Category: News

  • President Kagame hosts IAEA boss, discusses Rwanda’s nuclear energy progress

    President Kagame hosts IAEA boss, discusses Rwanda’s nuclear energy progress

    Grossi is in Rwanda for the inaugural Nuclear Energy Innovation Summit for Africa (NEISA 2025), a major event underway in Kigali that brings together experts, policymakers, and stakeholders from over 30 countries to advance nuclear solutions for sustainable development.

    During the meeting, President Kagame and Grossi discussed the transformative potential of nuclear energy in driving economic growth across the continent and reviewed the significant strides Rwanda has made toward the deployment of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) and Micro Reactors. These technologies are part of Rwanda’s broader energy diversification plan, designed to boost electricity production while minimising environmental impact.

    Also on Tuesday, President Kagame met with Niger’s Prime Minister Ali Mahaman Lamine Zeine, who is attending NEISA 2025. Their discussions focused on strengthening bilateral cooperation and aligning on key continental priorities.

    Rwanda is positioning itself to be among the few African nations with a nuclear-powered electricity plant by 2030, according to the Rwanda Atomic Energy Board (RAEB). The country has been investing in nuclear energy for nearly seven years, including strategic partnerships with Russia, the United States, Germany, and Canada.

    In 2024, Rwanda signed a memorandum of understanding with Nano Nuclear Energy Inc., an American company, to deploy SMRs and microreactors. This followed a 2023 agreement with Dual Fluid Energy Inc., based in Germany and Canada, to test next-generation nuclear technologies on Rwandan soil.

    The reactors Rwanda is pursuing require relatively small land footprints, 15 to 50 hectares, and are designed for high output without posing significant risks to nearby populations. These projects are expected to create up to 250 jobs across key operational categories.

    RAEB CEO Dr. Fidel Ndahayo on Monday noted that Rwanda has already identified potential sites for the plant and is conducting detailed feasibility studies to evaluate environmental and safety factors.

    “We now have a clear vision of our energy needs and how nuclear can address them,” he said.

    Rwanda has also prioritised human capital development in this sector. Over 200 students and RAEB staff have been sent abroad for specialised training, with additional cohorts expected to follow in partnership with countries such as Hungary, China, and South Korea. Domestic academic institutions, including the University of Rwanda, are set to launch nuclear education programs to strengthen local expertise.

    At the summit’s opening on Monday, Rwandan Prime Minister Edouard Ngirente emphasised the urgency of scaling up nuclear solutions to meet Africa’s rising energy demand, particularly as the continent’s population is projected to surpass 3 billion within four decades.

    With over 600 million Africans lacking access to electricity, Ngirente said nuclear energy is important as a sustainable, low-carbon solution capable of ensuring energy security and supporting climate resilience across the continent.

    Minister of Infrastructure Dr. Jimmy Gasore highlighted that Rwanda expects its first SMR to be in place by 2026, with operational readiness by 2028. He stressed that smaller nuclear plants—producing up to 100 MW—are more practical for countries like Rwanda, both in terms of scale and safety.

    NEISA 2025, organised in collaboration with international bodies such as the IAEA, United Nations Economic Commission for Africa, World Nuclear Association, and Nuclear Energy Agency, aims to position nuclear power as a central pillar of Africa’s sustainable development and energy independence.

    With current national capacity at 406.4 MW, Rwanda’s adoption of nuclear energy is expected to significantly boost the country’s electricity generation, supporting industrialisation, innovation, and inclusive growth.

    Also on Tuesday, President Kagame met with Niger’s Prime Minister Ali Mahaman Lamine Zeine, who is attending NEISA 2025.
  • What you should know about Rwanda’s new non-lethal gun rules

    What you should know about Rwanda’s new non-lethal gun rules

    The Ministerial Instructions, which came into force on April 23, 2025, were issued by the Ministry of Interior and are rooted in a 2022 Prime Minister’s Order.

    Signed by Interior Minister Dr Vincent Biruta, the new rules aim to enhance public safety and ensure accountability in the handling of non-lethal guns and related accessories.

    {{What qualifies as a non-lethal gun?
    }}

    Under the new regulations, a non-lethal gun is defined as a weapon designed to incapacitate a target while minimising the risk of death, permanent injury, or collateral damage.

    This includes any portable barreled weapon capable of firing non-explosive projectiles, or which can be modified to do so. The regulations also apply to accessories such as cartridges, bullet components, propellant powder, and related materials.

    Permitted uses of non-lethal guns are strictly limited to the incapacitation of domestic or wild animals, exhibition, sports and games, and other authorised activities approved by the competent authority.

    {{A new permit system
    }}

    At the core of the new regulatory framework is a comprehensive permit system, with authority divided between the Minister of Interior and the Inspector General of Police. The Minister of Interior is tasked with issuing permits for activities such as the importation, exportation, transit, and trading of non-lethal guns and accessories.

    Meanwhile, the Inspector General of Police is responsible for permits related to possession, use, transfer, or borrowing of such items.

    Anyone seeking a permit must submit a written application to the appropriate authority, accompanied by a range of supporting documents. These include an application letter clearly stating the type of permit being sought, a copy of the applicant’s identity card or passport proving they are at least 21 years of age, and—if applicable—a local business registration certificate.

    Individual applicants are also required to present a medical certificate from an authorised doctor confirming balanced mental health.

    In addition, applicants must provide documentation outlining the type and quantity of non-lethal guns and accessories they intend to acquire, evidence of a secure storage facility verified by a competent authority, and a curriculum vitae of personnel trained in handling such weapons.

