Category: Justice

  • Félicien Kabuga refuses to appear in court as trial begins in substance

    The hearing of opening statements began on Thursday 29th September 2022 but Kabuga boycotted the court as revealed by Iain Bonomy, the presiding judge at the UN tribunal.

    Bonomy said that Kabuga is in good health but did neither accept to attend in-person nor virtually.

    The MICT recently rejected the request of Lawyer Philippe Larochelle who requested the suspension of Kabuga’s trial awaiting the ruling on suggested replacement of defence lawyer.

    On 5th September, Lawyer Larochelle appealed against the ruling dismissing the request to replace Emmanuel Altit as Kabuga’s defence lawyer.

    He claimed that Kabuga was denied rights to choose a preferred defence lawyer which ‘would have a negative effect on court’s proceedings’.

    On 20th September 2022, MICT validated the relevance for Kabuga’s defence plea but rejected the request to suspend the trial.

    According to The New York Times, Kabuga refused to appear in court, saying in a note that it was in protest against a refusal to let him change lawyers, but judges ordered that the proceedings should go ahead and asked the prosecution to read its opening statement.

    Kabuga is charged with several counts including five related to genocide; genocide, complicity in genocide, director and public incitement to commit genocide, attempt to commit genocide and conspiracy to commit genocide.

    Other charges are persecution and extermination, both as crimes against humanity.

    Arrested on 16th May 2020 in France, Kabuga was transferred to a UN tribunal in The Hague for stand trial. He is known as the Chief Financier of Genocide against Tutsi.

    Kabuga was a wealthy businessman and core member of the Akazu (a small powerful circle of ideologues that masterminded the Genocide). He was also the founding president of the board of shareholders of hate radio RTLM, which incited killings.

    Kabuga was originally scheduled to appear in court in Arusha, where the other arm of the MICT resides, but judges had ruled he would remain in The Hague “until otherwise decided.”

    Kabuga was a wealthy businessman and core member of the Akazu.

  • Prosecution seeks 20-year sentence for Bamporiki

    The Prosecution made the request as Bamporiki’s trial in substance began on Wednesday 21st September 2022.

    The prosecution revealed that this crime was investigated, after a businessman identified as Gatera Norbert who owns the Norbert Business Group that produces alcoholic drinks, wrote to Rwanda Investigation Bureau (RIB) complaining about the injustice done to him by Bamporiki.

    The businessman said that he harassed him and asked for a bribe, threatening him to close his businesses.

    They include a Gin factory and a garden known as the Romantic Garden hosting weddings and other social gatherings in Gisozi.

    Eight days after filing a complaint to RIB, Gatera wrote to the City of Kigali that his factory was closed because it did not meet the requirements, according to information provided by Bamporiki.

    He advised himself to seek out Bamporiki’s help to get his business to reopen. At that time he asked him for the amount of money he would be willing to halt the closure of his businesses.

    They agreed to meet at the Grande Legacy Hotel, Bamporiki assured him that he would connect him with the Vice Mayor of the City of Kigali in charge of Urbanization and Infrastructure, Dr. Merard Mpabwanamaguru, and help him open the factory.

    On the evening of May 4, 2022, Gatera nd his friend met Bamporiki with Mpabwanamaguru.

    At that time, Bamporiki asked Gatera to go and bring the money, when he brought it, Bamporiki gave the order to put it at the ‘Reception’.

    When they were sitting at the hotel, the four of them continued to have dinner until 24 minutes past midnight on May 5, 2022.

    At that time, they were going out, they were arrested in the parking lot because Gatera had informed the police. Some of the money was found in Mpabwanamaguru’s car, some in Bamporiki’s, while the rest was at the Reception.

    The prosecution revealed that Bamporiki, purposely acting as he would close Gatera’s factory, asked for a bribe of Rwf10 million so that he would not report the factory.

    As the prosecution said, when Bamporiki saw that Gatera was not going to give him the Rwf10 million bribe, he hurried to inform Vice Mayor Mpabwanamaguru, who immediately went to close the factory.

    The prosecution also indicated that he exercised his authority, after Gatera agreed to give him money where Bamporiki called Vice Mayor Mpabwanamaguru to come and meet with Gatera, to open the factory.

    Another piece of evidence produced by the Prosecution is that Bamporiki was questioned and admitted to have reported the factory.

    He also assured Gatera that if he gave him the money, his company would be opened and he would work and develop.

    On the crime of using the power given to him by law for his own benefit, the Prosecutor explained that when Gatera’s wife was arrested, Bamporiki asked her for Rwf10 million to get her released.

