parliament.

    Rutte agreed “the ‘no’ camp won convincingly”.

    And he was forced to concede that “if the turnout is above the (30 percent) margin then this accord cannot be ratified as is.”

    He had earlier urged voters to vote in favour of the pact with Kiev saying “we have to help Ukraine build up a judicial state and its democracy.”

    “Europe needs more stability at its edges.”

    It remains unclear what will happen next, with Rutte vowing a “step-by-step” approach in full consultation with the government and Brussels.

    Official full results are only due on April 12.

    The vote is non-binding. But it could mean that the coalition government – already under fire due to the refugee crisis – will seek to opt out of certain provisions of the EU-Ukraine deal to satisfy the voters.

    It could also boost Wilders’s Freedom Party (PVV) which is already riding high in the polls due to his stand against migrants.

    ‘Sun setting on EU’

    The leaders of the Netherlands’ six largest parties all agreed on Wednesday the country could not just ratify the agreement with Ukraine.

    “The accord cannot just be ratified. We have to take into account this ‘no’ vote,” said Diederik Samsom, the Labour Party leader which is Rutte’s junior ruling coalition partner.

    The “no” camp had highlighted concerns about corruption in Ukraine, and continuing separatist unrest in the east, among reasons to refuse closer ties with Kiev.

    The outcome was a blow to the government of Mark Rutte at the very time it holds the rotating EU presidency

  • Libya government: Tripoli ‘U-turn’ over stepping aside

    The head of a coalition ruling western Libya and the capital, Tripoli, appears to have reversed a decision to dismiss his administration.

    The statement, posted on Khalifa Ghweil’s website, has caused confusion.

    In it he threatens to prosecute any of his ministers who co-operate with the leaders of a UN-back unity government waiting to take national control.

    Tripoli’s justice ministry had said earlier that ministers were standing aside to prevent further bloodshed.

    The UN-brokered unity deal, agreed in December, is aimed at reconciling splits after five years of conflict.

    Libya has been in chaos since the 2011 overthrow of long-serving ruler Muammar Gaddafi by Nato-backed forces.

    Since 2014 the country has had two competing administrations, the one in Tripoli, which is backed by powerful militias, and the other about 1,000km (620 miles) away in the eastern port city of Tobruk.

    Some rival lawmakers signed up to the UN agreement to form a unity government but the deal has not yet been backed by all the country’s many militia brigades that formed after the uprising.

    The Tobruk-based administration, formed by a parliament chosen in national elections in June 2014, is split over its backing for the unity government.

    It is not uncommon in Libya to get contradictory statements within the space of minutes or hours from an institution or official.

    In the broader context of developments this month, the two statements published by members of the Tripoli-based administration are indicative of a split within this group and its militia backers – as well as what looks like a last-ditch effort to remain in power.

    This is because many stand to lose their privileges with the new unity government trying to take the helm.

    Nevertheless it remains unclear who is in charge given the claims and counter-claims. We are likely to see more of this posturing until the UN-backed government is able to assert itself.

    Speaking to the BBC, a Tripoli government adviser said, “Things are not clear at the moment.”

    In his statement, Mr Ghweil warned ministers in his National Salvation Government: “Given the requirements of public interest… you are requested to continue your mission in accordance with the law.”

    Leaders of the unity government, known as the Presidency Council led by Fayez Sarraj, arrived in Tripoli a week ago and have been operating from a naval base.
    At the time Mr Ghweil said they were not welcome and urged them to “surrender” or return to Tunisia where they had been based for the last few months.

    Western countries want the unity government to unite as many factions in Libya as possible against an increasingly powerful affiliate of the group known as Islamic State.

    The UN says it is considering lifting sanctions on Libya’s estimated $67bn (£46.8bn) sovereign wealth fund if it can regain control of the country.

    Khalifa Ghweil has been among hardliners who have been opposed the UN-brokered unity deal

  • Sudan’s Omar al-Bashir ‘to step down in 2020’

    Sudan’s President Omar al-Bashir has told the BBC he will step down in 2020 when his current mandate ends.