    If the application involves bringing non-lethal guns and accessories into Rwanda, a police clearance from the country of export and a usage or trading permit from the country of residence are also necessary. A tax clearance certificate is mandatory for all applicants.

    Authorities are required to process permit applications within 30 days from the date of receipt.

    Once issued, permits will specify key information such as the date and place of issuance, validity period, country of origin or destination, end-user, type and quantity of the non-lethal guns and accessories involved, their storage location, and, where applicable, the weapon’s serial number and factory details.

    {{Reporting, storage, and inspections
    }}

    Permit holders are subject to rigorous oversight. They are required to submit a monthly report to the competent authority detailing how the non-lethal guns and accessories were used.

    Any incident involving a non-lethal weapon must be reported immediately to the nearest police station. Furthermore, any imported, traded, or transferred items must be reported to the Rwanda National Police for record-keeping.

    The instructions also impose strict storage requirements. Non-lethal guns and accessories must be stored securely and separately, and only managed by personnel with adequate training.

    To ensure these standards are upheld, a joint inspection team comprising representatives from the Ministry of Interior and the Rwanda National Police will carry out inspections at least every six months, or as frequently as necessary.

    {{Suspension, revocation, and penalties
    }}

    The regulations lay out clear grounds for suspending or revoking permits. A permit may be suspended for up to six months if an applicant is found to have provided false or incomplete information, submitted forged documents, failed to comply with the instructions, or if national security concerns arise.

    In cases where a permit has been suspended twice, or when the competent authority deems it necessary for security reasons, a full revocation may be issued.

    In both cases, the Rwanda National Police is authorised to confiscate the non-lethal weapons and accessories in question. The affected permit holder will be notified in writing, with a clear explanation of the reasons for the suspension or revocation and the duration, where applicable.

    Six-month transition period

    Recognising that some individuals and entities already possess non-lethal firearms, the regulations include a six-month grace period for compliance. Anyone in possession of non-lethal guns or accessories prior to the signing of the new instructions must bring themselves into full compliance by October 23, 2025.

    Signed by Interior Minister Dr Vincent Biruta, the new rules aim to enhance public safety and ensure accountability in the handling of non-lethal guns and related accessories.
  • Lot-drawing ceremony is a traditional religious ritual and historical convention that must be upheld in reincarnation of Living Buddhas: signed article

    Lot-drawing ceremony is a traditional religious ritual and historical convention that must be upheld in reincarnation of Living Buddhas: signed article

    Lot-drawing ceremony is a traditional religious ritual and historical convention that must be upheld in reincarnation of Living Buddhas

    For a long time, the 14th Dalai Lama has been spreading fallacies and misleading public opinion on the issue of selecting the reincarnations of late Living Buddhas. Recently, he has gone further, falsely claiming that the golden urn lot-drawing system has adopted improper means and caused serious damage to Xizang. His intention is to negate the legal status of the system, thereby repudiating the sovereign jurisdiction of the central government over Xizang, creating an illusion that Xizang was historically an “independent state,” and seeking so-called legitimacy for “Tibet independence.” In fact, the golden urn lot-drawing ceremony is an important innovation in the development of the Living Buddha reincarnation system in Tibetan Buddhism that dates back to the Qing Dynasty (1644-1911). The ceremony was established by law since the promulgation of the Imperially Approved Ordinance for Better Governance of Tibet (29-Article Ordinance) in 1793. Since then, it has become an essential procedure for the identification of the reincarnations of the Dalai Lama, the Panchen Erdeni and other grand Living Buddhas, gaining wide support and recognition from Tibetan Buddhists. The ceremony has played an important role in sustaining the healthy development and inheritance of Tibetan Buddhism and maintaining social stability in Xizang.

    I. The golden urn lot-drawing system is a result of conforming to historical trends

    The reincarnation of Living Buddhas is a method for religious leadership succession specific to Tibetan Buddhism. It was founded by the Karma Kagyu Sect in the 13th century and gradually adopted by other sects henceforth. Over the centuries, with the development and changes in the relation between politics and religion in Xizang, certain drawbacks in the reincarnation system were gradually exposed. In the Qing Dynasty, such problems became increasingly evident with Dharma protectors taking bribes and aristocrats colluding with temples to predetermine reincarnation candidates. Such behavior seriously disrupted the smooth successions of the grand Living Buddhas and even posed a potential threat to security in border areas.

    From the perspective of internal development, it became increasingly evident that members of the Tibetan aristocracy in the Qing Dynasty wantonly interfered with the selection and identification of reincarnations, in an attempt to expand their influence. When identifying reincarnations, the behavior of Chos Skyongs, or Dharma protectors who were responsible for practicing divination by drawing divining sticks or tossing coins, were left unchecked. Bribed by ecclesiastical and secular forces, they arbitrarily specified reincarnations — therefore most of the selected boys came from aristocratic families, seriously undermining the sanctity and fairness of the reincarnation system. For instance, when searching for the Eighth Dalai Lama’s reincarnation, although the Qing Dynasty government sent the third Zhangjia Living Buddha to Xizang to preside over related matters, the finally selected boy was related to the sixth Panchen; the younger brother and nephew of the third Zhangjia Living Buddha were respectively identified as the Nagya and Rakho Living Buddhas; the elder and younger brothers of the sixth Panchen became the Dhunpa Hutuktu of Tashilhumpo Monastery and the 10th Living Buddha of the red hat system of Karma Kagyu Sect respectively; one niece of the sixth Panchen was the Samding Dorje Phagmo Living Buddha. All these examples demonstrate manipulation by family forces on reincarnations. In response, Emperor Qianlong lamented in his article on Lamas that the reincarnations of grand Lamas seemed to have come from one family, which is almost the same as a hereditary title.

