Category: Justice

  • Pakistan court: Insufficient evidence to remove Sharif

    {Supreme Court rules there is not enough evidence to order Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s removal over alleged corruption.}

    Pakistan’s Supreme Court has ruled there was insufficient evidence to oust Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif over corruption allegations, but has ordered a high-level investigation into the charges.

    The court issued its verdict on Thursday afternoon in a case based on the “Panama Papers” leaks that was moved by opposition leaders seeking his removal from office.

    “The Supreme Court has decided … the same thing that Nawaz Sharif himself had decided six months ago, when he ordered the formation of a commission to investigate [the allegations],” Khwaja Asif, a senior leader of Sharif’s ruling PML-N party, told reporters outside the courthouse following the announcement.

    Sharif will remain in office during the course of the investigation, which will also focus on his sons Hassan and Hussain, the verdict said.

    According to the verdict, the bench decided the source of the funds in question had still not been conclusively established, and it is this that the joint investigation team it has formed will focus on.

    It was not immediately clear if there were any implications for Sharif’s daughter, Maryam, a prominent leader of his ruling PML-N party.

    The judges ordered that the investigative body should be formed within seven days, and include representatives from the Federal Investigative Agency, the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan, the central bank, and other bodies. It will submit fortnightly reports to the Supreme Court.

    {{Corruption allegations}}

    The allegations focus on Sharif’s previous two terms in office in the 1990s, with opposition politician Imran Khan and others alleging the prime minister and his family illegally profited from his position.

    Security was tight around the capital Islamabad on Thursday morning, with dozens of police officers deputed to secure the government quarter where the Supreme Court is located.

    In 2016, the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) leaked 11.5 million documents from law firm Mossack Fonseca. Included in those documents were letters showing that three of Sharif’s children – Maryam, Hassan and Hussain – were listed as beneficiaries for three companies registered in the British Virgin Islands.

    The documents showed these companies were involved in a 2007 loan of $13.8m, made using high-value Sharif-owned properties in the United Kingdom as collateral, and a separate 2007 transaction amounting to $11.2m.

    Owning off-shore companies is not illegal in Pakistan, but Sharif’s political opponents allege this $25m was gained through corruption during his previous two terms in office as prime minister in the 1990s.

    Sharif contends the money is in his children’s names and he was therefore not obliged to declare the assets on tax and other disclosure documents. Moreover, he claims it was raised through legitimate business deals, mostly based in the Gulf countries.

    Late last year, the Supreme Court took up the case, after months of wrangling between the government and opposition over the formation of a commission to probe the allegations.

    Source:Al Jazeera

  • Tanzanian ‘spies’ get six-month suspended sentence

    {Eight Tanzanians were at last brought back home yesterday from Malawi where a court slapped them a six-month suspended sentence over trespass.}

    Information from the Tanzanian High Commission in Malawi said the Tanzanians who had been detained in a Malawi prison accused of trespassing at a uranium mine, were transported yesterday from Mzuzu in Malawi to the two countries’ Songwe/Kasumulu border.

    On Wednesday this week, Mzuzu Chief Resident Magistrate Texious Masoamphambe sentenced the eight to one-month imprisonment on criminal trespass and three months imprisonment for conducting reconnaissance.

    But, Chief Resident Magistrate Masoamphambe suspended the sentences ‘for six months’ rescuing the Tanzanians from the jail term.

    “The Tanzanians are not to commit any crime in the stated period of suspended sentence,” said Masoamphambe in his ruling. The magistrate said the Tanzanians had shown remorse after conviction and have been in custody since they were arrested on December 20, last year, around Kayuni Village at Karonga in Malawi.

    They include WalasaMwasangu (30), Binto Materinus (32), AshuraYasiri (63), Christian Msoli (38), Layinali Kumba (47), Maliyu Mkobe, Gilbert Mahumdi (32) and Martin Jodomusole (25).

    The court in Malawi further directed the Ministry of Home Affairs and Internal Security to issue removal directives to return the convicts in Tanzania.

    The government of Tanzania had been pursuing diplomatic procedures with its Malawian counterpart to secure the release of the team from remand custody in the country over criminal trespass charges.