    Mr Bashir also denied allegations of abuses perpetrated by the Sudanese forces in renewed violence against black African villages who took up arms in the country’s western Darfur region.

    The president has been indicted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) on counts of genocide and war crimes.

    Mr Bashir has been in power since 1989. He won elections in April last year.
    He told the BBC’s Thomas Fessy that his job was “exhausting” and his current term would be his last.

    “In 2020, there will be a new president and I will be an ex-president,” he said.

    However, sceptics will say that he had already pledged to step down in the past and later went back on his word, our correspondent says.

    ‘No aerial bombing’

    The UN says more than 2.5 million people have been displaced in Darfur since 2003 – with more than 100,000 this year alone.

    President Bashir said that there was no reason for the UN peacekeepers and aid workers to stay in the troubled Darfur region.

    He denied reports of recent abuses in the mountains of Jebel Marra where government forces launched an offensive in January.

    “All these allegations are baseless, none of these reports is true,” he said.
    “We challenge anyone to visit the areas recaptured by the armed forces, and find a single village that has been torched.

    “In fact, there hasn’t been any aerial bombing.”

    The president said that people who fled the fighting had gone to government-controlled areas which was “proof that the government does not target citizens”.

    President Bashir said that UN estimates that more than 100,000 people have been displaced in Darfur since January because of the fighting were “highly inflated and not real”.

    “Only a very small number of people have been displaced and they have either reached our positions or [gone to] where the UN peacekeepers [Unamid] are deployed.

    The president said that UN forces and Unamid “have no vital role to play” in Darfur, “not even in defending themselves and their units”.

    “As peace has returned to Darfur, I think that they have no role to undertake and that’s why we want them to leave.”

    Likewise he said there was no role in the region for aid workers because there is no food crisis in Darfur.

    He said that estimates that 2.5 million people were living in camps in Darfur were “much too inflated” and the true figure is closer to 160,000.

    The president dismissed the ICC as a “politicised tribunal” and that evidence of his popularity in Sudan could clearly be seen by the huge crowds that greet him.

    “These are the same crowds I’m accused of having committed genocide and ethnic cleansing against. This is why I’ve defied the tribunal, and [why] I’ve been travelling freely around the world.”

    Mr Bashir was re-elected last year with about 94% of the vote in an election boycotted by the main opposition parties who said it was not free and fair.

    The president said that evidence of popularity in Sudan could clearly be seen the huge crowds that greeted him everywhere

  • Libya’s Tripoli authority rejects UN-backed government

    Contrary to earlier reports, Tripoli-based PM Khalifa Ghweil refuses to cede power to UN-backed unity government.

    Libya’s new unity government has been thrown into chaos, as the head of its rival Tripoli-based authority apparently refused to cede power.

    Contradicting an earlier announcement that his National Salvation Government was ready to step aside, Tripoli’s unrecognised Prime Minister Khalifa Ghweil urged his ministers not to stand down in a statement on Wednesday.

    “Given the requirements of public interest… you are requested to continue your mission in accordance with the law,” he said, threatening to prosecute anyone working with the new government.

    The reason for the U-turn was not immediately clear, but suggests a split within the Tripoli authority that seized the city two years ago forcing out the internationally recognised government.

    The move derails a United Nations push to end the instability that has ripped Libya apart for five years, one day before its envoy Martin Kobler reports to the Security Council on his progress.

    Moments before Ghweil’s statement, Kobler had urged a rapid and complete handover of power to the unity government, warning that a fragile peace in Tripoli may not hold if the new government were unable to deliver.

    The UN envoy had also called on Libya’s internationally recognised eastern parliament to hold a long-sought vote on whether to approve the UN-backed Government of National Accord, and said that the chamber risked being sidelined if it failed to do so, according to Reuters news agency.

    Ghweil’s administration seized Tripoli in mid-2014 with the support of powerful regional militias, forcing the government backed by the international community to flee to the country’s far east.

    Sarraj’s Government of National Accord was created under a power-sharing deal agreed by rival politicians in December.

    He arrived in Tripoli under escort by sea last week, established his headquarters at a naval base and had been moving to bolster his authority.