    From the perspective of the external political environment, the two invasions of Xizang by the Gorkha Tribe (located in central Nepal today) in the 18th century made the Qing Dynasty government realize that the lack of supervision over the selection of reincarnations of Living Buddhas in Tibetan Buddhism posed a threat to border stability. In 1779, the sixth Panchen traveled to Chengde to celebrate Emperor Qianlong’s 70th birthday, and received large amounts of tributes from Mongolian and Tibetan noblemen as well as generous rewards granted by the emperor along the way and during his stay in Beijing. Unfortunately, after the sixth Panchen passed away in Beijing, all these properties were controlled by one of his brothers — Dhunpa Hutuktu. However, another brother of his — the 10th Living Buddha of the red hat system of Karma Kagyu Sect — felt resentful and colluded with forces in Gorkha to invade Xizang and ransack the Tashilhunpo Monastery. The Qing Dynasty government sent troops to Xizang, with Fuk’anggan as the general. With the support of Tibetan monks and nuns, the Qing Dynasty troops forced the Gorkha troops to surrender and return the properties. The Gorkha invasion made the Qing Dynasty government realize that the combination of Living Buddha reincarnation and prominent families not only disrupted the succession order, but also posed deeper security risks. Failure to address this problem would lead to more serious border and territorial security issues. Faced with this grim situation, the Qing Dynasty government recognized the importance of strengthening the management of the reincarnation of Living Buddhas in Tibetan Buddhism.

    In the face of various drawbacks, the Qing Dynasty government followed the trend of historical development and formulated the golden urn lot-drawing system. After the end of the Gorkha War, the Qing government issued the Imperially Approved Ordinance for Better Governance of Tibet (29-Article Ordinance) (hereinafter referred to as the “Ordinance”) in 1793, the first of which stipulated the establishment of the lot-drawing system. This system has henceforth been written into the Qing Dynasty’s regulation for the department of foreign-related affairs and established at the legal level. According to the regulation, when searching for the reincarnations of grand Living Buddhas, the names and birthdates of the candidates need to be written on signboards in Manchu, Han and Tibetan languages, and placed in a specially made golden urn. The Qing Dynasty government’s high commissioner in Xizang and the grand Living Buddhas would officially draw the lot to identify the signs in front of the statue of Sakyamuni Buddha in Jokhang Temple, and report to the central government for approval after selection. There are two golden urns, one placed in the Jokhang Temple in Lhasa for identifying the reincarnations of the grand Living Buddhas in Xizang; the other is placed in the Yonghegong Lama Temple in Beijing and used to identify the reincarnations of the grand Living Buddhas in various parts of Mongolia and the Tibetan-inhabited areas of Gansu and Qinghai provinces.

    Therefore, the golden urn lot-drawing system ensures that the reincarnations and successions of the grand Living Buddhas of Tibetan Buddhism are carried out under standardized and orderly conditions, effectively avoiding jobbery and collusion between ecclesiastical and secular forces. It has had a profound and far-reaching impact on maintaining the purity and dignity of the Living Buddha reincarnation system and stabilizing the social order in Mongolian and Tibetan-inhabited areas. It is the result of conforming to the trend of historical development.

    II. The golden urn lot-drawing system is widely supported and recognized by the Tibetan Buddhism community

    The establishment of the golden urn lot-drawing system has hitherto been sincerely supported and actively practiced by the upper echelons of the Gelug Sect, including the Eighth Dalai Lama. After the issuance of the “Ordinance,” the Eighth Dalai Lama explicitly expressed his support for it and translated the text into Tibetan for publication across Xizang. In the subsequently issued proclamation for the Year of Water Buffalo, the Eighth Dalai Lama praised the golden urn lot-drawing system as the supreme grace of the central government to the monks and laymen of Xizang and the Gelug Sect, emphasizing the significance of this system for promoting Gelug and loving the people. At the same time, it was also clearly stated that after the implementation of the lot-drawing system, anyone who violates the regulations and selects the reincarnations willfully according to old customs will be severely punished. This proclamation not only demonstrated the respect of the Eighth Dalai Lama and the upper echelons of the Gelug Sect for the authority of the central government, but also showed their firm stance on maintaining the seriousness and purity of religious rituals, setting an example for various sects of Tibetan Buddhism to follow the system.

    Except for the Eighth Dalai Lama, many of the Gelug Sect Living Buddhas have demonstrated their recognition of the golden urn lot-drawing system through their actions. For instance, when the Qing court formulated the golden urn lot-drawing system, it took into account the distance between Lhasa and regions such as Chamdo, and permitted the recognition of reincarnations in those areas to proceed according to old practices. Nevertheless, the monasteries in Chamdo willingly undertook the arduous journey to Lhasa to conduct the golden urn lot-drawing ceremony. Under the leadership of the Living Buddha Pagbalha of Chamdo’s Galden Jampaling Monastery, reincarnations of major Living Buddhas from places such as Riwoqê and Chagyab traveled to Lhasa for the golden urn lot-drawing, fully reflecting the Tibetan Buddhist community’s acceptance of the ceremony. This voluntary practice clearly shows that from the moment the golden urn lot-drawing ceremony was introduced, it received widespread recognition within Tibetan Buddhist communities. The fairness, sanctity, and authority of the central government embodied in the system were highly acknowledged. After over 200 years of development, the system has become deeply rooted among both the religious and secular communities in Xizang.