    Source:Daily News

  • Houthi court sentences Yemeni journalist to death

    {Yemeni journalist has been accused by the Houthis of collaborating with an ‘enemy state’.}

    A Yemeni journalist has been sentenced to death by a Houthi court, which accused him of collaborating with enemy states, activists have said.

    Yahya Abduraqeeb al-Jubaihi was kidnapped by Yemen’s Houthi rebels from his home in September 2016 and was forcibly disappeared.

    This is the first time a journalist has been sentenced to death in Yemen.

    The court accused Jubaihi of helping rival President Abd-Rabbu Mansour Hadi’s government of conducting killings and attacks in Houthi-led areas.

    Hooria Mashhour, Yemen’s former minister for human rights, wrote on Twitter “We have to stand against this farce trial”.

    Jubaihi is among at least 36 activists currently being tried by a Houthi court in Sanaa.

    The Yemeni Journalists Syndicate issued a statement condemning the death sentence of Jubaihi, calling the sentence “heinous” and “unconstitutional”.

    It demanded the immediate release of Jubaihi and all other activists held by the Houthis.

    Baraa Shiban, a caseworker with Reprieve UK, an international human rights organisation, wrote about the trial on Twitter, saying that the mothers of those on trial protested outside the prison but were attacked by the Houthis.

    11. Activists’ mothers protested next day in front of Yemeni intelligence prison but were attacked and chased by Houthi armed men

    Among activists who are being prosecuted by the Houthis are journalists, professors, researchers and teachers.

    5. A professor during trial said they were tortured, finger nails being pulled out, humiliation… judge considered information irrelevant

    A video being shared online shows the Houthi trial in Sanaa of the activists who have been forcefully disappeared since 2015.

    On December 20, 2016, Mohammed al-Abbsi, another Yemeni journalist, died in hospital, reportedly from a heart attack.

    {{Where are journalists under attack?}}

    An autopsy was performed at the direction of his family, and the results, which were released on February 5, 2017, confirmed that he was killed by exposure to a toxic gas.

    In 2014, Houthi fighters overran Yemen’s capital Sanaa and forced the Saudi-backed government of President Hadi to flee into exile.

    An Arab coalition was assembled by Saudi Arabia in 2015 to fight the Houthis and troops loyal to former President Ali Abdullah Saleh .

    According to UN figures , the nearly two-year conflict has killed at least 10,000 people and wounded 40,000.

    Source:Al Jazeera

  • Kenya:10 men sentenced to death for killing Elkana Syong’oh

    {What started as an alarm by some villagers that cattle thieves had been spotted in Mwanche village in Migori County led to the lynching of three innocent men by a mob on the night of August 12, 2013.}

    And now, almost four years later, a court has ruled that 10 men who were part of the mob be sent to the hangman for murder.

    The events of that dark night claimed the lives of Elkana Gondi Syong’oh, a chief accountant in the Department of Defence, his driver Moses Magiri Amek and his farmhand Simon Gombe.

    The three were seen at 8pm that night, mistaken for cattle rustlers and beaten up before they were set ablaze in Mr Syongoh’s vehicle.

    Two were burnt beyond recognition.

    {{Brutal deaths }}

    Twelve people were arrested and charged following the attack. Two absconded trial and the rest were found to have played a role in the brutal killings.

    David Ochieng Ajwang, Nicholas Otunga Otieno, Daniel Owino Oganyo, Julius Makambo Obade, Kennedy Kisa Omweri, Julius Otieno Deya, Janes Ogalo Oketch Olendo, Joseph Odhiambo Majiwa, Joseph Keya Omweri and Paul Koi Odeko killed the three innocent men.

    Some of the suspects were found with items stolen from the slain men, according to a judgement by Justice David Majanja.

    The judgement was delivered in Migori on April 5 and published by the Kenya Law Reports on Tuesday.

    The verdict brings to a close a case that arose from the cruel killing of three innocent men, including Mr Syong’oh, an industrious farmer who had travelled to the area to buy quail.

