Category: Justice

  • Kenya:Court faults penalty for violent robbery

    {The law stipulating the death sentence for robbery with violence is ambiguous, the High Court has ruled.}

    Judges Jessi Lesiit, Luka Kimaru and Stella Mutuku made the declaration Thursday in a suit in which 12 death row convicts had challenged the law that prescribes the death penalty for robbery with violence offenders.

    The judges ruled that sections of the law do not meet the constitutional threshold of setting out precise and distinct differentiating degrees of aggravation of the offence of robbery and attempted robbery to adequately answer to charges as well as prepare a defence.

    They argued that for one to be handed a death sentence, one has to defend oneself after the hearing before the final verdict is made in what is known as mitigation.

    “Death sentence is not a cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment. However, it just cannot be meted to any person convicted of a capital offence,” they said.

    The judges pointed out that it was necessary for the mitigating circumstances to be considered so as to ensure the accused person’s right is not violated in anyway and that there is a fair trial.

    “If the court does not receive and consider mitigating factors and other statutory pre-sentencing requirements, it is not mandatory for the courts to pass a death sentence against persons charged with capital offences,” they ruled.

    In Kenya, offences with a death penalty, include robbery with violence and murder.

    While noting that the verdict would consequently mean that several robbery with violence convicts would have to be set free, the judges temporarily suspended the decision for 18 months to enable the Attorney-General, the Kenya Law Reform and other relevant agencies to appropriately amend the impugned sections.

    The court asked Parliament to take into consideration international good practices on sentencing so as to accord similar facts to similar charges of equal gravity.

    But for those on death row after being convicted with the disputed sections of the law, the judges ruled that the AG with relevant authorities should find a remedy for the prejudice suffered and prescribe an appropriate solution in the same time frame.

    Even though the verdict was in favour of the 12 filed the objection in 2013, after being handed the death sentence, the judges declined to grant a request to have their convictions looked again by the trial court.

    They were all separately charged with offences of robbery with violence and attempted robbery.

    With their petition, which challenged the death penalty as contrary to Bill of Rights, human rights and a right to a fair hearing, they first appeared before Justice Mohamed Warsame (now a Court of Appeal judge), who dismissed their suit.

    The appellate court referred them back to the High Court to be heard on merit by a three- judge bench.

    High Court Judge Isaac Lenaola delivers judgement on March 16, 2015. Three High Court judges have questioned death penalty regarding robbery with violence.
  • Bring our bosses to court as well, they gave us the orders- Police officers in Besigye scandal

    {Former Kampala Metropolitan South Regional police commander has said the police high command directed them to use batons on the eve of President Museveni swearing in.}

    Mr Andrew Kaggwa yesterday told police court that the strategic management of the police on May 11 directed them to use batons to disperse opposition crowds that were expected to disrupt the fifth swearing ceremony of Mr Museveni at Kololo Independence Grounds.

    Mr Kaggwa said while presenting his defense submission on the three counts slapped on nine police officers and a crime preventer involved in the beating up civilians on July 12 and 13 at Kalerwe Market and Namasole Road respectively.

    Mr Kaggwa said it was inappropriate to charge them with excessive use of force yet they were operating on the directives of police’s highest decision making body.

    “Mr Chairman, it is unfair to charge us with excessive use of force yet we were implementing the directive of the strategic management of the police. The order was given to us on the eve of President Museveni swearing in,” Mr Kaggwa said.

    Mr Dennis Odongpiny, the court Chairman and his colleagues were forced to calm Mr Kaggwa down and inform him that cross examination is part and partial of court process. “Mr Kaggwa, don’t take cross examination to be personal target. It is part of prosecution process. You should respond to questions even if they are asked repeatedly,” Mr Odongpiny said.

    Mr Samuel Bamuzibire, former Kampala Metropolitan Field Force Unit commander, who was equally furious, insisted that the video footage presented by the prosecution witness Mr Fortunate Habyara, the Professional Standards Unit (PSU) commandant, was doctored purposely to sacrifice them for their seniors.

