Category: Politics

  • Who’s running against Suluhu? What to know about Tanzania’s 2025 presidential election

    Who’s running against Suluhu? What to know about Tanzania’s 2025 presidential election

    While 17 candidates have been cleared to contest the presidency, the race is widely seen as uncompetitive, with President Samia Suluhu Hassan facing only minor challengers following the disqualification of the country’s two largest opposition parties.

    President Samia Suluhu Hassan, who assumed power in 2021 following the death of John Magufuli, is running with Emmanuel Nchimbi, a seasoned politician and former minister.

    Since the reintroduction of multi-party democracy in 1992, CCM has never lost a general election, and Samia Suluhu is highly likely to extend her party’s unbroken run of power, which began with its predecessor in 1961, to over six decades in the upcoming 2025 general election.

    {{Main opposition leaders barred
    }}

    The election landscape changed dramatically after the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) barred the two largest opposition parties, Chadema and ACT-Wazalendo, from participating.

    Tundu Lissu, leader of Chadema, was arrested in April on treason charges after what he termed a campaign for electoral reforms. His party was subsequently disqualified from the election.

    Similarly, Luhaga Mpina, the presidential hopeful from ACT-Wazalendo, was disqualified twice. Although the High Court initially reinstated his candidacy, the electoral commission quickly reversed the decision following an objection from the Attorney General, and the High Court later upheld the final disqualification.

    These developments have left smaller opposition parties in the running, though none are seen as posing a serious threat to CCM’s dominance.

    With the main opposition out of the race, the remaining contenders include the incumbent, Samia Suluhu Hassan, along with 16 candidates from smaller parties.

    Salum Mwalimu of the Public Liberation Party (Chaumma) is arguably the most politically significant figure among the minor opposition, largely due to his recent high-profile role in the main opposition movement.

    Chaumma presidential candidate Salum Mwalimu Juma campaigns during a recent rally.

    Mwalimu previously served as the running mate to Tundu Lissu, the disqualified Chadema leader, in the 2020 presidential election, and was a former Secretary-General of that party before his defection to Chaumma. His participation is notable as he attempts to capitalise on the void left by his former party.

    Haji Ambar Khamis (National Convention for Construction and Reform – Mageuzi – NCCR-MAGEUZI), representing a veteran opposition party, has put forth a core campaign pledge focused on major political change, promising to enact a new national constitution within his first 100 days if elected.

    Haji Ambar Khamis has put forth a core campaign pledge focused on major political change.

    Gombo Samandito Gombo of the People’s United Front (CUF) represents one of Tanzania’s oldest opposition parties, with historical strength, particularly in Zanzibar. His campaign focuses on combating corruption, promoting fiscal independence through domestic revenue mobilisation, and pledging major investments in agriculture and free social services.

    Saum Hussein Rashid of the United Democratic Party (UDP) and Mwajuma Noty Mirambo of the Union for Multiparty Democracy (UMD) are notable as two of the few female presidential candidates in the 2025 contest, highlighting the limited but significant representation of women in Tanzania’s political landscape.

    Majalio Paul Kyara of the Sauti ya Umma Party (SAU) carries forward his party’s tradition of contesting presidential elections, with SAU having fielded candidates in every general election since 2005.

    Majalio Paul Kyara is running on Sauti ya Umma Party (SAU).

    Hassan Kisabya Almas of the National Reconstruction Alliance (NRA), Coster Jimmy Kibonde of the Makini Party (MAKINI), Abdul Juma Mluya of the Democratic Party (DP), and Kunje Ngombale Mwiru of the Alliance for African Farmers Party (AAFP) are among the smaller party candidates seeking to offer alternative platforms, though none are seen as major contenders.

    Georges Gabriel Bussungu of the Tanzania Democratic Alliance (ADA-TADEA), Twalib Ibrahim Kadege of the United People’s Democratic Party (UPDP), Doyo Hassan Doyo of the National League for Democracy (NLD), and Wilson Elias Mulumbe of the Alliance for Democratic Change (ADC) also bring their parties’ distinct agendas to the race, representing minor opposition voices.