    These are the things that the Prosecution says that Mr. Bamporiki himself admitted during interrogation.

    In his defense, Bamporiki began by apologizing to the entire Rwandan community, noting that he hurried to explain what happened and apologized realizing that what he did could be a crime.

    Bamporiki said that Mpabwanamaguru came to see him and told him that there was news that the City of Kigali found out that he was the co-owner of a company with Gatera Norbert, that is causing problems to people.

    At that time, he replied that the factory belonged to Gatera. That was the information he gave him, as opposed to the fact that he demanded that the factory be closed.

    After the factory was closed, Gatera went to Bamporiki’s house and told him that his factory was closed and that Mpabwanamaguru could help him to open it.

    At that time, Bamporiki called Mpabwanamaguru and told him that his friend’s factory was closed, the other told him that it was not him who closed it, but it was done by the City’s management.

    “I’m in front of the court and I’m telling the truth as much as I can about what happened and I’m not omitting anything,” he said.

    Bamporiki is said to have had a meeting with Gatera to connect him with Mpabwanamaguru to negotiate, which ended on May 4, 2022.

    Bamporiki had called Mpabwanamaguru and told him that they could meet and watch a football match, and that is how they ended up at the Grande Legacy Hotel.

    When he arrived, he told him that he was with his friend Gatera who is the owner of the factory which got closed.

    Bamporiki said that what he accepts and aplogize, is that they told him that they brought money, and told them to drop it at the Reception.

    Mpabwanamaguru is said to have conveyed to him the request to open the factory and visited them, telling them that it is not possible because the place where it was operating in Gisozi is not dedicated for factories, and advise them to relocate it to Masoro, in the Special Economic Zone.

    Bamporiki says that in the end, all four of them continued to watch the football and have a drink. As he said, they found the Police officers waiting for them outside as they left the hotel.

    Bamporiki told the Court that the money brought by Gatera and his friend was not brought to him as they had told him that they only prepared a beer for Mpabwanamaguru.

    Of the money, Rwf2 million was taken to Mpabwanamaguru’s car, and the rest was dropped at the Reception to be used to pay for drinks, according to Bamporiki.

    In conclusion, he said that out of respect for the Judges, what he owes to the President of Rwanda and Rwandans, he never advised Gatera to close his factory.

    He stressed that he has no authority to close or open the factory, especially because the Kigali Municipality has the authority, and he pointed out that the factory was opened the day after his arrest.

    In releasing Gatera’s wife, Bamporiki said that what he did was advocacy, not imposing what to do.

    At that time, he called RIB and asked if the woman was with them. They explained what she had done, and then she was released.

    Bamporiki was represented by lawyers Evode Kayitana and Jean Baptiste Habyarimana.

    Lawyer Habyarimana said that according to the law, the person he is defending has not committed a crime because there is no evidence that he asked for or received a bribe.

    The prosecution concluded by asking the Court to validate the accusations against Bamporiki, asked for a 10-year prison sentence and a fine five times the bribe he solicited.

    This makes it Rwf20 million times five.

    For the crime of using the power given to him by law for his own benefit, they requested that he should be sentenced to 10 years in prison and a fine of Rwf100 million.

    In combining the penalties, the prosecution requested that he should be sentenced to a total of 20 years in prison and be charged a fine of Rwf200 million.

    Bamporiki said that it is an extreme punishment where he would be no longer useful to Rwanda. He asked the court to review his case and grant him mercy.

    His lawyer Habyarimana said that his sentence should be no more than five years, with bail, in case his client is found guilty.

    The ruling will be read on September 30, 2022, at 8 am.

    ca-eaf5f.jpg

  • Bamporiki Edouard arraigned before court

    Bamporiki appeared before the court in the morning of Friday 16th September 2022.

    The former state minister who could not be seen by journalists upon arrival at the court’s premises, exited the courtroom through the exit door normally designated for judges.

    He appeared before the court wearing glasses, a blue trouser, suit and white shirt without a defence lawyer.

    As the hearing began, Bamporiki told judges that he was not ready for the court’s session without his defence lawyer who was attending elections of Rwanda Bar Association (RBA) taking place on the same day.

    The court accepted his request and adjourned the hearing to 21st September 2022 at 8:00 a.m.

    Bamporiki was suspended from his duties in May this year owing to matters of accountability that were under investigation and placed under house arrest.

    Following his suspension, Bamporiki posted a message on his Twitter handle admitting that he received a bribe and apologized to the President of the Republic.