    “I don’t know where the video was picked from. How could we rely on the video which does do not show the whole process. Someone who was not on the ground cannot charge us. We request this court to immediately dismiss the video evidence,” Mr Bamuzibire said.

    Mr Bamuzibire and Mr Kaggwa tasked court to explain why they are the only senior officers being charged yet their seniors like Mr James Ruhweza, former KMP operations commander and Mr Jonathan Baroza, the Personal Assistant to Inspector General of Police, Gen Kale Kayihura were part of the operations.

    “We were not involved in the process of bringing you to this court. Our role is to hear cases brought to us. We don’t know how you were selected,” Mr Herman Owomugisha told Mr Bamuzibire.

    The duo said the batons they used are the current Standard Operations Procedure (SOP) that came into force on May 11. Mr Bamuzibire stunned court when he said the police have several batons such as; big ones from South Africa, long ones from Kenya, short and metallic batons from France.

    L-R Katwe Division Field Operations Commander, Patrick Muhumuza, Wandegeya Division Police Commander, Moses Nanoka, Kampala Metropolitan Police Field Force Commander, Samuel Bamuzibire, and Kampala Metropolitan Police South Commander, Andrew Kaggwa have been charged with use of excessive force to disperse supporters of former FDC presidential candidate, Dr Kizza Besigye, at the Police Disciplinary Court.
  • Maj. Rugomwa remanded

    {Maj. Dr.Aimable Rugomwa accused of manslaughtering Mbarushimana Théogène, has today been remanded for 30 days to deter him from tampering evidence which would stifle investigations. }

    Rugomwa agrees to have beaten Mbarushimana claiming he was defending himself and family since the deceased and others had broken into his home.

    There are witnesses confirming that the death of Mbarushimana resulted from beatings and results from the postmortem indicate that Mbarushimana succumbed to effects of concussions and injuries on the head inflicted on him with a sharp object which broke his skull and damaged his brain.These are considered by the Military court to conclude that Rugomwa has a case to answer.

    Related story: [Maj. Dr. Rugomwa appears in military court over alleged murder ->http://en.igihe.com/justice/maj-dr-rugomwa-appears-in-military-court-over.html]

  • Ebola nurse Pauline Cafferkey ‘not dishonest’, hearing told

    {A Scots nurse who survived Ebola will not face charges of dishonesty at a misconduct hearing.}

    Pauline Cafferkey, 40, was infected while working in Sierra Leone in 2014.

    The Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) is alleging that Ms Cafferkey allowed a wrong temperature to be recorded when she returned to Heathrow and she left a screening area without flagging it up.

    But it said she had no case to answer over dishonesty and that her judgement had been impaired due to illness.

    The panel at the conduct and competence committee agreed to drop charges about “dishonesty” after the NMC agreed that medical evidence clearly showed Ms Cafferkey’s decision-making was impaired due to illness on her return from Sierra Leone.

    This means that the NMC will now make submission on two charges relating to Ms Cafferkey on her return to the UK on 28 December 2014.

    The first alleges that while in a Public Health England screening area, inside Terminal 4 at Heathrow, she allowed an incorrect temperature to be recorded on her screening form.

    The second charge alleges that she left the screening area without reporting her true temperature to medics.

    During Tuesday’s morning session, the panel heard that the screening area at Heathrow airport was “busy, disorganised and even chaotic” when Ms Cafferkey and other medics arrived back from Sierra Leone.

    The agreed facts in the case, as presented to the panel, show that the nurse’s temperature was recorded twice by a doctor at Heathrow at more than 38C. This was in the presence of another person referred to as “registrant A”.

    The doctor claims that “registrant A stated at this point that she would record the temperature as 37.2C on Ms Cafferkey’s screening form and then they would ‘get out of there and sort it out’”.