    UN envoy to Libya Martin Kobler has worked to encourage both the Tripoli-based and Tobruk-based governments to step aside

  • We can’t impose AU force on Burundi, says Buhari

    President Muhammadu Buhari on Tuesday said since the Burundian President Pierre Nkurunziza has rejected the proposal of a stabilising force from the African Union for his country that was currently witnessing political crisis, the idea could not be imposed on the country.

    Buhari therefore urged the people and government of Burundi to explore dialogue in resolving the current political differences in the country.

    According to a statement by his Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, Mr. Femi Adesina, the President spoke while receiving the former Burundian President, Mr. Pierre Buyoya, at the Presidential Villa, Abuja.

    He said Nigeria would continue to support peace processes in the continent through the AU which had already intervened in Burundi.

    ‘‘Nigeria has been playing a key role in the continent through the AU. We participated fully in ensuring a truce in Mali, and we want citizens to enjoy the impact of the truce, although the terrorists are not helping matters,” he said.

    ‘‘Nigeria is always committed to regional and continental peace, and we will continue to do our best.’’

    The President told the former President of Burundi, who is the High Representative of the AU Mission to Mali and the Sahel, that he remained hopeful that there would be an amicable solution to the situation in Burundi.

    In his remarks, the former President commended Nigeria for the role it played in restoring peace to Mali, adding that the AU was working to promote security in the Sahel, particularly through fighting trans-border terrorism.

    He also urged Nigeria to use its clout to work for peace in Burundi, warning that the “country is gradually inching towards a civil war.”

    President Muhammadu Buhari.

  • Ted Cruz, Bernie Sanders win Wisconsin

    Cruz’s win in the Badger State is a serious blow to Trump and could alter the trajectory of the Republican race.

    Republican Ted Cruz and Democratic challenger Bernie Sanders snatched victories in the crucial Wisconsin presidential primary Tuesday, sending a message to frontrunners Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton that their march to the nominations are not foregone conclusions.

    US networks including Fox News and NBC called the race for the two underdogs within half an hour of polls closing in the Midwestern state that borders Canada.

    With seven per cent of precincts reporting, Cruz, a conservative senator from Texas, was ahead with 49 per cent of the vote compared to 35 per cent for billionaire Trump.

    Ohio Governor John Kasich was a distant third at 14 per cent.

    Cruz’s win in the Badger State is a serious blow to Trump and could alter the trajectory of the Republican race.

    The New York real estate mogul predicted a surprise win Tuesday in Wisconsin, but now faces a narrower path to victory and the 1,237 delegates needed to sew up the Republican nomination.

    Tuesday also cements Cruz’s status as the leading anti-Trump candidate, with Kasich far back in the nomination battle.

    On the Democratic side, Vermont Senator Sanders led with 57 per cent versus 43 per cent for Clinton.

    But the former secretary of state can look forward with some confidence to the upcoming races.

    She leads Sanders by double digits in New York, her adopted home state which votes April 19, and Pennsylvania, which casts ballots a week later.

    Trump also leads handily in his home state of New York and in Pennsylvania.

    Republican presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz celebrates with his wife Heidi at the American Serb Hall Banquet Center after the polls closed on April 5, 2016 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

  • Trump, Clinton seek upsets in Wisconsin

    The potentially pivotal contest is the first after a 10-day lull in the process.

    Voters in the state of Wisconsin cast ballots on Tuesday in US presidential primary races in which challengers to Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Hillary Clinton seem poised to win.

    The potentially pivotal contest is the first after a 10-day lull in the process that determines the parties’ nominees for the November general election. Voting began at 7 am (1200 GMT).

    Mr Trump’s main rival Senator Ted Cruz is eyeing the Badger State as a crucial firewall against the celebrity billionaire’s march to an outright nomination victory.

    But should Mr Trump, who is riding a wave of anti-establishment anger, manage to snatch a surprise victory there, he could snuff out Mr Cruz’s campaign.

    “If we do well here, folks, it’s over,” he claimed at a campaign stop Monday in the town of La Crosse.

    Like Mr Trump, Mrs Clinton risks losing Wisconsin, where she faces a surging Bernie Sanders who has won five of the last six contests.