    Article 4 of the law N° 54/2018 of 13/08/2018 on fighting against corruption states that any person who offers, solicits, accepts or receives, by any means, an illegal benefit for himself/ herself or another person or accepts a promise in order to render or omit a service under his or her mandate or uses his or her position to render or omit a service, commits an offence.

    Upon conviction, he/she is liable to imprisonment for a term of more than five (5) years but not more than seven (7) years with a fine of three (3) to five (5) times the value of the illegal benefit offered, solicited or received.

    Bamporiki has appeared before court in a blue suit, trouser white shirt and glasses.cacana.jpgcaca.jpg

  • Nigerian government takes striking university lecturers to court

    Urging the National Industrial Court to determine the legality of the strike, the Nigerian government had sued the striking lecturers under the aegis of the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) for affecting public universities in the country since Feb. 14.

    The seven-month strike by ASUU so far had demanded, among others, the renegotiation of welfare, government funding for the revitalization of public universities, earned academic allowances, and promotion arrears.

    Talks between the government and the ASUU continued to yield no result, leading to the prolonged strike by the lecturers.

    Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari last month called on the striking lecturers to reconsider their decision and return to the classroom, noting such prolonged interruption of education could undermine the nation’s development of human capital.

    On Sunday, the Ministry of Labor and Employment said in a statement it was requesting an order from the court for members of the lecturers’ union to resume work in their various universities while the issues in dispute are being addressed in consonance with the law.

  • Trial of Karasira postponed again

    The worries have been expressed by Karasira’s Defence Lawyer, Gatera Gashabana as he appeared before Nyarugenge Intermediate Court on Friday 2nd September 2022.

    He said that his client is not ready to stand trial because electronic files could not be accessed and requested adjournment to make enough preparations.

    The Prosecution said that the challenges should have been communicated earlier. however, it maintained that they need to be given time for preparations as per legal provisions but in consideration that there should be no further excuses leading to further postponement on agreed date.

    After assessing the request of Gashabana, the court rescheduled the trial for 7th October 2022.

    Karasira who once served as a lecturer at the University of Rwanda, has been detained for over one year. He denies alleged charges.

    Karasira’s trial in substance has been postponed at different times.

    Karasira once served as a lecturer at the University of Rwanda.

  • Félicien Kabuga to go on trial in substance

    “The Chamber orders the trial to commence at the Hague branch with opening statements on the 29th of September… and evidence to start on the 5th of October,” MICT judge Iain Bonomy said.

    Kabuga is charged with seven counts including five related to genocide; genocide, complicity in genocide, director and public incitement to commit genocide, attempt to commit genocide and conspiracy to commit genocide.

    Other charges are persecution and extermination, both as crimes against humanity.

    Arrested on 16th May 2020 in France, Kabuga was transferred to a UN tribunal in The Hague for stand trial. He is known as the Chief Financier of Genocide against Tutsi.

    He was a wealthy businessman and core member of the Akazu (a small powerful circle of ideologues that masterminded the Genocide). He was also the founding president of the board of shareholders of hate radio RTLM, which incited killings.

    Kabuga was originally scheduled to appear in court in Arusha, where the other arm of the MICT resides, but judges had ruled he would remain in The Hague “until otherwise decided.”

    According to AFP, Bonomy said on Thursday that the defendant would appear “three times a week for two hours at a time.”

    Kabuga is being held at the tribunal’s detention unit a few kilometres (miles) away.

    Félicien Kabuga's trial is set for September 2022.

  • Musanze medical practitioner handed 25-year jail term over defilement

    The ruling was read on Thursday 28th July 2022.

    It is said that Iradukunda went missing in November 2020. Her body was found later in a beans’ farmland in Gacaca Sector where her legs, arms and neck were tied with a rope.

    During trial proceedings, Maniriho faced charges including defilement, murder and attempt to perform abortion on Iradukunda in November 2020.

    The court acquitted him on the charge of attempt to perform illegal abortion and murder crime noting that the Prosecution lacked enough evidences.

    During trial in substance on 8th March 2022, the Prosecution requested life sentence for Maniriho.

    The Prosecution alleged that Maniriho admitted to the crimes of murder and attempt to perform abortion during interrogation but denied the charges as the trial began.

    It also accused Maniriho of intentional murder explaining that his house was searched where investigators found a rope similar to the one that the girl’s body was tied with in a beans’ farmland on 2nd November 2020.

    They also discovered a mat at his home stained with blood and a hammer triggering suspicion that the girl was killed.