    The agreed facts show that Ms Cafferkey stated that she recalled the words “let’s get out of here” being used but could not remember who said it or who entered the temperature on her screening form.

    The panel was told that Ms Cafferkey accepted that her temperature had been measured at above 38C yet allowed a reading of 37.2C to be recorded on her screening form, after which she continued to the arrivals area.

    It was heard that a temperature above 37.5C “is an elevated or pyrexial (feverish) temperature that requires further assessment and should be reported to a consultant”.
    ‘Severe viral load’

    Ms Cafferkey admitted taking paracetamol at some point after she realised she had an elevated temperature.

    When she returned to the screening area, the doctor who examined her found her temperature to be normal and cleared the nurse to fly back to Scotland.

    The panel heard that hours later she was diagnosed with one of the most severe viral loads of Ebola ever recorded.

    Doctors said early symptoms would have impaired her judgement and that there was no evidence she had been deliberately dishonest to staff.

    At the hearing, the NMC’s representative said there was no question that Ms Cafferkey and other Ebola doctors were acting for the public good.

    But she said they had to ensure they did not cause any risk to others.

    She said Ms Cafferkey would have understood the importance of temperature checks and the expectation was that a nurse should “fully cooperate” and disclose her symptoms.

    The NMC rep said there were “significant mitigating factors” but the fact Ms Cafferkey did not disclose a symptom of Ebola still “amounts to misconduct”.

    She said Ms Cafferkey was guilty of “unacceptable professional behaviour” by potentially putting the public at risk.

    Pauline Cafferkey’s lawyer, Joyce Cullen, argued that her actions did not amount to misconduct.

    She said the nurse should be viewed as a patient from the moment the first doctor took her temperature.

    She added that Ms Cafferkey “was not acting in a professional capacity” when the incorrect temperature was recorded at Heathrow.

    Ms Cafferkey’s lawyer pointed to past definitions of misconduct as “usually involving” dishonesty.

    She said Ms Cafferkey’s ability to assess her own medical condition and make decisions was likely to have been “substantially impaired”.

    The lawyer said Ms Cafferkey was an Ebola expert with “impeccable record” and it was “so unlikely” that her actions were deliberate.

    She also pointed to the “chaotic” scenes at the Heathrow airport screening process.

    The NMC had originally alleged that Ms Cafferkey “allowed an incorrect temperature to be recorded” on 28 December 2014 and intended to conceal from Public Health England staff that she had a temperature higher than 38C.

    The nurse, from Halfway, Cambuslang, contracted the virus while working as part of a British team at the Kerry Town Ebola treatment centre in 2014.

    She spent almost a month in isolation at the Royal Free at the beginning of 2015 after the virus was detected when she arrived back in the UK.

    Ms Cafferkey was later discharged after apparently making a full recovery, and in March 2015 returned to work as a public health nurse at Blantyre Health Centre in South Lanarkshire.

    In October last year it was discovered that Ebola was still present in her body, with health officials later confirming she had been diagnosed with meningitis caused by the virus.

    However in the months that followed, her health suffered as she had issues with her thyroid, her hair fell out and she had headaches and pains in her joints.

    But Ms Cafferkey stressed that she felt lucky because she had not lost her sight as others had done.

    The hearing was adjourned until Wednesday.

    Pauline Cafferkey leaves the Nursing and Midwifery Council hearing in Edinburgh
  • Kenya:Court issues arrest warrant against OCS over rape case at police station

    {A warrant of arrest has been issued against a top police officer in a station where a woman is said to have been raped.}

    Tigania Resident Magistrate Paul Wechuli issued the warrant against Mulika Officer Commanding Station (OCS) Simon Raziki and Constable Hirbo Siko after they defied summons issued against them on Tuesday.

    Constable Siko is the investigating officer in a case where the woman is accused of malicious damage.

    The two officers were summoned over the rape claims and failure to present police cash bail in court.

