Category: Politics

  • Besigye returns, supporters take charge of his home security

    {Unlike his last return when police deployed heavily along Entebbe road and picked Besigye, a four time challenger of President Yoweri Museveni from the plane before driving him to his home in Kasangati, Wakiso District, today’s return had no major incidents.}

    Former presidential candidate Dr Kizza Besigye has returned from his 12-days trip abroad.

    Besigye on October 17 flew out of the country saying he was taking a break from harassment state institutions.

    This was after police blocked him from attending court as part of his bail conditions in a case in which he was charged with treason.

    Unlike his last return when police deployed heavily along Entebbe road and picked Besigye, a four time challenger of President Yoweri Museveni from the plane before driving him to his home in Kasangati, Wakiso District, today’s return had no major incidents.

    Besigye was reportedly first blocked by police on Entebbe road for unknown reasons before being let to proceed.

    At Besigye’s home in Kasangati, his supporters have reportedly taken over security warning police to stay out of bounds.

    Some were seen holding with placards with inscriptions “No fly zone for police.”

    Dr Besigye is said to have used his latest tour of Europe and the United States, to highlight what he says is the deteriorating human rights situation in Uganda, we have been told.

    Two days after he left the country, Dr Besigye on October 19, attended a ceremony at the University of Manchester where his wife, Winnie Byanyima, was honoured with a doctorate for her role in advocating for women’s rights.

    A day later, Besigye proceeded to Washignton DC, in the United States of America where he had reportedly gone to press for tougher action against Museveni’s government.

    Dr Kizza Besigye waves to his supporters at Mpererwe on his way from Entebbe Airport to his home in Kasangati .
  • Michelle Obama for president?

    {First lady takes on increasingly political role, raising suspicion – and hope – that she might one day run for office.}

    In a North Carolina coliseum, five young women are beaming after hearing US First Lady Michelle Obama speak. The event at Wake Forest University was a political rally for a former first lady, Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. But the main attraction was, without a doubt, the current first lady.

    The US election season isn’t over yet but these women are ready for the next one.

    “It would be really incredible if Michelle Obama eventually ran for president,” says Yasi Emamian, 21, enthusiastically.

    “She’s just so inspiring, so strong and every single time I hear her speak, it makes me not be as frustrated with every other thing going on in this election,” says Elizabeth Lordi, 18.

    Obama made history by joining Clinton, for the first time, on stage on Thursday, a point she acknowledged.

    “I know that there are some folks out there who have commented that it’s been unprecedented for a sitting first lady to be so actively engaged in a presidential campaign,” she told the capacity audience. “And that may be true, but what’s also true is that this is truly an unprecedented election. And that’s why I’m out here.”

    Not only is the first woman nominee of a major political party running for president, but both first ladies are united by an opponent whose remarks about sexually assaulting women has forced people like Obama to wade into much more political terrain.

    In a 2005 taping for a US entertainment magazine programme, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump is overheard bragging about forcing himself on women without their consent. “Just kiss. Don’t even wait,” he boasts. “You can do anything. Grab them by the pussy.”

    That tape was released just two days before the second presidential debate.

    Within a week, multiple women came forward alleging Trump did exactly what he spoke about.

    Michelle Obama had heard enough. In an October 13 speech in New Hampshire, the mother of two daughters who’d spent her entire time at the White House promoting initiatives for young women and girls around the world, went after Trump.

    “I have to tell you that I can’t stop thinking about this,” Obama told the crowd. “It has shaken me to my core in a way that I couldn’t have predicted.” She went on to attack the Republican nominee without naming him, adding, “Now is the time for all of us to stand up and say enough is enough. This has got to stop right now.”

    It was a defining moment in the campaign. Obama had already wowed the Democratic National Convention in July with a powerful speech which included a phrase that’s become a signature rallying cry for Clinton at campaign stops: “When they go low, we go high!” But her New Hampshire remarks raised expectations that she was preparing to follow in Clinton’s footsteps.