    In addition, at the request of the Dalai Lama and the Gaxag government, several important golden urn lot-drawing ceremonies during the Qing Dynasty — for selecting the reincarnations of the Dalai Lama and Panchen Erdeni — were held in front of the memorial tablet of Emperor Kangxi and the portrait of Emperor Qianlong in the Potala Palace. This demonstrates the high regard and reverence the government of Xizang held for the central government and the golden urn lot-drawing system.

    Such support was not accidental, but rather the result of multiple factors. On the religious level, the golden urn lot-drawing ceremony inherited and standardized the traditional Tibetan Buddhist method of “divine judgment,” aligning with the doctrine of “the Buddha’s decision through dharma,” thereby ensuring the sanctity of the recognition process for reincarnations, meeting the religious inheritance needs of the various Tibetan Buddhist sects. On the political level, understanding the importance of the central government’s authority in helping maintain its influence in Xizang, the upper echelons of the Gelug Sect selected reincarnations by drawing lots from the golden urn and submitted the results for the central government’s approval, conferring upon the reincarnations the legitimacy granted by the central government. On the social level, the system effectively curbed the social tensions and religious disorder caused by aristocratic manipulation and fraud in the old reincarnation practices, which strongly preserved social order in Xizang and are in line with the fundamental interests of all Tibetan Buddhist sects and the broader public.

    III. The golden urn lot-drawing ceremony is the only path for recognizing the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama

    Since the establishment of the golden urn lot-drawing system, the reincarnations of the Dalai Lama from the Ninth to the 14th, as well as many grand Living Buddhas from other sects of Tibetan Buddhism, have been confirmed either through the golden urn lot-drawing ceremony or, in some cases, exemption from the ceremony with approval from the central government.

    After the reincarnation of the Eighth Dalai Lama was identified, the Gaxag government of Xizang — led by the regent Jedrung Hutuktu — submitted a petition in the name of all the monks and laymen of Xizang, requesting exemption from the golden urn lot-drawing ceremony. The Qing Dynasty government granted this request as an exception. However, after the Ninth Dalai Lama passed away, the Gaxag government, with the regent Demo Hutuktu and others, again requested an exemption from the golden urn lot-drawing ceremony for the reincarnation, which the Qing Dynasty government did not permit. Emperor Jiaqing sternly rebuked the request, stating that the exemption granted for the reincarnation of the Eighth Dalai Lama was a special case, and firmly reaffirmed the principle that the recognition of a Dalai Lama’s reincarnation must follow the golden urn lot-drawing procedure. Ultimately, on the 15th day of the first Lunar month in the second year of the Emperor Daoguang’s reign (1822), the first-ever golden urn lot-drawing ceremony for the Dalai Lama’s reincarnation was held, with Khenpo Kelzang Gyatso chosen as the reincarnation of the Ninth Dalai Lama. With the approval of the Qing government, he was formally enthroned at the Potala Palace as the 10th Dalai Lama. Thereafter, both the 11th and 12th Dalai Lamas were selected through the golden urn lot-drawing ceremony and formally enthroned with the approval of the central government. In the first year of the Emperor Guangxu’s reign (1875), the 12th Dalai Lama passed away. The following year, the local government of Xizang submitted a formal petition to the Imperial Commissioner in Xizang, bearing the seals and signatures of the Kalöns, major Hutuktus, and Khenpos of the three great monasteries, respectfully requesting an exemption from the lot-drawing procedure. After the Imperial Commissioner reported the matter to the central government of Qing Dynasty, the exemption was approved, and the candidate was officially recognized as the 13th Dalai Lama.

    In 1933, following the passing of the 13th Dalai Lama, the Nationalist Government, then the central authorities of China, sent representative Huang Musong to Xizang to offer official condolences. In 1936, it issued a set of measures on the reincarnation of Living Buddhas. The regulations inherited Qing Dynasty’s approach to governing Xizang by managing the reincarnation of Living Buddhas through legal means, clearly defining the scope of reincarnation, the reporting procedures for reincarnations, and the recognition process for different levels of Living Buddhas. The regulations reaffirmed key principles such as confirming reincarnations through drawing lots from the golden urn and having central government representatives to preside over the enthronement of grand Living Buddhas.

    In 1938, the regent Reting Rinpoche of Xizang submitted a petition to the central government requesting that the reincarnation of the 13th Dalai Lama be exempted from the golden urn lot-drawing. After negotiations with the local authorities of Xizang, the Nationalist Government proposed conditions for the exemption: first, Wu Zhongxin, chief of the Mongolian and Tibetan Affairs Commission of the Nationalist Government, must personally travel to Xizang to verify whether the boy truly exhibited spiritual signs; second, Reting Rinpoche must formally submit a written request to the central government to officially seek exemption from the golden urn lot-drawing procedure. On February 5, 1940, the Nationalist Government issued an order approving Lhamo Thondup as the reincarnation of the 13th Dalai Lama, exempting him from the golden urn lot-drawing ceremony, and specially authorizing him to succeed as the 14th Dalai Lama. On February 22, Wu Zhongxin and Reting Rinpoche jointly presided over the enthronement ceremony of the 14th Dalai Lama. These historical facts demonstrate that the legitimacy of the 14th Dalai Lama also derived from the approval of the central government.