    David Daud Mwaijojele of the Social Democratic Party (CCK) and Yustas Mbatina Rwamugira of the Tanzania Labour Party (TLP) round out the field, adding further diversity to the slate of candidates despite their limited political reach.

    If re-elected, President Suluhu is expected to consolidate her leadership within CCM and continue her agenda focused on economic reform, gender inclusion, and international cooperation.

    Tanzania's President Samia Suluhu Hassan delivers her remarks during the launch of the party's campaign for the upcoming general elections, at Tanganyika Packers grounds in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, Thursday, Aug. 28, 2025.
  • Ndayishimiye accused of deploying 400 Imbonerakure to reinforce FLN militia

    Ndayishimiye accused of deploying 400 Imbonerakure to reinforce FLN militia

    The Imbonerakure, the youth wing of Burundi’s ruling CNDD-FDD party, were trained at the Makamba military camp. They originate from regions including Kabarore, Bukinanyana, Mabayi, Mugina, and Rugombo, formerly part of Cibitoke Province in northwestern Burundi.

    The FLN operates mainly in South Kivu Province in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and the Kibira Forest in Burundi. Both groups are said to collaborate in operations targeting the Rwandan government, particularly in Minembwe and other parts of Fizi Territory.

    Between 2018 and 2019, the FLN launched a series of attacks in southwestern Rwanda, killing and injuring civilians and destroying property, including vehicles. These assaults were reportedly launched from bases in the Kibira Forest, where the group had been hosted by Burundian authorities.

    According to credible reports, FLN fighters operating in the Kidote area of Lemera Group, Uvira Territory, recently received over 200 Imbonerakure members under the command of Colonel Fabien Mukeshimana, also known as Kamayi. Another 200 recruits were reportedly dispatched to Lubarika in Uvira, where they joined FLN units led by Major General Dieudonné Hategekimana, alias Théophile.

    In mid-August 2025, Burundian military intelligence officials are said to have met Major General Hategekimana, urging him to collaborate with them and the DRC Armed Forces (FARDC) in Uvira and other areas bordering Rwanda. Sources indicate that the FLN commander was assured the cooperation would lead to financial and logistical support from the DRC government.

    A senior Burundian intelligence officer alleged that both President Ndayishimiye and his predecessor Pierre Nkurunziza had long supported the FDLR and FLN, citing ideological alignment rooted in ethnic animosity.

    “Ndayishimiye and Nkurunziza supported FDLR and FLN because they shared the ideology of hating the Tutsi,” the officer said. “The ruling CNDD-FDD party still promotes this tribalist agenda and believes supporting these groups can destabilise Rwanda’s FPR-led government.”

    Burundian photojournalist Teddy Mazina echoed similar sentiments during an August 2025 interview on The Long Form, asserting that the CNDD-FDD and the FDLR share a long-standing anti-Tutsi ideology, which underpins their cooperation.

    Mazina said that under Ndayishimiye’s administration, the Burundian government has allowed FDLR elements to operate freely — providing them with resources and enabling them to trade, settle, and organise within the country. He further recalled that during the May 2015 coup attempt against Nkurunziza, FDLR fighters from the DRC reportedly intervened to defend his government.

    “We have FDLR in Bujumbura,” Mazina said. “There is testimony that they came to defend Nkurunziza’s government when the coup failed. Cooperation has never stopped. In Bujumbura, there are Rwandans identifying as FDLR civilians who have lived in Burundi since 2010, owning many shops. The money they make from Congo flows into Burundi.”

    Reports further indicate that around 20,000 Burundian troops are currently stationed in South Kivu Province, particularly in Uvira Territory, maintaining active coordination with the FDLR and facilitating the movement of leaders from both groups between Bujumbura and other locations.

    The Imbonerakure, the youth wing of Burundi’s ruling CNDD-FDD party, were trained at the Makamba military camp.
  • Raila Odinga: The life and times of Kenya’s veteran politician

    Raila Odinga: The life and times of Kenya’s veteran politician

    Born on January 7, 1945, in Maseno, Nyanza Province, Raila Odinga was the son of Jaramogi Oginga Odinga, Kenya’s first Vice President and a key figure in the country’s independence movement. His father’s legacy shaped Raila’s political consciousness from an early age.