    It’s doubtful it will ever happen, argues Chris Galdieri, assistant professor of politics at St Anselm College. “I don’t think she has that same motivation [as Clinton].” He notes that President Barack Obama has repeatedly made a point of telling the media his wife is eager to leave the White House.

    In a January interview with CBS News, when asked whether he’d ever consider staying if a third term were permitted under the US Constitution, Obama answered he’d decline. “Number one, Michelle wouldn’t let me,” he said.

    But Bill Schneider, professor of public policy at George Mason University, thinks it’s entirely possible Obama will seek political office. “I can tell you she is taken seriously by an awful lot of Democrats,” he notes. The key, he adds, is finding a state where she can run for either the US Senate or a governorship. “She could probably be elected a senator from California without any trouble.”

    That’s the path Clinton took. After leaving the White House in 2001, she ran successfully for the US Senate that same year. She served for eight years before becoming Obama’s secretary of state and then the Democratic presidential nominee.

    Even if Michelle Obama shuns the politician’s life for herself, her fans believe she’s already a tour de force.

    “I know she’s going to be an influential person, regardless,” says Wallis Herzog, 18. “I’m in awe of her always.”

    Obama made history by joining Clinton, for the first time, on stage on Thursday
  • Burundi: ICC Withdrawal Major Loss to Victims

    {Burundi has taken a major step backward by officially withdrawing from theInternational Criminal Court, Human Rights Watch said today. Other African ICC members should distance themselves from Burundi’s withdrawal and affirm their support for justice for victims of the gravest crimes.}

    On October 18, 2016, President Pierre Nkurunziza signed legislation calling for Burundi’s withdrawal from the ICC. Burundi’s government claimed the court is an instrument of powerful countries used to punish leaders who do not comply with the West.

    “Burundi has failed to hold people responsible for brutal crimes to account and has sunk to a new low by attempting to deny victims justice before the ICC,” said Daniel Bekele, Africa director at Human Rights Watch. “This latest move only confirms Burundi’s continuing disregard for human rights and the rule of law.”

    The decision to withdraw came after the United Nations Human Rights Council resolved, on September 30, to create a commission of inquiry into human rights abuses in Burundi since April 2015 that would identify alleged perpetrators and recommend steps to guarantee that they are held accountable.

    Burundi submitted notification of its withdrawal to the UN secretary-general, as required under the ICC’s Rome Statute for formal withdrawal. Burundi’s withdrawal comes after South Africa announced on October 21 that it had notified the UN secretary-general that it was withdrawing from the ICC. Gambia announced on October 24 that it also intends to withdraw.

    South Africa’s announcement was met with a call from activists based across Africa for African governments to continue to support the ICC as a crucial court of last resort. Senegalese Justice Minister Sidi Kaba, who is the president of the ICC’s Assembly of States Parties, called for South Africa and Burundi to reconsider their decision. Civil society groups and an opposition party in South Africa also have challenged the withdrawal in the country’s courts, arguing that it failed to comply with South African law.

    The ICC is meant to act as a court of last resort, stepping in only when national courts cannot or will not prosecute the most serious international crimes. Hundreds of people have been viciously tortured, killed, raped, ordisappeared in Burundi since 2015. But the Burundian justice system, deeply corrupt and manipulated by ruling party officials, almost never conducts credible investigations or brings those responsible for these crimes to justice. Hundreds of arbitrarily arrested people have been detained on trumped-up charges.

    Under the ICC’s Rome Statute, withdrawal does not come into effect until one year after the state has formally announced it to the UN secretary-general. Earlier this year, ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda opened a preliminary examination into possible crimes against humanity in Burundi since April 2015.

    Since 2009, the ICC has faced a backlash from a vocal minority of African leaders focused on claims that the court is unfairly targeting Africa. While all of the ICC’s investigations to date, with the exception of Georgia, have been in Africa, the majority have been initiated at the request of an African government.