    Not only is this true for the lineage of the Dalai Lamas, but also for the lineages of other grand Living Buddhas, such as the Gelug sect’s Panchen Erdeni, the Jebtsundamba Khutuktu, the Jamyang Hutuktu, as well as those of the Karma Kagyu Sect’s Black Hat Living Buddhas and the Nyingma Sect’s Dojezhak Living Buddha — all of whom had their reincarnations selected through the golden urn lot-drawing ceremony. History fully demonstrates that the central government, in accordance with the law, holds the final approval authority over the recognition of reincarnations. The selection of a reincarnated Dalai Lama through drawing lots from the golden urn and subsequent approval by the central government is the only path for confirming the Dalai Lama’s reincarnation.

    A review of history clearly shows that the system of the golden urn lot-drawing ceremony was an important measure adopted by the Qing Dynasty central government to eliminate malpractice in the recognition process of reincarnations in Tibetan Buddhism and improve the reincarnation system of Living Buddhas. This measure not only reflected the central government’s respect for Tibetan Buddhism and its followers, but also demonstrated its authority in matters concerning the reincarnation of grand Living Buddhas such as the Dalai Lama. It remains a fundamental principle that must be upheld in the reincarnation of grand Living Buddhas in Tibetan Buddhism.

  • Central government approval is fundamental principle, legal safeguard of Grand Living Buddha reincarnation: signed article

    Central government approval is fundamental principle, legal safeguard of Grand Living Buddha reincarnation: signed article

    Approval from the Central Government is the Fundamental Principle and Legal Safeguard of Reincarnation of the Grand Living Buddhas

    In the Tibetan Buddhist reincarnation system, the three fundamental principles of “search within the Chinese territory, drawing lots from the golden urn, and approval from the central government” form a comprehensive and rigorous framework for succession. This system serves as a vital safeguard for national unity, ethnic solidarity, and the proper order of Tibetan Buddhism. Among these principles, “approval by the central government” is the system’s ultimate and most essential step. Far from being a mere administrative formality, it carries profound historical logic, legal foundation, and practical significance. This principle is essential for ensuring an orderly reincarnation process, as well as for maintaining social stability and enduring peace.

    I. Central Government Approval as a Vital Manifestation of National Sovereignty

    Religious affairs constitute an integral part of state governance, and the management of Tibetan Buddhism affairs is a key responsibility of the central government. From a political perspective, the principle of “central government approval” specifies the national character of reincarnation, incorporating religious matters into the state governance framework. In history, successive central governments of China have managed reincarnation affairs through measures such as conferring titles on influential Living Buddhas and establishing regulatory mechanisms.

    In 1793, the Qing government promulgated the “Imperially Approved Ordinance for Better Governance of Tibet (29-Article Ordinance),” with its first article explicitly stipulating that the reincarnation of Living Buddhas had to follow the procedure of “drawing lots from the golden urn,” and affirming the central government’s approval authority over the reincarnation. In 1936, the government of the Republic of China issued the “Regulations on Lama Reincarnation,” mandating that the reincarnation of grand Living Buddhas must be reported to the central government before proceeding with historical conventions, traditional religious ritual search, the lot-drawing ceremony, and the final approval by the central government.

    Following the founding of the People’s Republic of China, the reincarnation of Tibetan Buddhism Living Buddhas has been managed by governments at various levels in accordance with the law. In 1959, the democratic reform abolished the feudal serfdom under theocracy in Xizang, liberating the reincarnation institution and ushering in a new era. Since 1949, the state has successfully overseen the reincarnations of several prominent Living Buddhas, including the 16th Living Buddha Karmapa, the 10th Panchen Erdeni, and the sixth Regent Reting Rinpoche. By 2024, 93 newly reincarnated Living Buddhas had been confirmed upon government approval.

    The principle of central government approval is not an externally imposed requirement but an inherent necessity for the reincarnation system’s own development — a crucial safeguard for maintaining religious order and preventing power abuses. The reincarnation of Living Buddhas is by no means merely an internal religious matter; rather, it reflects a convergence of national sovereignty, state authority, religious doctrine, and the sentiments of believers. Any interference or meddling by external forces constitutes a provocation to China’s sovereignty.

    II. Central Government Approval as a Prerequisite for Safeguarding National Unity and Social Stability

    Xizang is an inseparable part of China’s territory, and the Living Buddha reincarnation system, as a unique succession method in Tibetan Buddhism, is vital for national security and social stability. Allowing local or foreign forces to interfere in reincarnation affairs would pose an immediate threat to China’s national unity. The central government’s confirmation of the reincarnation fundamentally ensures that the reincarnation process remains within the legal and policy framework of the nation, preventing any attempts to exploit the system to split the country or undermine ethnic unity. Only by upholding the principle of “central government approval” can the succession of Living Buddhas consistently align with both national interests and the fundamental interests of the vast majority of religious believers.

    Moreover, central government approval reflects the Chinese government’s commitment to implementing the policy of freedom of religious belief.

    By managing reincarnation in accordance with laws and regulations, the central government not only respects Tibetan Buddhism’s traditional customs and religious rituals but also safeguards the legitimate rights and interests of believers, fostering harmony in religious relations.

    The lot-drawing ceremony was originally established precisely to prevent Mongolian and Tibetan aristocrats from exploiting reincarnation to seize religious power. Today, central government approval serves as a critical line of defense in the struggle against separatists. This governance model both honors religious traditions and defends national political security.