    As per report from Rwanda Forensic Laboratory, the tested blood from the mat showed that the sample contained Maniriho and Iradukunda’s DNA information.

    The doctor who carried out the tests was summoned in court to present a detailed report which informed the court’s decision.

    Maniriho had been arrested on 9th November 2020.

  • Munyenyezi arraigned in court for trial in substance

    Munyenyezi appeared before the court on Tuesday 19th July 2022 around 9:00 a.m. with combed hair, wearing inmates’ uniform, sandals and glasses.

    As the trial began, her defence lawyer requested the court to allow her client to stand trial sitting down citing sickness reasons and responded in favour.

    The Prosecution told the court that Munyenyezi is facing charges including manslaughter as Genocide crime, preparation of Genocide, direct or indirect mobilization to perpetrate Genocide, conspiracy during Genocide, extermination as a crime against humanity.

    She was deported to Rwanda on 16th April 2021 from the United States of America (USA).

    It is suspected that Munyenyezi committed the crimes in former Commune Ngoma, Butare Prefecture currently in Huye District of Southern Province.

    Her defence lawyers include Bruce Bikotwa and Gashema.

    The Prosecution has revealed that Munyenyezi is the wife of Arsène Shalom Ntahobali and daughter-in-law of Pauline Nyiramasuhuko, the former Minister of Family and Women’s Affairs during the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi.

    The Prosecution alleged that Munyenyezi and her husband along with her mother-in-law controlled roadblocks including the one mounted near Ihuriro Hotel which sheltered Nyiramasuhuko.

    She has been accused of attending and leading meetings organized to plan for the killings of targeted Tutsi victims.

    The Prosecution accused Munyenyezi of killing a nun who resided in Tumba using a pistol. He was also accused of having arrested Tutsi girls at roadblocks and ordering Interahamwe to rape them.

    According to the Prosecution, a witness identified Jean Damascène Munyaneza alias Saddam testified that Munyenyezi was at a roadblock at Mukoni in 1994 when she went to a nearby place where Tutsis were being killed and saw an Interahamwe identified as Lambert Habyarimana raping a nun.

    As the Prosecution said, Munyenyezi took a pistol and shot the nun on the head after telling Munyenyezi that they would be held accountable.

    Another witness identified as Jean Paul Rutiganda is also said to have told the Prosecution that Munyenyezi shot dead the nun after enduring rape.

    Munyenyezi rejected the charges claiming that she didn’t go to any roadblock because she was a pregnant mother taking care of another kid.

    The suspect said that witnesses don’t know the person being accused because they revealed, she was studying at the National University of Rwanda yet she has not completed secondary school.

    Munyenyezi said that the two witnesses provide contradictory statements because one accuses her of having killed the nun in an underground section of a hotel while another claims that she killed her at a roadblock at Mukoni.

    “It is clear that they don’t know what they say. I don’t know why they are telling lies about me,” she said.

    Her defence lawyers have told the court that the Prosecution does not present tangible evidences proving that Munyenyezi had a role in the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi.

    They insisted that the names of the nun Munyenyezi is alleged to have killed are not mentioned, which is among reasons pushing them to consider witnesses’ statements as false.

    The defence lawyers also said that witnesses’ statements are contradictory, proving that they don’t know Munyenyezi.

    They also argued that birth certificates of Munyenyezi and her children indicate that their client was pregnant and had another kid in 1994.

    “She was in her last days of pregnancy that she could not take a gun to hunt Tutsis.”

    The defence lawyers said that there are other cases of people from Butare including her husband Arsène Shalom Ntahobali tried by the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda in which Munyenyezi provided testimonies.

    When asked how she was invited as a witness yet she was not able to leave her house due to pregnancy, defence lawyers revealed that Munyenyezi went to provide testimonies regarding how her husband did not hunt Tutsis because he was suffering from Malaria.

    The Prosecution has objected that making disclosure of her pregnancy is not enough to sanitize Munyenyezi because there are no medical reports confirming that she was in critical condition.

    It was also highlighted that it is normal to have testimonies as per legal provisions and asked Munyenyezi to prove them wrong.

    On her education status, the Prosecution said that it is apparent that Munyenyezi was in secondary school where proving that she was a student at the time is enough.

    Prosecutors explained that defence lawyers do not present details of testimonies provided at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda to prove how they are contradictory.

    They also maintained that not knowing the names of killed nun is not enough to prove that witnesses are wrong.

    On the charge of conducting mobilization to perpetrate Genocide, the Prosecution alleged that Munyenyezi attended a meeting held at a playground in Rango where she held a speech and told people that Tutsis are enemies who had attacked the country.