    However, the ICC works in a global landscape where the disparity of political, economic, and military power is stark. A number of the most powerful countries, including three permanent members of the UN Security Council – Russia, China, and the United States – and their allies have not joined the court and have thus been able to avoid ICC scrutiny. The permanent members of the UN Security Council have used their veto privilege to block referral to the ICC of situations desperately in need of justice in countries that are not ICC members, including Syria.

    Although they have too often been silent in the face of attacks on the ICC, many African governments have continued to quietly support the court, cooperating with investigations and referring new situations to the court.

    In July, several African ICC members – Côte d’Ivoire, Nigeria, Senegal, and Tunisia – took an important step in joining Botswana, a vocal ICC supporter, to expressly oppose an AU call at its summit meeting for ICC withdrawal. Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Senegal also entered reservations to the July summit decision.

    Activists across Africa have, since 2009, joined with international groups to call for African governments to support and strengthen the ICC instead of undermining it, most recently in response to South Africa’s stated intention towithdraw.

    “The ICC remains the only path to justice for many victims of the gravest crimes when national courts are unable or unwilling to try these cases,” Bekele said. “African countries should distance themselves from ICC withdrawal, and reaffirm their commitment to accountability for atrocities in Africa.”

  • Republicans in Jerusalem rally for Donald Trump

    {US presidential hopeful addresses Israeli-American supporters in a video message, pledging to make Israel “safe again”.}

    Jerusalem – “Make America Great Again” hats and blue Trump-Pence shirts were easily spotted. American flags waved in the wind. Chants of “Lock her up” echoed outside, a mainstay of Donald Trump’s speeches aimed at his rival Hillary Clinton.

    But the Jewish head coverings, Hebrew conversations and Israeli flags gave this rally in support of the Republican presidential candidate a decidedly different flavour than the ones held in the US.

    About 250 people gathered on Wednesday for a pro-Trump pep rally that overlooked the historic Old City walls, a symbolic location underlining the event speakers’ main message: Jerusalem is Israel’s eternal capital, and a President Trump would depart from long-held US policy and recognise that fact.

    Speakers repeatedly denounced the recent UNESCO vote to condemn Israeli measures that hinder Muslim access to the al-Aqsa compound. Israelis were particularly incensed that the resolution did not explicitly note the Jewish connection to the site, known to Jews as the Temple Mount.

    The Trump rally, which featured Christian evangelicals, Israeli-American settlers and Trump staffers, was the biggest show of force yet for the pro-Trump campaign in Israel, which is hoping to turn out the Israeli-American vote for the Republican ticket.

    Republicans Overseas Israel, the group leading pro-Trump efforts in Israel, has set up outreach offices across Israel and in settlements in the occupied West Bank – a first for a presidential campaign – to drum up support for Trump and Mike Pence, his pick for vice president.

    Recent polls, however, suggest that Democrat candidate Hillary Clinton commands the most support among Israelis, though there are no polls of only Israeli-Americans.

    While Trump’s earlier statements on Israel raised eyebrows among the pro-Israel community – including a vow to remain “neutral” in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and a refusal to say whether he would recognise Jerusalem as Israel’s capital – the presidential hopeful has changed his tune.

    He has since attracted the support of pro-Israel donors like casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, who has given $10m to a pro-Trump Super-PAC that is spending money on anti-Clinton television advertisements.

    Trump’s statements are now in line with the Republican base on Israel, a change of direction evident in his pre-recorded video statement to the rally.

    “My administration will stand side by side with the Jewish people and Israel’s leaders to continue strengthening the bridges that connect not only Jewish Americans and Israelis, but also all Americans and Israelis,” Trump told the crowd, which frequently burst out into “Trump, Trump, Trump!” chants.

    “Together, we will stand up to the enemies like Iran, bent on destroying Israel and her people. Together, we will make America and Israel safe again.”

    Marc Zell, the chairman of Republicans Overseas Israel and an Israeli-American settler, told Al Jazeera that “it’s important that the world here, and the voters both here in Israel and the United States, hear the strong support that the Republican Party and the candidates have for Jerusalem”.