    III. Central Government Approval as a Legal Declaration of the Governance of Religious Affairs in a Modern State

    Every country, throughout history and across different regions, without exception, manages its religious affairs in accordance with the law. Currently, affairs related to the reincarnation of Living Buddhas are being carried out in accordance with China’s laws and regulations.

    The Regulations on Religious Affairs have clarified in legal form the approval authority for the reincarnation of Living Buddhas in Tibetan Buddhism. It stipulates that the succession of Living Buddhas in Tibetan Buddhism, under the guidance of Buddhist organizations, must be conducted in accordance with religious rituals and historical conventions, and must be reported to and approved by the religious affairs department of the people’s government at the provincial level or above, or by the people’s government at the provincial level or above.

    Article 9 of the Measures on the Management of the Reincarnation of Living Buddhas in Tibetan Buddhism stipulates that after the recognition of the reincarnation of the Living Buddhas, the case must be reported to and approved by the religious affairs department of the people’s government at the provincial or autonomous region level. For those with significant influence within the Buddhist community, approval must be obtained from the people’s government of the province or autonomous region. For those with major influence, approval must be obtained from the National Religious Affairs Administration. For those with particularly major influence, approval must be obtained from the State Council.

    Reincarnated Living Buddhas approved by the religious affairs department of the people’s government of a province or autonomous region, or by the people’s government of a province or autonomous region, must be filed with the National Religious Affairs Administration.

    Over the course of the years, the Dalai group has continuously advocated “Tibetan independence,” attempting to negate the central government’s decisive authority over the reincarnation of Living Buddhas. Through legal provisions and institutional design, the central government has clearly established the irreversible procedures for the reincarnation of Living Buddhas, namely searching within the Chinese territory, drawing lots from the golden urn, and approval from the central government. This has fundamentally eliminated the room for separatist forces to manipulate religious affairs.

    From the enshrinement of the golden urn in front of the Buddha statue in the Jokhang Temple in 1793 to the solemn approval by the State Council for the 11th Panchen Erdeni in 1995, the principle of “approval by the central government” has endured for three centuries. As a core component of the reincarnation of Living Buddhas in Tibetan Buddhism, the approval from the central government is both a choice of history and an inevitability of the times.

    It is deeply rooted in the historical pattern of China as a unified multi-ethnic nation, serves the practical need for the country’s long-term stability and security, and reflects the political wisdom of the Communist Party of China and the Chinese government in addressing religious issues. The governance logic that political power is above religious authority and national law is superior to religious rules provides a reference for multi-ethnic countries in handling religious affairs. As we advance toward the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation, the principle of central government approval will continue to play an irreplaceable role in maintaining national unity, ethnic solidarity, and religious harmony. It will also contribute Chinese wisdom to global religious governance.

  • COPEDU PLC posts over Frw 3.42 billion profit in 2024

    COPEDU PLC posts over Frw 3.42 billion profit in 2024

    During the meeting, shareholders were commended for their decision to increase equity participation, a move aimed at supporting the construction of COPEDU PLC’s new headquarters.

    According to the institution’s financial report, customer deposits rose by 11% to Frw 32.3 billion, up from Frw 24.8 billion. Total assets also increased by 9%, from Frw 46.3 billion to Frw 51.25 billion. Member savings grew by Frw 3.83 billion during the same period, climbing from Frw 34 billion to Frw 38 billion.

    Vestine Nyiraneza, Chairperson of the Board of Directors, praised the institution’s strong performance, noting that 95% of COPEDU PLC’s 2024 goals had been successfully met.

    “COPEDU PLC is in a strong position overall. Achieving 95% of our annual targets is a testament to the commitment and hard work of our entire team,” she said.

    “This progress is the result of unified efforts by shareholders, leadership, staff, and our partners across various sectors.”

    Beyond its financial achievements, COPEDU PLC continued to contribute to national development by supporting women’s empowerment, particularly in promoting income-generating activities and access to financial services.

    With over 27 years of operation, COPEDU PLC now operates 11 branches nationwide, six of which are managed by women.

    Women also hold 70% of the company’s shares, 66% of positions on the executive committee, and represent 63% of the total workforce, further reinforcing the institution’s commitment to inclusive growth.

    Vestine Nyiraneza, Chairperson of the Board of Directors, praised the institution’s strong performance, noting that 95% of COPEDU PLC’s 2024 goals had been successfully met.
    One of the founders of COPEDU PLC, Gakuba Jeanne D’Arc, told the shareholders that they should learn to draw strength from within and find homegrown solutions to their problems instead of relying on foreign aid.
    The Managing Director of COPEDU PLC, Muyango Raïsa, stated that the institution’s assets increased by 9%.
    The institution announced its performance during the Annual General Meeting held on June 29, 2025, in Kigali, where shareholders were also updated on key milestones and future plans.
    COPEDU Plc board members attended the meeting.
    The management and staff of COPEDU PLC attended the general meeting.
    The meeting brought together shareholders from across the country.
  • Echoes of July 1: Reflections on Rwanda’s Independence

    Echoes of July 1: Reflections on Rwanda’s Independence

    With these powerful words, Mugesera Antoine, a member of Rwanda Elders Advisory Forum, captures the painful reality that followed Rwanda’s independence on July 1, 1962.

    In an exclusive interview with IGIHE, he reflects not only on the symbolic and historic significance of that day, but also on the deep disappointment that unfolded in its aftermath, a betrayal of national hope that still echoes through Rwanda’s history.