    The court Tuesday directed Tigania East police boss Charles Koskey to make the arrests. The case is to be mentioned Wednesday to confirm the arrest.

    Detectives from Tigania East directorate of criminal investigations were also directed to visit the cells where the accused was locked up and present a report before the magistrate Wednesday.

    Raziki and Siko were scheduled to tell the court why they booked a suspect in custody while she had deposited Sh30,000 police cash bail and issued a receipt.

    The OCS was also to shed light over the rape claims and help to identify the officers accused of rape.

    On Thursday, Stella Kinya told Mr Wechuli that officers based at the Mulika Police Station in Tigania Central spiked the milk they served her before raping her.

    Kinya, who had been locked up at the station on Monday last week for malicious damage, said she was later released on police bail pending appearance in court.

    The suspect is accused of destroying a mattress, assorted clothes and three plastic containers worth Sh70,000 belonging to her husband Henry Kaberia Karumpa who reported the matter to police.

    However, the next day when she appeared at the court to plead to the charges, she was told police had not brought her file in court.

    When she went to the station to inquire about the file, she was re-arrested and locked alone in a separate cell.

    ‘DRUGGED AND RAPED’

    Defence lawyer Kennedy Nyamokeri accused police of drugging his client before raping her and failing to present the cash bail in court.

    Mr Nyamokeri said the accused woke up in a police cell and realised she had been sexually assaulted by the officers who gave her a packet of milk laced with sedatives.

    The lawyer had applied that the OCS be summoned in court to identify the rogue officers. He also wanted the officers to explain why they did not present the cash bail that his client deposited at the station.

    “l have information that the OCS is even aware of the heinous act by the officers in the station. This kind of things should not be happening in modern Kenya,” said Mr Nyamokeri.

    After taking plea, Mr Wechuli had to release Kinya on free bond so that she could undergo treatment at the Meru Teaching and Referral Hospital.

    Lawyer Kennedy Nyamokeri at Tigania Law Court on September 8, 2016, where he accused police of locking up his client in the cells and raping her despite paying a police cash bail of Sh30,000.
  • Maj. Dr. Rugomwa appears in military court over alleged murder

    {Maj. Dr.Aimable Rugomwa accused of beating a child, Mbarushimana Théogène, to death has today appeared before the Military Court in Nyamirambo for reading of his case and bail application. }

    He has appeared with his elder brother, Nsanzimfura Mamerito, a civilian resident of Matimba, Nyagatare district, with whom he is co-accused of beating the child to death.

    The judge,Maj.Muhigirwa Gerard read the case to the accused that he, Maj. Dr. Rugomwa and co-accused Nsanzimfura, are alleged to have assaulted and killed Mbarushimana, an accusation which Maj. Dr. Rugomwa denied.

    Nsanzimfura also pleaded not guilty of the accusations saying he, like other residents, had come to see what was happening.

    Maj.Karara Innocent who represented the prosecution told the court that Maj.Rugomwa took Mbarushimana at his home from where he beat him to death after he, Maj. Dr. Rugomwa, took the body outside the fence whereupon he called the village leader claiming to have killed a thief.

    The prosecution stated that the deceased’s postmortem indicated that he was hit with a sharp object on the head suspected to be a knife which broke the skull and affected the brain. His front teeth, prosecution continues, had fallen out with two of his fingers cut off which he said was a clear evidence of how the deceased was defending himself against the sharp object he was being hit with on the head.

    Maj. Rugomwa explained that his home was raided on the night of 3rd September 2016 of which he was informed by his wife and house maids the same night.

    He said that on that Sunday around 9:00pm, a housemaid told his wife that thieves were back, prompting Maj. Dr. Rugomwa to go out but saw no one and returned inside the house.
    Rugomwa explained that he later heard something falling under the avocado tree and saw two people jumping inside the fence. He said he saw Mbarushimana on his car.