    Republicans Overseas Israel does not have an official relationship with the Trump campaign, but the group does coordinate its messaging with the Republican candidate’s campaign in the US. The group is funded by private donors.

    Zell said the video messages from Trump and Pence on Israel at the rally could appeal to Christian evangelicals and pro-Israel Jews in the United States.

    The evangelical community, which is strongly supportive of Israel and usually reliable Republican voters, is split over Trump’s candidacy, particularly in light of his remarks bragging about groping and kissing women without their consent.

    Zell added that the Israeli-American vote could be particularly important in swing states like Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania. “If those states come close the votes from here can be highly significant,” he said.

    The group iVoteIsrael, a non-partisan organisation that registers American Israelis to vote, estimates there are 200,000 eligible American voters who live in Israel.

    That includes 60,000 Americans who live in West Bank settlements, according to Sara Yael Hirschorn, a lecturer in Israel Studies at the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom.

    Hirschorn doubts Israeli Americans will have a substantive impact on the outcome of the presidential election. But she said Republican efforts in Israel have symbolic value, and that most West Bank Israeli-American settlers will likely vote for Trump.

    Unlike most American Jews, many West Bank settlers vote based on a candidate’s stance on Israel, she said.

    “[Israeli-American settlers] can demonstrate that they’re able to collectively mobilise and that they want to have an influence on American politics,” Hirschorn told Al Jazeera. “They want to ensure that the next American president is going to be favourable to Israel continuing to hold on to the West Bank and expand the settlement enterprise.”

    Trump appeals to rally attendees like Yossi Kransdorf, a 28-year-old Israeli-American who lives in a West Bank settlement and plans to vote. He said he was particularly appreciative of the fact that Republican Overseas Israel has offices in the occupied territories.

    “He’s better for Israel,” he said. “[Clinton] doesn’t recognise Jerusalem as the capital. That’s the ABCs [of supporting Israel].”

    Israel captured the Arab eastern half of Jerusalem during the 1967 Arab-Israeli war and annexed it in 1980. The US, and most other UN member states, do not recognise the annexation and consider Jerusalem’s final status to be a key issue to be resolved in peace negotiations with the Palestinians.

    David Friedman, Trump’s adviser on Israel who could be the next US ambassador to Israel if Trump wins, underscored his message on Jerusalem by vowing that a Trump administration would move the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.

    That is a move strongly supported by many members of Congress, but US presidents have been loath to do so for fear that giving American blessing to Israeli control and occupation of Jerusalem would inflame a volatile situation.

    Friedman also added a Trumpian flavour to the rally by indulging in conspiracy theories. He claimed that Huma Abedin, a top Clinton aide, has “close connections to the Muslim Brotherhood” – and after an audience member shouted out that she is tied to al-Qaeda, repeated that claim on stage. Right-wing Americans have long pushed the theory that Abedin, a Muslim, has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, but she does not, according to fact checkers.

    But the crowd loved the claims- and Friedman urged the “well-educated crowd”, as he put it, to “give yourselves a round of applause, because you guys really know what you’re talking about.”

    About 250 people gathered for the event near Jerusalem's Old City walls
  • EU-AU PSC called on Burundi for genuine dialogue

    {The African Union Peace and Security Council-AU PSC and the European Union Peace and Security Council- EU PSC expressed hope that the report of former President Mkapa, to the recent EAC Summit, and the response of Heads of State, can accelerate the process. They commended the mediation efforts deployed by President Yoweri Museveni of Uganda, the EAC Mediator and former President Benjamin Mkapa of Tanzania, EAC Facilitator in the Inter-Burundian Dialogue.}

    This resulted from a communiqué issued on 25 October after their 9th Annual Joint Consultative Meeting held in Brussels, Belgium, as part of their regular dialogue within the framework of the Africa – EU partnership. The Joint Consultative Meeting was preceded by an informal joint retreat of the AU PSC and the EU PSC, held on 24 October 2016, which provided a platform for an informal exchange on countering terrorism, radicalization and violent extremism as well as on migration.