    Odinga pursued technical studies in East Germany in the 1960s, training as a mechanical engineer before returning to Kenya to teach and later work at the Kenya Bureau of Standards. His professional career soon gave way to political activism, as he became increasingly involved in the struggle for democracy during the one-party era.

    Odinga was arrested and charged with treason after being accused of being among the masterminds of the 1982 coup attempt to overthrow the government of then-President Daniel Arap Moi.

    He was released six years later in February 1988, but detained again in August that year to be released in June 1989.

    In the 1990s, Odinga was elected Member of Parliament for Lang’ata and emerged as one of the most vocal proponents of multi-party democracy. His persistence positioned him at the heart of Kenya’s pro-reform movement, earning both admiration and criticism for his defiance of entrenched political power.

    Odinga’s first presidential bid came in 1997, marking the beginning of a long series of campaigns for the country’s highest office. His 2007 election battle against then-President Mwai Kibaki was one of Kenya’s most contested polls, sparking post-election violence that claimed more than 1,200 lives. The crisis was resolved through a power-sharing deal that made Odinga Prime Minister under a coalition government from 2008 to 2013.

    During his tenure, Odinga played a crucial role in the formulation and adoption of Kenya’s 2010 Constitution, a landmark reform that devolved power and strengthened democratic institutions. Despite further presidential bids in 2013, 2017, and 2022, he never attained the presidency but remained an enduring symbol of opposition and reform.

    From 2018 to 2023, Odinga served as the African Union High Representative for Infrastructure Development in Africa, further cementing his influence on the continental stage.

    In 2022, he contested the presidency against William Ruto and challenged the results in court. The outcome was upheld, sparking protests from the opposition.

    At the height of Gen Z economic-related protests in 2024, Odinga joined forces with President Ruto to form a broad-based government, resulting in several of his allies being appointed to key positions. In response to growing criticism, he later explained that his decision was motivated by the need to quell potential political instability.

    He also campaigned for the African Union Commission Chairperson position in 2024–2025 but lost to Mahamoud Ali Youssouf of Djibouti.

    Raila Odinga is survived by his wife, Ida Odinga, and their children: Rosemary, Raila Jr., and Winnie. His eldest son, Fidel Odinga, passed away in 2015.

    Raila Odinga’s passing marks the end of an era in Kenyan politics, that of a resilient statesman whose quest for democracy, social justice, and good governance reshaped his country’s political landscape.

    Veteran Kenyan politician and former Prime Minister Raila Amolo Odinga died on Wednesday, October 15, 2025, in India at the age of 80.
  • Stephanie Nyombayire pokes holes in Tshisekedi’s peace narrative, exposes contradictions and militia support

    Stephanie Nyombayire pokes holes in Tshisekedi’s peace narrative, exposes contradictions and militia support

    At the forum, Tshisekedi accused Rwanda of supporting the M23 rebel group, a claim Kigali has repeatedly denied. He called on Rwanda to halt the escalation of violence in eastern DRC and extended a public hand to President Paul Kagame, urging cooperation to resolve the crisis.

    Tshisekedi insisted that the DRC had never been belligerent towards its neighbours, despite multiple reports of threats to invade Rwanda, bombard Kigali, and overthrow its leadership.

    In a hard-hitting post on social media, Nyombayire highlighted contradictions in Tshisekedi’s narrative. She criticised him for presenting himself as a peace-loving leader while repeatedly threatening Rwanda and claiming victimhood in a conflict he has failed to resolve.

    She outlined what she described as the true nature of Tshisekedi’s so-called “arm of peace.” Nyombayire alleged that he had armed and supported the FDLR, a genocidal militia formed by perpetrators of the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi, and integrated them into the national army.

    She further accused him of backing militias that persecute and kill civilians based on ethnicity. According to Nyombayire, he also denied the Congolese identity of the M23 to avoid responsibility for resolving the crisis.

    Nyombayire added that Tshisekedi sought international assistance while simultaneously undermining signs of progress. She noted that he hired mercenaries to fight his wars, yet still failed to achieve results. Finally, she said he scapegoated Rwanda for the DRC’s failures while leaders enriched themselves at the expense of ordinary citizens.