    Rugomwa said the two people escaped as he opened the door but caught Mbarushimana who was close to him. He explained that they fought in the small entrance as Mbarushimana sought to escape and kept fighting till he died 15 meters away from the fence.

    Nsanzimfura, his elder brother, said he was not involved in the tragedy since he came like other citizens adding that he knows nothing about what happened in the compound of his brother though he lives in an annexed house.

    Lawyers defending Maj.Dr.Rugomwa said that he was defending his home that had been raided.

    Maj. Dr. Rugomwa applied for bail so that he reports to court from home since he is carrying out a research project aimed at helping women out of barrenness.

    The prosecutor, however, prayed that Maj. Dr. Rugomwa be remanded for 30 days as per article 140 of penal code.

    The court has announced that the ruling of bail application will be will be read tomorrow at 2.00pm.

    Maj. Dr.Aimable Rugomwa in court today
  • Maj. Rugomwa suspected of beating a child to death in court

    {A senior Rwanda Defense Force (RDF) officer, Maj. Dr. Aimable Rugomwa who is suspected of beating a child, Mbarushimana Théogène, to death is today appearing before the military to hear a mention of his case. }

    It is alleged that Maj. Dr. Rugomwa who works at Rwanda Military Hospital is suspected of beating the said child after suspecting him of having carried out a theft.

    He is alleged to have beaten him to death on Sunday 4th September 2016 in Ubumwe village, Rubirizi cell of Kanombe sector in Kicukiro district.

    On Wednesday 7th September 2016, RDF sent a delegation of officers to condole the bereaved family where the RDF spokesperson, Lt Col. René Ngendahimana told the media that the act is heavily condemned.

    “ RDF grossly condemns such acts. Our duty is protecting not killing. Killing people is not our culture. We are responsible for their lives and so we started investigations and held suspects after the incident,” he said.

    Lt Col René Ngendahimana said that what Maj.Dr Aimable Rugomwa and his elder brother did are grave offenses particularly in RDF.

  • Egypt frees human rights activist Ahmad Abdullah on bail

    {Abdullah’s Egyptian Commission for Rights and Freedoms has acted as legal counsel to family of murdered Italian Giulio Regeni.}

    The human rights activist Ahmad Abdullah has been freed after almost 140 days in pre-trial detention in Egypt.

    Abdullah, the head of the board of trustees of the Egyptian Commission for Rights and Freedoms (ECRF), was arrested at his home prior to planned protests against the transfer of two islands to Saudi Arabia on the 25 April. He remains accused of various charges that could still result in him being jailed for life. They include the incitement of violence, calls to overthrow the regime and belonging to a terrorist group.

    Mohammed Lotfy, the executive director of ECRF, said that while Abdullah’s release was a positive development, “it should be followed by dropping all trumped up charges brought against him”. Abdullah is currently out on bail.

    ECRF tracks forced disappearances in Egypt, which have spiked since Abdel-Fatah al-Sisi came to power in 2013. Lawyers connected to ECRF are also acting as the Egyptian legal counsel for the family of murdered Italian Giulio Regeni, whose body bearing signs of torture was found on a desert road outside Cairo in early February.

    Egyptian police ‘investigated’ Giulio Regeni days before his murder
    Read more
    “Solidarity with Ahmad Abdullah … has contributed to his liberation, in particular from the family of Giulio Regeni,” said Lotfy. “ECRF will continue to fight for the truth for Giulio Regeni and in uncovering the fate of Egyptians who fall victim to forced disappearances.”

    Abdullah’s release comes days after Egyptian investigators visited Rome to discuss developments in the Regeni case. Egypt’s prosecutor general, Nabil Sadek, stated following the meeting that police had investigated a tip from the head of the Egyptian street vendors union concerning Regeni over a period of three days in January, in the weeks prior to the 28-year-old’s disappearance.