    The EU and AU PSC noted that the AU PSC assessment during its visit to the country in June 2016 was that the security situation had improved in the country. However, the AU PSC and the EU PSC expressed their continued preoccupation with the security situation in the country and encouraged efforts to continue improving it. “The East African Community (EAC) facilitation needs to succeed on the understanding that only an inclusive dialogue can bring a viable solution” said the joint communiqué. The AU PSC and EU PSC called on the government and opposition to engage genuinely in the Dialogue.

    Finally, they agreed on the need for the full deployment of AU observers in the field, both civilian and military.

  • Gambia to withdraw from International Criminal Court

    {Gambia has announced its withdrawal from the International Criminal Court, accusing the Hague-based tribunal of the “persecution and humiliation of people of colour, especially Africans”.}

    The announcement late Tuesday comes after similar decisions this month by South Africa and Burundi to abandon the troubled institution, set up to try the world’s worst crimes.

    Information Minister Sheriff Bojang said in an announcement on state television that the court had been used “for the persecution of Africans and especially their leaders” while ignoring crimes committed by the West.

    He singled out the case of former British prime minister Tony Blair, who the ICC decided not to indict over the Iraq war.

    “There are many Western countries, at least 30, that have committed heinous war crimes against independent sovereign states and their citizens since the creation of the ICC and not a single Western war criminal has been indicted.”

    The withdrawal, he said, “is warranted by the fact that the ICC, despite being called International Criminal Court, is in fact an International Caucasian Court for the persecution and humiliation of people of colour, especially Africans”.

    The ICC, set up in 2002, is often accused of bias against Africa and has also struggled with a lack of cooperation, including from the United States, which has signed the court’s treaty but never ratified it.

    Gambia has been trying without success to use the court to punish the European Union for deaths of thousands of African migrants trying to reach its shores.

    The decision will also come as a personal blow to the court’s chief prosecutor, Fatou Bensouda, a former Gambian justice minister.

    {{‘Chaos is coming’}}

    The court at the weekend asked South Africa and Burundi to reconsider their decisions to leave, which came as a major blow to the institution.

    “I urge them to work together with other States in the fight against impunity, which often causes massive violations of human rights,” Sidiki Kaba, president of the assembly of state parties to the ICC founding treaty, said in a statement.

    South Africa’s decision followed a dispute last year when Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir visited the country despite being the subject of an ICC arrest warrant over alleged war crimes.

    Earlier this month, Burundi said it would leave the court, while Namibia and Kenya have also raised the possibility.

    Kaba said he was concerned that South Africa and Burundi’s decisions would pave the way for other African states to leave the court.

    The tribunal is tasked with “prosecuting the most serious crimes that shock the conscience of humanity, namely genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and crimes of aggression”.

    The court’s former prosecutor Luis Moreno Ocampo criticised Burundi and South Africa, accusing them of giving leaders on the continent a free hand “to commit genocide”.

    “Burundi is leaving the ICC to keep committing crimes against humanity and possible genocide in its territory. Burundi’s president wants free hands to attack civilians.”

    He added that former South African president Nelson Mandela had “promoted the establishment of the Court to avoid new massive crimes in Africa. Now under the Zuma leadership South Africa decided to cover up the crimes and abandoned African victims. The world is going backward”.

    “The chaos is coming. Genocide in Burundi and a new African war are in motion,” he said.

    Congolese warlord Thomas Lubanga hears the first-ever sentence delivered by the International Criminal Court (ICC) in the Hague on July 10, 2012. Gambia has announced its withdrawal from the International Criminal Court, accusing the Hague-based tribunal of the "persecution and humiliation of people of colour, especially Africans".
  • Burundi withdraws permits from prominent rights group

    {Government accuses non-profit and non-governmental organisations of stirring up hatred and tarnishing nation’s image.}

    Burundi’s government has withdrawn permits from a prominent human rights organisation and several other non-profit groups, accusing them of stirring up hatred and tarnishing the nation’s image, an order issued by the interior ministry said.