    President Kagame also appeared to dismiss Tshisekedi’s claims, calling them “noise of an empty drum” and urging the international community to ignore them.

    “If one makes an issue of noise of an empty drum, they also have a problem! Better to let it pass or walk away from it!!!” President Kagame wrote on X the following remarks by the DRC president.

    Citing President Kagame, Nyombayire wrote: “There is no use arguing with those who have repeated their lies long enough; they have come to believe them. There are no lessons Rwanda needs to be taught about the meaning of peace; those of us who have fought for peace know its price.”

    The exchanges come amid ongoing tensions between Rwanda and the DRC over the M23 rebel group, which says it represents marginalised Congolese Tutsi and Banyamulenge communities. Rwanda continues to deny supporting the group, pointing instead to the DRC’s security lapses and involvement with armed militias, including the FDLR.

    Despite multiple mediation efforts, including a peace deal signed in Washington and dialogue facilitated by Qatar, Rwanda has criticised the DRC for obstructing agreements and lacking the political will to ensure lasting peace.

    Rwanda’s Presidential Press Secretary, Stephanie Nyombayire, accused DRC President Félix Tshisekedi of presenting himself as a peace-loving leader while repeatedly threatening Rwanda and claiming victimhood in a conflict he has failed to resolve.
    Nyombayire accused the DRC leader of backing militias that persecute and kill civilians based on ethnicity.
  • ‘Noise of an empty drum’: President Kagame reacts after Tshisekedi’s claims on Rwanda

    ‘Noise of an empty drum’: President Kagame reacts after Tshisekedi’s claims on Rwanda

    “If one makes an issue of noise of an empty drum, they also have a problem! Better to let it pass or walk away from it!!!” President Kagame wrote on X following remarks by DRC President Félix Tshisekedi at the Global Gateway Forum 2025 in Brussels on Thursday, October 9, 2025.

    At the forum, which was also attended by President Kagame, Tshisekedi accused Rwanda of supporting the M23 rebel group, a claim Rwanda has repeatedly denied.

    He called on Rwanda to give the order for the M23 troops, which he claimed were backed by Rwanda, to halt the escalation in eastern DRC.

    Tshisekedi, while calling for peace in the eastern DRC, also claimed that his country has never been belligerent towards its neighbours, despite his repeated threats to invade Rwanda, bombard Kigali, and overthrow Rwanda’s leadership, threats that can be validated through multiple pieces of evidence.

    Meanwhile, Rwanda’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Olivier Nduhungirehe, also swiftly responded to Tshisekedi’s claims, describing them as false and misleading.

    “No, you are wrong on all counts. The only person who can stop this escalation is President Tshisekedi, and HE ALONE,” Nduhungirehe said, adding that Tshisekedi himself must cease his belligerent attitude, halt threats against Rwanda, and stop supporting armed militias, including the FDLR genocidaires and Wazalendo groups.

    The Minister further condemned the DRC president for deploying foreign mercenaries and using international platforms for political manoeuvring, describing Tshisekedi’s statements at the Forum as a “ridiculous political farce.”

    Diplomatic relations between Rwanda and the DRC have been tense since the resurgence of the M23 rebel group in 2021, which identifies as representing marginalised Congolese Tutsi and Banyamulenge communities.

    Kigali has repeatedly denied allegations of supporting the M23, instead pointing to the DRC’s own security lapses and its involvement with armed militias, including the FDLR, a group formed by perpetrators of the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi.

    Despite multiple mediation efforts, including a peace deal in Washington and dialogue facilitated by Qatar, Rwanda has criticised the DRC for obstructing agreements and lacking the political will to ensure lasting peace in the region.

    This includes the recent last-minute refusal to sign the Regional Economic Integration Framework, an agreement expected to mark a major step forward in bilateral and regional cooperation following months of U.S.-mediated negotiations.

    President Kagame delivers remarks at the Global Gateway Forum 2025 in Brussels on Thursday, October 9, 2025. The forum was also attended by his DRC counterpart Felix Tshisekedi.
  • CP Hatari assures Rubavu traders of Rwanda’s robust security

    CP Hatari assures Rubavu traders of Rwanda’s robust security

    He encouraged them to invest in modern and larger buildings to transform the district’s image.