    Mugesera was among those present at the official Independence Day celebrations in Kigali in 1962. He remembers the moment vividly: the excitement, the expectation, the joy. After decades of colonial rule under Belgium, Rwandans believed independence would open the door to peace, dignity, and national unity. But for many, that dream was quickly and violently shattered.

    “For about three years leading up to independence,” he said, “Rwanda had been going through unusual events. King Rudahigwa had died, political parties emerged in 1959, houses were set on fire, people were burned alive, things never seen before in Rwanda. People were being killed… We dreamed that when independence came, things would change for the better.”

    But independence did not mark the beginning of reconciliation. Instead, the trauma that began in 1959, following the fall of the monarchy, intensified.

    Tutsis were targeted, many were killed, others had their homes destroyed, and thousands fled to neighboring countries as refugees. Rwanda was being torn apart, not by its colonial masters, but by internal divisions that colonial rule had helped create and deepen.

    After the Independence Day speech, students marched proudly with paper flags, and local leaders wore sashes in the colors of the new Rwandan flag.

    Mugesera recounted that many Rwandans were bewildered by this violence. “We used to ask our parents, ‘What is happening? Why are people you once lived with setting homes on fire?’ They would say, ‘The Belgians turned us against each other.’ So we thought that once the Belgians left, Rwandans would live together again, just as they had done peacefully for centuries.”

    Even amid the bloodshed, there remained hope. Songs were sung with lyrics like, “Let the Belgians go back home so that we can become Rwandans again.” This hope, however, began to fade soon after the official celebration. Mugesera explained that within days of independence, violence returned.

    The Inyenzi, a group of young exiled Rwandans denied the right to return home, launched attacks. In response, some individuals including children, and the innocent were executed in cold blood.

    He recalled, “The celebration happened, and we were joyful, thinking a new chapter was beginning. But that hope quickly faded. Every time something happened, people were killed… Just three or four days after independence, the Inyenzi attacked, and people were killed, accused of being collaborators. Children captured at the time were killed in Nyamagumba, Ruhengeri.”

    Yet, for a brief moment on July 1, 1962, there was unity and national pride. Mugesera vividly described the Independence Day celebrations. The day began with a solemn Mass at Sainte Famille church, presided over by Monsignor Perraudin and attended by various priests and dignitaries. The main celebrations took place at a field that now houses the City of Kigali headquarters.

    “At around 10:00 a.m.,” he said, “the Belgian representative stood up to speak. He was wearing a sharply cut diplomatic suit. After his brief speech, a trumpet sounded, and soldiers marched to the flagpole. The Belgian flag was lowered, and the Rwandan flag was raised.”

    The new President, Grégoire Kayibanda, gave a speech filled with messages of peace, words Mugesera still remembers. “I don’t remember the entire speech, but I distinctly remember him speaking about peace. That word stayed with me, and I thought to myself, ‘we’re finally going to see peace,’ especially since we had just gone through some very troubling times.”

    After the speech, students marched proudly with paper flags, and local leaders wore sashes in the colors of the new Rwandan flag. Each prefecture performed songs, dances, and traditional games that reflected their culture. “You felt like you were seeing all of Rwanda’s beauty in one place,” Mugesera recalled. “It was something we’d never witnessed before… It was beautiful.”

    But that beauty, he emphasized, was tragically short-lived.

    “The joy and hope of independence was short-lived,” Mugesera said. “I would compare it to a pregnant woman who expects a healthy baby, only to give birth to a child with a disability, or to miscarry entirely. What you had envisioned doesn’t come to pass.”

    He continued, “Rwandans were wronged, many died. We were said to be independent, but far more people died after independence than before. Independence brought more harm than what existed prior. Instead of progressing, we began to regress. It was like a journey downhill, and it only got worse. Rather than development, everything deteriorated, until it culminated in the Genocide.”

    According to Mugesera, the issue was not independence itself, nor the fall of the monarchy, after all, monarchies have ended in other countries without catastrophe. The problem lay in the kind of leadership that came to power. It institutionalized ethnic hatred and deepened divisions.

    “Independence should have been a launchpad for progress, but instead, we fell backward because of bad governance,” he said.

    For over three decades, Rwanda was governed by a regime that thrived on discrimination and hatred, leading eventually to the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi. But Mugesera believes that Rwanda has now found its footing. Today, he sees hope again, this time, rooted in responsible and inclusive leadership.

    “If we are fortunate, we will continue to have good leaders. Right now, we do. And if we’re lucky enough to keep having capable, responsible leaders, whether they are Twa, Hutu, or Tutsi—as long as they are healthy-minded individuals who care about Rwanda, we will move forward.”

    He concluded with a vision that embraces unity over division: “We need leadership that sees all Rwandans. Anyone with sound political thinking will lead us well; but those driven by extremist ideologies will only take us backward.”

    Rwanda’s independence was not the end of struggle—it was, in many ways, the beginning of a painful and defining chapter. But today, with the lessons of history in hand, the country continues its journey forward, striving to fulfill the promise that so many believed in on that day in July 1962.

    Mugesera Antoine, a member of Rwanda Elders Advisory Forum, captured the painful reality that followed Rwanda’s independence on July 1, 1962.
  • African Single Electricity Market program gains momentum: AU officials

    African Single Electricity Market program gains momentum: AU officials

    The remarks were made at the High-Level Technical Meeting on AfSEM and the African Continental Power System Master Plan on Monday at the AU headquarters in Addis Ababa, the capital of Ethiopia.