    Justice Majanja, after considering the evidence of 23 witnesses, concluded that there was no doubt that the 10 were at the scene of the incident and that they took part in the killings.

    {{Cut hand }}

    “The savage way the accused inflicted the injuries on the deceased leave no doubt that they were inflicted with intent to cause grievous harm or death,” the judge states.

    Ajwang, for instance, was seen cutting the left hand of the driver with a panga.

    “The driver nevertheless continued driving until he stopped the car at the junction of the main road headed to Migori.

    “After the car stopped, Joseph Odhiambo began pulling the driver and passengers out of car with the help of Nicholas Otunga,” states Justice Majanja in his judgement.

    The court was told that Paul Koi was spotted by villagers tying up Mr Syongoh’s farmhand with a rope before dragging him to the scene, where the others were being beaten. The farmhand had tried to escape from the scene.

    Ajwang was also seen striking Mr Syong’oh on the back with a panga.

    {{Gruesome killings }}

    Moreover, Keya was found with two jackets stolen from the slain men days after the gruesome killings. A Chloride Exide battery that had been stolen from Mr Syong’oh’s car was also found in the home of Kennedy Kisa.

    Nerbert Lubanga, the man who had sold quail to Mr Syong’oh and his two companions before they drove off only to be accosted by villagers shortly afterwards, told the court that he had escorted the men to their car and returned home.

    Mr Lubanga testified that when he tried to go to the scene where the three had been waylaid to tell the residents that they were not thieves, he was beaten up.

    “As someone was trying to force him to sit down, another person pushed him and he fell and rolled into the nearby bushes whereupon he fled the scene,” Justice Majanja wrote of Mr Lubanga’s testimony.

    Police investigated the killings and arrested several suspects. The case opened at the High Court in Kisii before being transferred to Migori.

    Because the events happened at night, the accused argued in court that no one could recognise them and pin them down as the perpetrators.

    But Justice Majanja thought otherwise.

    “The witnesses and accused knew each other as they were from the same village. During the incident, the witnesses had the opportunity to interact with the accused closely because they knew each other,” said the judge.

    The burnt-out vehicle belonging to Department of Defence employee Elkana Syong’oh, who was killed by a mob in Migori after being mistaken for a cattle rustler. He was lynched alongside his driver and farmhand on August 13, 2013.

    Source:Daily Nation

  • Tanzania:Magistrate in court over bribe

    {A magistrate with Kyaka Primary Court in Misenyi District, Nelson Bagenda (29), yesterday morning appeared before the Bukoba Resident Magistrate’s Court for allegedly soliciting for a 20,000/- bribe.}

    A prosecutor from the Prevention and Combatting of Corruption Bureau (PCCB), Fortunatus Mpangamila, alleged before Resident Magistrate Aloys Katemana, that on November 30, 2015 the accused (Bagenda), together with second accused, Dezideri Benedict (46), a Court Assessor at Kyaka, jointly solicited for 20,000/- bribe.

    According to Mpangamila, the accused demanded and received 20,000/- from the two accused persons, who had a pending criminal case to allow them get bail. Testifying in court, Flavian Kowero, who is a Senior Official from PCCB, told the court that the matter was reported by Herman Karemire and they (PCCB) laid a trap and arrested Bagenda and Benedict.

    Both the accused pleaded not guilty to the charge and were released on a 2m/- bail with two sureties. The Criminal Case No RM CC 13/2017 was adjourned until April 18, this year, for further hearing.

    Meanwhile, Jovitha Edward (25), from Kashai Ward in Bukoba Municipality appeared before Resident Magistrate Joanitha Rwehabura, facing a charge of using abusive language to induce another male to commit sodomy.

    Prosecuting, State Attorney Emmanuel Mavere, alleged before the court that the accused committed the offence between February 27 and March 31, this year, at the Bukoba Bus Stand.

    The accused pleaded not guilty to the charge and he was released on 700,000/- bail with two sureties. Preliminary hearing is expected to start on April 13, this year

    Source:Daily News

  • Pretoria court halts extradition of DRC ‘prophet’

    {The religious leader is a vocal opponent of Joseph Kabila’s and stands to be persecuted at home.}

    The High Court in Pretoria has granted asylum to a religious leader from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and ordered that proceedings to extradite him for a murder charge in his home country be put on hold.