    UPCOMING CONTESTS

    But April could ultimately prove a sunny month for the former secretary of state. She leads Sanders by double digits in New York, which votes on April 19, and Pennsylvania, which casts ballots a week later.

    Mr Trump, the 69-year-old real estate mogul from New York, also leads handily in those states.

    Wisconsin, the birthplace of the Republican Party, is seen as Ground Zero for the anti-Trump movement.

    Halting him there would bolster Cruz, the 45-year-old conservative senator from Texas.

    For Cruz, “it’s a very important win. For Mr Trump, it’s not a critical loss,” University of Iowa professor Timothy Hagle told AFP. However, Trump has been in damage control this past week.

    Although his campaign had recently seemed bulletproof, his latest controversial statements – on abortion, Mr Cruz’s wife and a journalist who said she was roughed up by Trump’s campaign manager – have further alienated women voters, polls indicate.

    Mr Cruz tried to cash in on Trump’s recent campaign gaffes that seem to be alienating women voters.

    Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks to supporters at a campaign stop on April 4, 2016 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

  • ANC backs Zuma as opposition calls for his impeachment

    Democratic Alliance is making a third bid to have the ANC leader removed.

    South Africa’s ruling African National Congress (ANC) has, once again, jumped to President Jacob Zuma’s defence saying there was no basis for Wednesday’s planned motion to remove him.

    The opposition Democratic Alliance (DA) is making a third bid within six months to have the ANC leader impeached.

    The motion was to be debated on Tuesday in Parliament. The DA brought the motion after the Constitutional Court found that President Zuma’s failure to comply with the Public Protector’s remedial action was inconsistent with his Constitutional obligation.

    ANC Secretary-General Gwede Mantashe insisted that constitutionally there was no basis to remove the president. “In our view there is no basis for the proposal to impeach….because the provision of impeachment in the constitution is given conditions, that is why when in talks about contravention the degree in the emphasis in law makes a big difference, so from where we are seated there is no basis for that motion,” he said.

    The ANC’s 20-member National Working Committee (NWC) held a closed meeting in Cape Town until midnight on Monday to discuss the matter. The NWC is responsible for the day-to-day running of the party.

    The committee accepted the president’s apology over the controversial matter of his Nkandla rural home in KwaZulu-Natal province. “The NWC accepted the fact that the president apologised and said that it is humility that is necessary for any leader to apologise.

    STAND UP AND APOLOGISE

    It’s not an easy thing to stand up and apologise,” Mr Mantashe said.

    President Zuma apologised in a national television address on Friday for the “frustration and confusion” caused by the affair, but made it clear that he had no intention of responding to calls to resign.

    (READ: Pressure mounts on President Zuma to quit)

    He said he would pay back some of the money as ordered.

    The DA has called on ANC MPs to join them to remove President Zuma saying the matter transcends party politics and affects all South Africans.

    ANC caucus spokesperson Moloto Mothapo said the expectation is that members of parliament will be voting in line with party affiliations.

    “No member of any political party since 1994 has ever voted differently from the party line. Even those opposition parties, they will be voting in accordance with their party line. Why would they expect differently from the ANC? ”

    It is unlikely that Zuma will be in parliament for the debate, which means that it might escape the chaotic scenes which have regularly erupted when he is present.

    South African President and African National Congress leader, Jacob Zuma, answering questions from Parliament Members at the South African General Assembly in Cape Town on March 17, 2016.

  • Yemeni parties welcome cabinet reshuffle

    Yemeni parties welcome cabinet reshuffle

    A 10-member political group supports appointments of new vice president and prime minister ahead of planned peace talks.

    A group of Yemeni political parties, organisations and forces has welcomed a cabinet reshuffle, offering its “utmost support” to President Abd-Rabbu Mansour Hadi.

    The 10-member group said in a statement on Monday it “completely supports” the appointments of General Ali Mohsen al-Ahmar as the new vice president, and Ahmed Obeid bin Daghr as the new prime minister.

    They will replace Khaled Bahah, who held both posts.

    The reshuffle, announced a day earlier by President Hadi, reinforced “national and political unity”, the group said in the statement, a copy of which was sent to Al Jazeera.