    Non-profit and non-governmental organisations have often been accused of taking sides against the government in a political crisis that has rumbled on since last year over President Pierre Nkurunziza’s election for a third term.

    Among those whose permits were withdrawn was the Association for the Protection of Human Rights and Detained Persons (APRODH), run by prominent activist Pierre Claver Mbonimpa, who survived an assassination attempt by unidentified gunmen last year and then left for Europe where he remains.

    Mbonimpa and other activists have criticised the president for seeking a third term, accusing him of violating the constitution and a peace deal that ended civil war in 2005. They have accused the state and security forces of rights abuses.

    The government cites a ruling by the constitutional court saying the president could seek another term. It also dismisses allegations of abuses.

    “In spite of the multiple warnings the associations … have deviated from their objectives as written in the statute and keeps on tarnishing the country’s image and sowing hatred and divisions among the Burundian people,” according to the order signed by Interior Minister Pascal Barandagiye.

    The order was seen by the Reuters news agency on Monday. It said the order came into force on the date of signing, October 19.

    The other four organisations named were also involved in a range of rights and development issues. The groups and activists involved with them have previously been accused of siding with the opponents of the government.

    In a similar order, signed by the minister and also seen by Reuters on Monday, the activities of five organisations, including a journalists union, were suspended. The groups were accused of “disturbing public order and state security”.

    A political crisis broke out in Burundi last year over President Pierre Nkurunziza's election for a third term
  • Poles join ‘umbrella protest’ against abortion curbs

    {Street protests are expected to continue on Monday, when some women also planning a strike, boycotting jobs and classes.}

    Polish women have taken to the streets across the country, launching another round of protests against efforts by the nation’s conservative leaders to tighten already restrictive abortion law.

    A large group gathered on Sunday outside the parliament building in Warsaw, chanting “We have had enough!”

    The latest round of demonstrations, held under the slogan “We are not putting our umbrellas away,” was organised in response to a new proposal that would fall short of a total ban, but outlaw abortions in cases where fetuses are unviable or badly damaged.

    Polish media reported that similar protests were happening in cities and towns across the country.

    The street protests are expected to continue on Monday, when some women also planning a strike, boycotting jobs and classes.

    Similar protests took place earlier this month against a proposal for a total ban on abortion.

    But lawmakers rejected that proposal after massive crowds of women dressed in black staged streets protests under their umbrellas in the rain.

    Jaroslaw Kaczynski, the head of the ruling Law and Justice party, said recently he wants the law to ensure that women carry their fetuses to term even in cases of Down Syndrome, or when there is no chance of survival. The move would allow for baptisms and burials, Kacynski said.

    His socially conservative party won parliamentary and presidential elections last year with the support of Poland’s powerful Roman Catholic church, Catholic media outlets and religious voters.

    Many observers see the attempts to further restrict abortion as a way for the party to re-pay its debt to its religious base.

    However, the proposals have proven too restrictive for many Poles, including some who voted for the party.

    Abortion was legal and easily available under communism in Poland, but after communism’s fall the country re-embraced many of its Catholic traditions.

    The current law, passed in 1993, bans most abortions, with exceptions only made in cases of rape, if the mother’s life or health is at risk, or if the fetus is irreparably damaged.

    Official statistics show there were 1,040 legal abortions in Poland last year, although many more abortions are known to take place, with women or traveling to neighboring countries for the procedure or ordering abortion-inducing pills online.

    The current law, passed in 1993, bans most abortions, except in cases of rape
  • Venezuela opposition: Maduro’s government staged a coup

    {Opposition-controlled parliament says government breached constitution by blocking referendum to oust president.}

    President Nicolas Maduro’s government committed a coup d’etat by blocking a referendum on removing him from power, Venezuela’s opposition-majority parliament accused.