    Paul Mukungubila, 69, who heads the Ministry for the Restoration from Black Africa and is an opponent of President Joseph Kabila, turned to the court after the Refugee Appeal Board refused to hear his appeal against the refusal of his asylum application, because there were extradition proceedings pending against him.

    Five of Makungubila’s 18 wives and 12 of his 19 children currently reside with him in South Africa.

    He fled to the country in 2014, saying he feared he faced the same fate as other adherents of his faith who have been mercilessly murdered and senselessly imprisoned.

    Makungubila is regarded by the 1 200 members of his organisation as a prophet with revelatory powers about the future.

    He was arrested by Interpol in 2015, in connection with charges of murder, aggravated assault, malicious destruction and arbitrary and illegal detention, whereafter SA authorities, acting on a request by the DRC government, started proceedings to extradite him.

    Makungubila denied responsibility for the charges and said he and members of his religious group were engaged in a peaceful demonstration and were unarmed when they were savagely set upon by DRC security forces.

    He said he had been the victim of Kabila and his government on several occasions and was, in 2006, when he contested the presidential election, also set upon by commandos sent by Kabila.

    Judge MJ Maluleke said it was clear that Makungubila would be subjected to persecution on account of his religion and political opinions.

    Traditional healer accessories

    Source:The Citizen

  • Rwanda prosecutors to attend Murekezi extradition case in Malawi court

    {The government of Malawi has said that Rwandese Prosecution Agencies have confirmed their participation and attendance at the extradition hearing of Rwandan fugitive and genocide convict Vincent Murekezi which is making a comeback in Malawian court after it was initially dismissed.}

    The case is making a comeback in the Malawian courts as Rwanda and the rest of the world commemorates the 1994 genocide against Tutsi and following the signing of an Extradition Treaty between Malawi and Rwanda on February 25, 2017.

    Human Rights Consultative Committee Robert Mkwezalamba earlier last month wondered why the Minister of Home Affairs, who under the laws of Malawi, has the legal obligation to simply sign for his extradition has not yet done so.

    A group calling themselves Concerned Citizens also petitioned the Minister to simply exercise her power as given by the law to have Murekezi extradited, a development which has met deaf ears from the minister responsible.

    The Rwandan fugitive, Murekezi is wanted for genocide and crimes against humanity for the role he played in the 1994 genocide against Tutsi which saw more than one million Tutsis murdered.

    Senior Chief State Advocate Steven Kayuni disclosed in an interview that officials from Rwandan National Prosecution Authority have confirmed their participation and attendance at the hearing.

    “The court has set April 10, 2017 as the date when it will start hearing the case. If you remember the court ruling was that officials from Rwanda should come and attend the hearing. So after making the fresh application, we notified our friends in Rwanda,” said Kayuni.

    He said the Rwandese officials are finalizing paperwork and travel arrangements before flying into the country to attend the extradition case.

    The Lilongwe Principal Resident Magistrate Court had initially dismissed the case because of irregularities in the manner in which the State presented the case in court.

    However, Principal Resident Magistrate Patrick Chirwa gave the State liberty to re-apply for his extradition after regularizing the process.

    “They {Rwandan prosecution officials} needed enough time to prepare; hence, we requested for a shift in dates,” explained Kayuni.

    But he could not commit himself on the actual date the prosecution officials from Rwanda would be jetting in.

    The lead defense lawyer for Murekezi, Wapona Kita said he was not aware of the development.

    However, lawyer Gift Kayuni told the media outside the court in one of the appearances that they would be glad to have the Rwandan prosecution witnesses physically present in the court.

    He emphasized that this is a requirement of the law.

    In reaction, the Rwandan National Prosecutor Faustin Nkusi said they were ‘ready to explain any concern they have, whether concerning our laws in Rwanda, fair trial issues and other concerns.’