    The Prosecution said that more witnesses accused Munyenyezi of having provided grenades to kill Tutsis at a roadblock mounted at Nkubi, issued instructions to Interhamwe to kill a child and arrest Tutsis at a roadblock nearby Ihuriro Hotel and kill them.

    Munyenyezi has said that she had no powers to give instructions to Interahamwe.

    She also denied having handed over girls to Interahamwe to be raped and attendance of the meeting in Rango.

    Her defence lawyers also defended her clients’ objections claiming that witnesses provided false testimonies because they do not prove how they are reliable.

    Even though Munyenyezi was not tried by Gacaca courts, the Prosecution indicated that testimonies pinning her were provided by survivors of the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi and perpetrators.

    Munyenyezi has however claimed that being a daughter-in-law of Nyiramasuhuko didn’t grant her powers of attending meetings and mobilizing the killings of Tutsis.

    Defence lawyers said that there are witnesses from Butare convicted of Genocide crimes who revealed that they do not know Munyenyezi and argued that there are no evidences pinning her.

    Munyenyezi denied alleged charges as she appeared before Huye Intermediate Court.

  • Former Prefect of Gikongoro, Bucyibaruta handed 20-year jail term over role in Genocide

    The court has also ordered immediate arrest of Bucyibaruta, 78, who has been under trial for two months over complicity in Genocide and crimes against humanity in Gikongoro prefecture which he headed during the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi.

    He was given ten days to have appealed against the verdict.

    During trial proceedings, the Prosecution had requested the court to hand life sentence to Bucyibaruta.

    At the heart of the case against the convict, were several “security” meetings, either ordered or attended by Bucyibaruta, which prosecutors had argued were actually planning sessions for the killings.

    Specifically, Bucyibaruta was accused of having persuaded thousands of people to take refuge in the Murambi Technical School, by promising them food, water and protection.

    Days later, in the early hours of April 21, tens of thousands of Tutsis were executed there.

    The court also examined Bucyibaruta’s responsibility in the massacre of around 90 Tutsi pupils at the Marie Merci school in Kibeho on 7th May 1994 and in the execution of Tutsi prisoners including three priests in Gikongoro prison.

    It is said that Bucyibaruta, who has been in France since 1997, has several health problems and was allowed to remain under house arrest during trial to receive treatments.

    Richard Gisagara, a lawyer who followed up the case has welcomed the ruling.

    “Let us reflect on victims in Kibeho, Murambi, Cyanika and Kaduha among others. I am grateful to those who entrusted me with heavy responsibilities to represent them,” he said.

    Bucyibaruta was born in Musange in1944. He served as the prefect of Gikongoro Prefecture from 4th July 1992 to July 1994.

    Initially, he fled to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and later went to France in 1997 where he lives up to date.

    The sentence handed to Bucyibaruta is considered as a great step made by France which was for long blamed over sheltering masterminds of Genocide against the Tutsi roaming freely.

    Following the visit of French President, Emmanuel Macron to Rwanda last year, the country pledged to work with Rwanda to bring to justice individuals suspected of role in the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi.

    Umbrella organizations of survivors of Genocide against the Tutsi and human rights activists had requested for trial of Bucyibaruta in 2000.

    Bucyibaruta has been handed 20-year jail term over his role in Genocide against the Tutsi.

  • Dr. Rutunga to be tried in substance

    His trial in substance set to begin on Tuesday 5th July 2022, will take place at the court based in Nyanza District.

    Dr. Rutunga, 72, was deported in 2021 from the Netherlands where he spent more than ten years.

    He is charged with crimes including complicity in committing Genocide and extermination as a crime against humanity.

    During the previous hearing last year, the Prosecution accused Rutunga to have committed the crimes between April 26 and 30, 1994 in former Butare Prefecture currently in Huye district where he was working as the Regional Director of the Rwanda Agricultural Research Institute (ISAR-Rubona).

    It is said that Dr. Rutunga invited Interahamwe militia to kill over 1000 Tutsi who fled to ISAR Rubona during the 1994 Genocide against Tutsi.

    He later fled to foreign countries and was denied asylum status by the Netherlands in 2000.

    He worked partially as a researcher at Wageningen University in The Netherlands prior to his arrest in 2019.

    Dr. Rutunga was born in 1949 in the former Ruhengeri Prefecture, currently Gakenke district in the Northen Province.

    During the 1994 Genocide against Tutsi, he lived in what is today Rubona village, Kiruhura cell, Ruhashya sector, Huye district in Southern Province.