    CP Hatari made these remarks on Saturday, October 4, 2025, during the official opening of La Briella Hotel, which will complement existing hospitality facilities and increase the number of available accommodation rooms.

    “We want Rubavu to become the second among the country’s secondary cities. We have everything it takes. Our security is guaranteed. We have a market for our produce.

    “You have seen that during festive seasons or when big events take place, many visitors struggle to find places to stay and end up sleeping in cars, yet you have the means. Use this good ambition and build new structures. Play your part in renewing the city,” he urged.

    CP Hatari reminded business owners and investors that while expanding into other districts can be valuable, they should first prioritize building essential investments within their own communities.

    “Look at how Musanze has been modernized without having better opportunities than Rubavu. You should stand up and join efforts to build an exemplary nation. Security alone is not enough without economic activity and development,” he added.

    CP Hatari commended Rubavu’s private sector for the progress they continue to make in transforming the town.

    Rubavu District Mayor, Prosper Mulindwa, who attended the inauguration of La Briella Hotel, also reminded local entrepreneurs that their investments benefit not only themselves but the entire country.

    “Everything you do, you do it for the country, not just for yourselves. You build for the present and the future generations. This new hotel will contribute to taxes and revenue.
    The courage you showed to invest is rare because many people only keep ideas without bringing them to life,” he said.

    Mulindwa praised Antoine Habarurema, the investor behind the newly built hotel, highlighting his determination.

    “Many will learn from you. As the district leadership, we appreciate your contribution to renewing a town that has long needed modernization,” he stated.

    For his part, Antoine Habarurema, the hotel owner acknowledged that his achievement was made possible by Rwanda’s inclusive and fair governance.

    “If it weren’t for the country’s good leadership that doesn’t discriminate based on origin or region, I would not have been able to complete this project. I thank our national leadership for giving everyone equal opportunities to work and invest. Without this fair system, I would not be doing business here. This hotel is a fruit of good governance,” he said.

    Antoine Habarurema hailed the country for creating a conducive business environment.
    Commissioner of Police (CP) Emmanuel Hatari, the Regional Police Commander for the Western region, has reassured traders in Rubavu District, reminding them that the country’s borders are secure and overall security is strong.
  • Tshisekedi’s latest U-turn rekindles Kagame’s past remarks on his character

    Tshisekedi’s latest U-turn rekindles Kagame’s past remarks on his character

    Delegations from both countries had worked tirelessly, day and night. Everything was in order; all that remained was to put pen to paper. But on October 3, 2025, when the day finally arrived, everything changed.

    In an unexpected turn of events, President Félix Antoine Tshisekedi instructed his delegation not to sign the agreement with a precondition of “withdrawal of 90% of Rwandan troops.”

    Rwanda has repeatedly denied the Kinshasa administration’s claims of troops in the DRC, insisting that its defensive posture along the border is necessary due to the security threat posed by the DRC-backed FDLR militia, formed by the perpetrators of the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi.

    Meanwhile, Rwanda was stunned by President Tshisekedi’s U-turn. Throughout all the previous discussions, not once had the issue of troops been raised. What was meant to be a historic step towards peace and cooperation suddenly became a story for another day.

    Rwanda’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Olivier Nduhungirehe, said, “They [the delegations] were ready to initial the document the following morning, but President Tshisekedi instructed, at the last minute, his delegation NOT to sign, fearing the negative reaction of his internal public opinion.

    Ambassador Nduhungirehe added that the agreement was purely economic and did not touch on security matters.

    “Indeed, negotiations on the REIF are purely economic and don’t consider security matters, which are handled by the Joint Security Coordination Mechanism (JSCM),” the minister added.

    He explained that the DRC’s last-minute decision caused confusion after months of intense mediation efforts led by Massad Boulos and the U.S. Department of State, who had worked tirelessly to ensure both sides reached an understanding.

    Minister Nduhungirehe recalled that in September 2024, it was again Tshisekedi who prevented his Foreign Minister from signing an agreement on dismantling the FDLR militia group and lifting Rwanda’s defensive measures, even though the military representatives of both countries had already agreed on those terms.