    Nkusi said the National Public Prosecution Authority of Rwanda is ready to appear in court and defend its extradition request as friends of court “amicus curiae”.

    Most commentators and human rights defenders are requesting the government of Malawi to hasten the extradition of Murekezi as this a threat to national security.

    Human Rights Consultative Committee Chairperson Robert Mkwezalamba told the media that he doesn’t see why the government is dragging its feet on extraditing Murekezi when the laws of Malawi are clear on giving the legal obligation to the Minister of Home Affairs to have culprits like Murekezi extradited.

    Murekezi being led to a waiting police van. / Watipaso Mzungu

    Source:Nyasa Times

  • Tanzania:Ivory case suspect was not tortured, witness tells court

    {Two witnesses have confirmed before a Dar es Salaam court that Manase Philemon (39), who is accused of leading organized crime and unlawful dealing in government trophies worth 5.4bn/-, was not tortured while making his statement.}

    Philemon who is charged alongside the alleged Queen of Ivory, Chinese Yang Feng Clan (66) and Salivius Matembo (39) had claimed to have been tortured by the police to agree to the charges.

    Before Kisutu Principal Resident Magistrate, Huruma Shaidi, the prosecutor, Mr Faraja Nchimbi, informed the court that the case had come for trial within a trial.

    A police officer, Sergeant D 7847 Beatus (46), alleged that he had taken Philemon’s statement at Kijitonyama Police Station after his arrest at Njiapanda Segerea and held at Stakishari Station before being transferred. Sergeant Beatus told the court that before taking the statement, he notified his superiors and went through with the interrogation.

    He further claimed that at that moment, the accused was in good shape and was accorded all rights before beginning the interrogation. “I informed him of his right to speak before a lawyer or a relative but he had agreed for us to proceed with neither the persons and upon finishing, he placed his signature and confirmation on the sheet,” alleged Sargent Beatus.

    Sergeant Beatus also notified the court that he had received a call from the then Director of Criminal Investigation (DCI), Mngulu, ordering him to go to Stakishari Station to transfer a suspect who was involved in an illegal business of elephant tusks.

    “The interrogation went on from around 4.05pm to 5.28pm in the evening before handing the accused to the head of the station to place him under custody,” alleged the witness.

    He also denied to having guarded the accused in a Hospital at Sinza where Philemon claimed to have been admitted after being tortured. Responding to a question which was asked by Defence Attorney, Nehemiah Nkoko, Sergeant Beatus said there was no time he had heard that the accused was admitted to a hospital but rather heard of him being sick but he has never guarded him.

    Another witness, Corporal F 29 Lugano (36), notified the court that he was the one who carried out Philemon’s arrest and handed him over to Sergeant Beatus and he had not complained of any illness or injuries.

    “The arrest was carried out on April 18, 2014, when he was tipped off by an informer on the whereabouts of the accused,” he said. The prosecution alleges that between January 1, 2000 and May 22, 2014 in the city, all the three accused carried out business of the said government trophies.

    It is alleged that the trio bought and sold 706 pieces of elephant tusks weighing 1,889 kilogrammes valued at 5,435,865,000/-, the property of United Republic of Tanzania, without a permit from the director of wildlife.

    The prosecution alleged that within the same period and place, intentionally, Clan organized, managed and financed a criminal racket by collecting, transporting or exporting and selling elephant tusks without a permit from the director of wildlife or CITES permit.

    Within the same period and place, Matembo and Philemon allegedly furnished assistance and directions in the conduct of business of collecting, transporting and selling the said government trophies with intent to reap benefits, promote and further the objective of criminal racket. Philemon is facing a separate count of escaping from lawful custody.

    Source:Daily News

  • Niger court action over ‘fraudulent’ uranium deal

    {Activists in Niger have started legal action into a uranium deal in which the country is said to have lost $3.25m.}

    The scandal, known as “uranium-gate”, resulted from a 2011 transaction between French nuclear giant Areva and companies both in Niger and abroad.

    There is also a French investigation into some of Areva’s business dealings, with aspects related to this deal.

    Areva has not commented on the legal case in Niger, but says it is cooperating in the French enquiry.