    Speaking at the event, Kamugisha Kazaura, director of infrastructure and energy at the AU Commission, said the institutional and operational foundation has been laid for a unified African electricity market, which delivers clean, reliable and affordable power to every corner of the continent.

    “Activities are progressing well to define a common path forward to address critical technical and regulatory gaps and explore continental strategies for renewable energy deployment, trading, and manufacturing,” Kazaura said.

    Noting that more than 600 million Africans are still without access to electricity, Kazaura called for urgent and sustainable action to meet Africa’s rapidly growing energy demand through the full implementation of the AfSEM.

    Simbini Tichakunda, principal program officer at the African Union Development Agency-New Partnership for African Development, said Africa is standing on the brink of an energy revolution that promises to transform the continent’s economic future.

    “The dream of AfSEM is coming to life. The 400 KV seamless power integration between Kenya and Tanzania, linking the grids of Kenya and Tanzania and synchronizing them with those of Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, is a major step forward,” Tichakunda noted.

    He said the Eastern African Power Pool will be connected to the Southern African Power Pool by 2027.

    The two-day meeting is expected to discuss how to de-risk investment in power infrastructure and strengthen institutional readiness at the national and regional levels.

  • RGB launches online services for legal compliance of faith-based organizations

    RGB launches online services for legal compliance of faith-based organizations

    This digital transformation marks a significant step in the Government of Rwanda’s commitment to enhancing good governance and improving public service delivery through technology.

    The new IremboGov portal allows FBOs to submit required documentation and track the status of their applications conveniently from any location.

    The online services enable FBOs to apply for collaboration letters and establish branches, aiming to enhance efficiency and transparency in the application and approval processes.

    According to a statement released on June 30, all submitted applications will be reviewed by the City of Kigali or relevant District authorities to ensure alignment with national development goals.

    This platform also strengthens RGB’s capacity to provide timely support, feedback, and maintain an up-to-date database.

    Both RGB and Irembo will offer guidance and technical assistance to ensure a smooth and user-friendly experience for all stakeholders.

    RGB has launched online services for legal compliance of faith-based organizations.
  • Trump signs order ending most sanctions on Syria

    Trump signs order ending most sanctions on Syria

    “The Order removes sanctions on Syria while maintaining sanctions on (ousted former Syrian president) Bashar al-Assad… The Order permits the relaxation of export controls on certain goods and waives restrictions on certain foreign assistance to Syria,” said the White House.

    Following the order, five executive orders that created the existing Syria sanctions program were immediately terminated, while the State Department issued a 180-day waiver of sanctions under the Caesar Act.

    The U.S. Treasury Department already took the first step in lifting sanctions on Syria by issuing a general license, known as GL25, to authorize transactions involving the interim Syrian government, its central bank and state-owned enterprises.

    Sanctions on Assad, his associates, human rights abusers, drug traffickers, persons linked to chemical weapons activities, ISIS and their affiliates and Iranian proxies will remain in place, according to White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt.

    Under the order, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio is directed to “explore avenues for sanctions relief at the United Nations.”

    Rubio is also directed to review the designations of Syria as a “State On the eighth of December 2024, of Terrorism,” Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) as a foreign terrorist organization, and its leader, Syrian interim chief Ahmed al-Sharaa, as a “Specially Designated Global Terrorist.”

    The Trump administration will “continue to monitor progress on key priorities” including steps toward normalizing ties with Israel and helping the United States prevent a resurgence of ISIS, according to the White House.

    Amid the upheaval in the Middle East, Trump told al-Sharaa in Saudi Arabia in May that the United States would lift sanctions and explore normalizing relations as a major policy shift.

    The 54-year Assad’s rule over Syria abruptly ended on Dec. 8, 2024, and days afterward, leaders of HTS, the primary force behind the offensive during Syria’s prolonged 13-year war, formed an interim government. Since then, the new government has scrambled to restore order, rebuild institutions, and reach out to regional and global partners.

    White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt speaks during a press briefing at the White House in Washington, D.C., the United States, on June 30, 2025. U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday signed an executive order terminating Syria sanctions, according to the White House website. (Xinhua/Hu Yousong)
  • Victoire Ingabire’s case submitted to court

    Victoire Ingabire’s case submitted to court

    The disclosure was made in a statement released on Monday, June 30.

    “Following an investigation by the Rwanda Investigation Bureau, which was submitted to the National Public Prosecution Authority [NPPA] on 24 June 2025, the NPPA has filed a case with the Primary Court of Kicukiro, requesting pre-trial detention for Ingabire Umuhoza Victoire,” the statement read.

    Ingabire, founder of the unregistered political party DALFA-Umurinzi, was arrested on June 19, 2025, following a decision by the High Court of Kigali.

    The court made the decision after establishing that there were strong reasons to suspect Ingabire’s involvement in a conspiracy with nine individuals, including journalist Theoneste Nsengimana, accused of participating in training sessions allegedly aimed at overthrowing the government.

    Ingabire admitted that eight of the nine individuals, excluding journalist Nsengimana, were former members of DALFA-Umurinzi, but insisted that the party was not behind the organization of the training sessions, and that she personally had no knowledge of them.

    According to the Prosecution Authority, the charges against Ingabire involve offenses that threaten public security.

    The National Public Prosecution Authority has submitted Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza’s case to the Kicukiro Primary Court, seeking a pre-trial detention.