    Mohammed Abdullah, the head of the union, was later quoted in local media reports as denying that he tipped off the police. Reached by phone by the Guardian, he explained that “Regeni spoke to me about things which I thought were of concern to national security”. Asked what these things were, he repeatedly said “I can’t say”, as the case is currently with the prosecutor’s office.

    Mohammed Abdullah is one of five individuals whose phone records were handed to Italian officials in May this year, part of a requested package of call records and CCTV footage of the area where Regeni disappeared.

    The Italian news agency ANSA reported that the Egyptians presented “the ample, complete and in-depth report on an examination of cellphone traffic covering the areas of [Regeni’s] disappearance [on 25 January] and the discovery of his body” at this latest meeting. Egypt previously termed the request for such records “unconstitutional”.

    The case led to fraught relations between the two nations, with Italy recalling its ambassador to Egypt in April.

    A man holds up a portrait of Giulio Regeni as people stage a sit-in outside Egypt’s embassy in Rome on Friday.
  • Kenya:Court suspends Nkaissery’s move to send Nacada chair Mututho on retirement

    {The High Court has temporarily stopped Interior Cabinet Secretary Joseph Nkaissery from retiring anti-drug abuse agency Nacada’s chairman John Mututho.}

    Justice George Odunga said Mr Mututho had established sufficient grounds to warrant the order to be issued.

    The judge said the order will temporary pending the hearing and determination of the case.

    Mr Mututho had sued on Thursday challenging the decision to retire him via a letter dated September 6.

    {{UNLAWFUL DECISION}}

    Through lawyer George Kithi, he argued that the decision was unlawful since the Cabinet secretary has no powers to sack him because he was appointed by the President after being approved by the National Assembly.

    He also claimed that he had been at the forefront of fighting graft and that it was in bad faith to send him on retirement after he had declined to be transferred to the Transport and Licensing Authority.

    The judge agreed to suspend the decision to retire him.

    The case will be mentioned on October 4 for further directions.

    Nacada chairman John Mututho addresses journalists after opening the Kenya Pharmaceuticals Association's general meeting at Greenhills hotel in Nyeri on May 28, 2016. The High Court has temporarily stopped Interior Cabinet Secretary Joseph Nkaissery from retiring Mr Mututho.
  • Zimbabwe court overturns ban on Harare protests

    {Judge lifts police ban, days after president accused courts of recklessness for allowing rallies that turned violent.}

    Zimbabwe’s High Court has overturned a two-week ban on protests in the capital following a legal challenge from political activists.

    Police banned rallies in Harare and the surrounding district on Thursday, after several violent clashes between police and anti-government protesters in recent weeks.

    But Judge Priscilla Chigumba said on Wednesday that the official police note issued last week was “invalid” and curtailed citizens’ rights.

    “The court has said the ban was unlawful,” lawyer Tendai Bit, a former finance minister who represented the activists, told journalists following the verdict.

    Biti also said that the court had delivered “a brave judgement that asserts the independence” of the judiciary.

    Zimbabwe has seen months of protests against alleged human rights abuses and the deterioration of the economy under President Robert Mugabe, who has ruled the country since 1980.

    Al Jazeera’s Haru Mutasa, reporting from the High Court in Harare, said some protesters were planning to go back to the streets as soon as this week.

    “Their message is that they are unhappy with President Robert Mugabe; they say the economy is being run down, and some even say it’s time for him to go.”

    Earlier this week, Mugabe accused the country’s judiciary courts of being reckless in allowing several anti-government protests that later turned violent.

    “We can’t allow that to continue, (to have) these violent demonstrations unimpeded. No. Enough is enough,” Mugabe said.

    On Friday, a different court denied bail to 58 people arrested during protests on August 26 when riot police fired tear gas, beat up several people and blocked off the site of an opposition demonstration in Harare.

    In the same demonstration, protesters threw stones at police while some set tyres ablaze and pulled down the sign for a street named after Mugabe.

    Zimbabwe has seen months of anti-government protests