    Niger is one of the biggest uranium producers in the world and the metal is the country’s largest export.

    Many people turned up on Friday morning outside the court in the capital, Niamey, as representatives of civil society movements arrived to register the court action, the BBC’s Himadou Hamadou said.

    Their complaint alleges embezzlement of public funds, money laundering, forgery and conspiracy to defraud.

    The legal action centres on the allegation that Areva in 2011 bought a stock of uranium from Niger at a discounted price.

    Niger has two significant uranium mines that provides 7.5% of the world mining output from Africa’s highest-grade uranium ores, according to the World Nuclear Association, the international organisation that represents the global nuclear industry.

    Niger’s first commercial uranium mine began operating in 1971, with a strong government support for expanding uranium mining.

    Students and civil society activists in Niger believe they do not get a fair share from their country's uranium trade

    Source:BBC

  • Syria: Kurdish YPG fighters dominate Turkey-US talks

    {‘A number of options’ for Raqqa military operation in Syria, but no agreement reached between Turks and Americans.}

    The United States and Turkey struggled on Thursday to resolve a deep dispute over the Kurdish role in the fight against Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), as US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson wrapped up his first trip to Turkey.

    As the US prepares an operation to retake the de facto ISIL capital of Raqqa in Syria, the Turks and Americans are deadlocked over who should do the fighting.

    Turkey wants the US to partner with its military and Turkish-backed forces in Syria. But Washington has been backing Syrian Kurdish fighters who have proven the most effective ground force against ISIL.

    “Let me be very frank: These are not easy decisions,” Tillerson said in Ankara. “They are difficult decisions that have to be made.”

    Turkey considers the Kurdish force, known as the YPG, to be a “terrorist group” that threatens Turkey’s security.

    The US hasn’t formally announced a decision on who will be part of the Raqqa operation. But all signs point to Washington continuing to bet on the Kurds. In recent days, the US military airlifted hundreds of Syrian Kurdish forces along with US military advisers and artillery behind enemy lines in preparation for the Raqqa offensive.

    Tillerson said he and Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu had explored “a number of options and alternatives” for the operation, but signaled they’d reached no agreement.

    Cavusoglu, standing alongside Tillerson, warned past US support for Syrian Kurdish forces had already damaged America’s relations with Turkey. He accused the US of using one “terrorist organisation” to fight another.

    “It has negatively affected the Turkish people’s sentiments toward the United States,” Cavusoglu said in Turkish.

    John McCain warns of ‘tough decisions’ on Syrian Kurds

    Cavusoglu claimed the Trump administration and the US military have accepted that the YPG – the dominant force in the US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces – is intrinsically linked to the PKK, or Kurdistan Workers’ Party.

    The PKK has led a three-decade long insurgency in southeast Turkey and is considered a “terrorist group” by the US. But the US has not extended that designation to the Kurds in Syria, and American military officials have said there’s no evidence the YPG has posed a threat to Turkey in recent years.

    “The US military accepts that there is no distinction between the PKK, which is a terrorist organisation, and the YPG. However, the previous administration failed to acknowledge that,” said Cavusoglu, referring to Barack Obama’s government.

    “We have repeatedly expressed that it is a mistake to consider cooperation with a terrorist organisation in the guise of the YPG, and in the long term that would be a mistake in Syria.”

    Though the US and Turkey share a goal of defeating ISIL in Iraq and Syria, the US has been concerned that Turkey’s Operation Euphrates Shield is more focused on preventing Syrian Kurds from forming an autonomous region in northern Syria, along Turkey’s border, that could embolden Turkey’s own Kurdish minority.

    On Wednesday, Turkish Prime Minister Binali Yildirim announced the operation had ended after its troops and allied rebels secured territory along the border between Turkey and Syria.

    “Life is back to normal. Everything is under control,” Yildirim said on Turkey’s NTV news channel.

    “Euphrates Shield has ended. If there is a need, a new operation will have a new name.”

    Mevlut Cavusoglu, right, shakes hands with Rex Tillerson on Thursday

    Source:Al Jazeera