    The signing parties included The Southern Movement and The General People’s Congress.

    The statement came as a UN-brokered ceasefire is planned in the coming days between Yemen’s warring parties, which is expected to pave the way for the peace talks due to be held in Kuwait on April 18.

    The reshuffle boosted the push for peace in the conflict-torn country and would “facilitate the success of the upcoming Kuwait negotiations”, the statement said.

    The group also expressed its “appreciation and profound gratitude” to the Saudi-led coalition, including the United Arab Emirates, “for their continuing support for the Yemeni people, Yemen’s political leadership and national government in order to end the coup, restore the state’s authority and reconstruct the country.”

    “The welfare of Yemenis, security, reconstruction and the building of a modern, democratic, civil unionist state were the foundations of the republic’s values and the principles and objectives of the Yemeni revolution,” the statement continued.

    The Yemeni conflict intensified in March last year, after Iran-allied Houthi fighters and soldiers loyal to Ali Abdullah Saleh – the former Yemeni president – swept across southern Yemen, taking the port city of Aden and forcing President Hadi into exile.

    An Arab military coalition began an air campaign on March 26, 2015 to overthrow Houthi rebels.

    In October, the coalition began sending regular ground troops to help Hadi loyalists secure their gains, including the recently recaptured Aden.

    Five years ago, the Yemeni capital Sanaa echoed with thousands of people calling for President Ali Abdullah Saleh to step down and demand regime change.

    Inspired by the Arab Spring revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt, protests continued for months.

    Emboldened by the political infighting, the Houthis took control of the capital, Sanaa, in September 2014.

    Politically powerful army general General Ali Mohsen al-Ahmar, pictured, has been appointed as Yemen's new prime minister

  • Kenya’s William Ruto due to hear war crimes case ruling

    Kenya’s William Ruto due to hear war crimes case ruling

    Kenyan Vice-President William Ruto is due to find out whether a crimes against humanity case against him will be thrown out by judges at the International Criminal Court (ICC).

    Mr Ruto denies murder, deportation and persecution charges during violence that followed the 2007 elections in which about 1,200 people were killed.

    His lawyers want the case to be terminated due to a lack of evidence.

    Mr Ruto is one of the most senior politicians to be tried by the ICC.

    The prosecution case against him has been dogged by repeated setbacks.

    In February judges at the ICC barred the use of recanted testimony, meaning that prior recorded witness statements could not be used by prosecutors.

    Several key witnesses in the case have changed their statements, which prosecutors said was due to intimidation and bribery.

    Mr Ruto’s lawyers say he should be acquitted because so many key prosecution witnesses have either dropped or changed their original statements.

    ICC prosecutor Fatou Bensouda has acknowledged that the loss of witnesses has weakened the case against the deputy president – but she has argued there still remains enough evidence to proceed with the trial.

    A spokesman for the ICC has told the BBC’s Anna Holligan in The Hague there are a number of possible scenarios.

    The judges could clear Mr Ruto of all the charges, they may ask the prosecution to consider changing the charges or they could reject the defence team’s arguments and allow the trial to continue.

    In 2014, the prosecutor dropped similar charges against Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta, alleging that witnesses had been intimidated to make them change their testimony.

    The future of the case now appears to depend on whether the prosecution has proved that it has sufficient evidence to offset a no-case-to-answer move from Mr Ruto’s lawyers.

    The use of prior testimony falls under Rule 68 of the Rome Statute, which set up the ICC.

    But William Ruto’s defence team argued this was unfair because changes to the rule were brought in after the case against him and his fellow defendant, the journalist Joshua arap Sang, had started.

    Presiding Judge Piotr Hofmanski ruled that prior-recorded testimony was delivered without an opportunity for the accused to cross-examine the witnesses.

    Mr Sang, who is accused of using his radio show to organise attacks in the election aftermath, said at the time that the decision was “one step to our freedom”.

    Mr Ruto and Mr Kenyatta were on opposite sides of the 2007 election, but formed an alliance that won the 2013 election.

    William Ruto denies charges of crimes against humanity