    Furious over the electoral authorities’ decision to suspend the process of organising a recall vote, opposition MPs on Sunday passed a resolution declaring “the breakdown of constitutional order” and “a coup d’etat committed by the Nicolas Maduro regime”.

    In an emergency session on the economic and political crisis gripping the South American oil giant, MPs called on Venezuelans to “actively defend” the constitution by protesting. They also promised to request the international community to “activate mechanisms” to restore democracy.

    “A continual coup d’etat has been perpetrated in Venezuela, culminating in the decision to rob us of a recall referendum. We’re here to officially declare the regrettable and painful rupture of the constitution,” said majority leader Julio Borges of the centre-right opposition coalition, the Democratic Unity Roundtable (MUD).

    Pro-Maduro politicians accused the opposition itself of seeking to stage a coup.

    “Don’t try to take advantage of these hard times to finish off our nation,” deputy Earle Herrera said.

    Opposition politicians stopped short of voting to put Maduro on trial, as they had earlier threatened.

    The session briefly descended into chaos when Maduro supporters forced their way past security guards and burst into the National Assembly, a moment which put proceedings on hold for 45 minutes.

    {{Largely symbolic}}

    Despite harsh rhetoric, the legislature’s resolution is largely symbolic.

    The Supreme Court has declared the legislative majority in contempt of court for defying it by swearing in three lawmakers at the centre of an electoral fraud investigation.

    The opposition, which says the accusations are trumped up, condemns the high court as a Maduro lapdog.

    The court has slapped down every bill passed by the legislature since the opposition took control in January.
    New low

    Venezuela’s crisis hit a new low on Thursday when the National Electoral Council indefinitely suspended the recall referendum process after criminal courts in five states ruled the opposition had committed fraud in an initial petition drive.

    Holding a recall referendum – a right guaranteed under Venezuela’s constitution – was the opposition’s main strategy to get rid of the man they accuse of driving the once-booming country to the brink of collapse.

    The opposition had been gearing up for the last hurdle in the complex process: a three-day drive starting on Wednesday to collect signatures from four million voters demanding a recall vote.

    Now that the authorities have stymied that bid, furious opposition leaders have promised the start of a new wave of nationwide protests on Wednesday.

  • South Africa: ANC chief whip urges Jacob Zuma to quit

    {The chief whip of South Africa’s governing political party has called on its entire leadership – including President Jacob Zuma – to step down.}

    Jackson Mthembu said fraud charges against the finance minister, Pravin Gordhan, were politically motivated.

    He said the current government was worse than the apartheid state.

    The ANC, which liberated South Africa from white minority rule in 1994, suffered its worst ever electoral performance in August.

    Mr Mthembu said he excluded no-one in the leadership from his call for resignations – not even himself.

    “President Jacob Zuma is the president of the ANC (African National Congress),” he told ENCA television.

    “When I said the entire ANC leadership that has already taken collective responsibility must take the fall, I meant everybody, myself included, including President Zuma.”

    Quizzed by local journalists on the comparison to the apartheid state, he said it had also used “state instruments” to suppress the people.

    However, he said even the apartheid regime “never pursued its own ministers”.

    “Perhaps we are not the leadership that can take the ANC forward under these conditions,” he said.

    Since taking office, Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan has attempted to distance himself from Mr Zuma’s business allies.

    However, he is now facing allegations of misconduct from when he was in charge of the tax collection service a decade ago.

    The fraud charges relate to alleged severance payments made to two senior executives at the South African Revenue Service (SARS).

    Mr Gordhan is also supported by the party’s deputy president, Cyril Ramaphosa.
    There have been growing rifts within the ANC in recent months.

    In the August elections, the party suffered its worst results since the election of Nelson Mandela in 1994, losing several key battlegrounds.

    Voters were seen as reacting to high unemployment and the scandalssurrounding President Jacob Zuma.

    "The entire ANC leadership ... must take the fall", Jackson Mthembu said.