    DRC President Félix Antoine Tshisekedi is said to have instructed his delegation at the last minute not to sign an economic cooperation agreement with Rwanda.

    {{President Kagame had foreseen it}}

    Those closely following Rwanda–DRC relations were quick to recall President Paul Kagame’s remarks during his interview with Mario Nawfal in March 2025 after witnessing Tshisekedi’s latest behaviour.

    President Kagame revealed that he had held several discussions with President Tshisekedi since the latter assumed office, but found it difficult to reach a lasting understanding with him, as Tshisekedi often went back on their agreements.

    “I have no problem speaking with President Tshisekedi, but making deals is the most difficult thing. You agree on something, but once he steps out of the room, it’s completely different—either forgotten, changed, or he’ll say we never said that,” President Kagame stated.

    When asked what he would tell President Tshisekedi if they were sitting together at that very moment, President Kagame responded: “I would tell him I wish he wasn’t president of that good country,” he responded when asked what he would tell the DRC Head of State if they met.

    “Next time I meet him, I will tell him that,” he added.

    Tshisekedi’s sudden reversal on the agreement has now left many questioning whether he genuinely intends to honour the commitments made under the Washington peace accord between Rwanda and the DRC.

    At a time when the world had placed its hopes on this deal as the dawn of a new era of cooperation, President Tshisekedi’s decision has once again cast a shadow of uncertainty over relations between the two nations.

    President Kagame has previously questioned President Tshisekedi’s character, describing him as unreliable for making agreements and then reneging on them.
  • Rwanda urges global accountability for hate speech fueling violence in eastern DRC

    Rwanda urges global accountability for hate speech fueling violence in eastern DRC

    Speaking at a high-level meeting on R2P held on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York on September 23, Rwanda’s Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation, Olivier Nduhungirehe, stressed that unchecked hate speech in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is laying dangerous ground for mass violence.

    “These exchanges are not merely academic, they are part of our collective responsibility to prevent genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity,” he said.

    Nduhungirehe’s intervention comes amid escalating threats against Tutsi communities in eastern DRC, where armed groups, including the FDLR—formed by remnants of the perpetrators of the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi—continue to operate with backing from Kinshasa. He said the current patterns of ethnic incitement bear troubling similarities to the build-up to the genocide in Rwanda.

    “Rwanda knows more than most the cost of inaction,” he warned. “Yet in the Great Lakes region today, we see once again the rise of hate speech, identity-based violence and a fast-spreading genocide ideology—warning signs we cannot afford to ignore.”

    The Rwandan minister underscored that while the R2P framework, adopted in 2005, tasked states with protecting their citizens and empowered the international community to intervene when they failed, implementation has fallen short.

    He criticised the selective application of the doctrine, saying that ignoring structural injustices and “buying into fabricated narratives that invert the roles of victims and perpetrators” undermines the UN’s moral authority.

    “Sovereignty must be understood as a responsibility, not a shield for inaction,” he said. “When states fail to protect their own populations, the legitimacy of international action should not be in question. Lives lost because of our hesitation in the name of sovereignty are lives betrayed by the very UN Charter we swore to uphold.”

    Nduhungirehe urged the UN to shift from statements to concrete preventive measures, calling for early warning systems to translate into early action and for clear accountability mechanisms against incitement.

    “Hate speech is not free speech when it lays the foundation for genocide,” he said, stressing that actors who fuel violence should face institutional consequences and lose international support.

    While acknowledging progress such as the creation of the UN Office on Genocide Prevention and early warning tools, he insisted that gaps remain, particularly in the consistency and timeliness of responses.

    “R2P will be judged not by the eloquence of our debate, but by whether it prevents the next mass atrocity. Rwanda, therefore, proposes concrete actions,” he said, adding that the doctrine must be rooted in the historical realities of the Great Lakes region, where land disputes, exclusion and historical injustice continue to drive conflict.

    Rwanda’s Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation, Olivier Nduhungirehe, stressed that unchecked hate speech in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is laying dangerous ground for mass violence.
  • Belgium’s Prévot admits sanctions on Rwanda cannot resolve DRC conflict

    Belgium’s Prévot admits sanctions on Rwanda cannot resolve DRC conflict

    At the beginning of 2025, the Belgian government spearheaded a campaign urging European Union member states and other wealthy nations to impose sanctions on Rwanda, accusing Kigali of supporting M23.

    Prévot, who also serves as Deputy Prime Minister, argued at the time that sanctions would pressure Rwanda to “withdraw its troops” from eastern Congo. In his view, such punitive measures, which also extended to some leaders of the AFC/M23, could end the decades-long conflict in the DRC once and for all.

    This stance led Rwanda in March 2025 to sever ties with Belgium, accusing the former colonial power of pitiful attempts to sustain its neocolonial delusions.

    However, in a recent interview with Jeune Afrique, Minister Prévot acknowledged that dialogue is the only path to resolving the conflict. This position echoes Rwanda’s consistent call for the Congolese government to engage in direct talks with M23 instead of shifting the blame.

    Asked why his government no longer views sanctions as a viable solution, Prévot explained that although they may exert pressure on targeted individuals or entities, sanctions are not a “miracle cure” for ending conflicts like the one in eastern Congo.

    “What seems important to us is to be able to respond to the humanitarian emergency, knowing that the diplomatic resolution of the conflict is now in the hands of Qatar and the
    United States,” he stated.

    The Belgian minister added that his country would not interfere with the peace initiative led by the United States and Qatar. He warned, however, that if fighting resumes in the DRC and more cities fall, Belgium could renew its call for punitive measures.

    “These are processes that we must support, not interfere with. Only if they were to fail or if military logic took over again, with, for example, new captures of cities, could the question of sanctions arise again,” he added.

  • Highlights of the Rwanda-DRC draft economic cooperation pact

    Highlights of the Rwanda-DRC draft economic cooperation pact

    The 17-page draft outlines measures for regulatory reforms, third-party oversight of mining operations, the creation of cross-border special economic zones, and safeguards to ensure that each country retains full sovereign control over its natural resources.

    Sources familiar with the matter told Reuters that the draft builds on principles agreed in August, covering cooperation in energy development, infrastructure, mineral exploitation, national parks, tourism, and public health. It also outlines implementation measures, coordination mechanisms, and annual high-level summits to monitor progress, alongside technical working groups and steering committees.

    Under the draft, Rwanda and the DRC would work with the United States and other international partners to develop regulations and reforms aimed at reducing risks for private investors, curbing illicit trade, and increasing transparency. The agreement calls for third-party inspections of mining sites and collaboration with the private sector to create cross-border special economic zones.

    In a framework agreed upon last month, both countries reaffirmed their “full, sovereign control” over the exploitation, processing, and export of natural resources while committing to ensure that mineral revenues do not fund armed groups. The draft also seeks to establish a world-class industrial mining sector and improve interoperability of mineral supply chains across borders.

    Although the draft is a cornerstone of the June peace deal brokered in Washington under U.S. President Donald Trump, its implementation faces major security hurdles. The peace accord stipulated the neutralisation of the FDLR militia group linked to the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi, followed by the lifting of Rwanda’s defensive measures.

    The plan to dismantle the FDLR and remove Rwandan security measures was initially given a 90-day timeframe. However, there is currently no certainty that it will begin soon, as the DRC government continues to delay.

    Rwanda’s Ambassador to the United Nations, Martin Ngoga, recently told the Security Council that the DRC government did not agree to launch the operational plan to dismantle the FDLR during a joint security-level meeting held in Ethiopia early August.

    Frequent setbacks in the Doha process, which mediates between Kinshasa and the M23 rebels, further complicate the situation.

    Meanwhile, the draft is currently under review by Rwanda, the DRC, and other stakeholders. Representatives of both countries are expected to meet in early October 2025 to finalise the agreement. Unless changes occur, the economic cooperation pact will be signed by the end of that month, marking the final component of the Washington-brokered peace deal.

    U.S. officials have indicated that the agreement is critical for linking peace and economic development in the region and for attracting billions of dollars in Western investment in cobalt, tantalum, copper, lithium, and gold.

    Sources familiar with the matter told Reuters that the draft builds on principles agreed in August, covering cooperation in energy development, infrastructure, mineral exploitation, national parks, tourism, and public health.