Category: Health

  • One in 10 children has ‘Aids defence’

    {A 10th of children have a “monkey-like” immune system that stops them developing Aids, a study suggests.}

    The study, in Science Translational Medicine, found the children’s immune systems were “keeping calm”, which prevented them being wiped out.

    An untreated HIV infection will kill 60% of children within two and a half years, but the equivalent infection in monkeys is not fatal.

    The findings could lead to new immune-based therapies for HIV infection.

    The virus eventually wipes out the immune system, leaving the body vulnerable to other infections, what is known as acquired human immunodeficiency syndrome (Aids).

    The researchers analysed the blood of 170 children from South Africa who had HIV, had never had antiretroviral therapy and yet had not developed Aids.

    Tests showed they had tens of thousands of human immunodeficiency viruses in every millilitre of their blood.

    This would normally send their immune system into overdrive, trying to fight the infection, or simply make them seriously ill, but neither had happened.

    {{Keep calm and carry on}}

    Prof Philip Goulder, one of the researchers from the University of Oxford, told the BBC: “Essentially, their immune system is ignoring the virus as far as possible.

    “Waging war against the virus is in most cases the wrong thing to do.”
    Counter-intuitively, not attacking the virus seems to save the immune system.

    HIV kills white blood cells – the warriors of the immune system.

    And when the body’s defences go into overdrive, even more of them can be killed by chronic levels of inflammation.

    Prof Goulder said: “One of the things that comes out of this study is that HIV disease is not so much to do with HIV, but with the immune response to it.”

    For scientists, the way the 10% of children cope with the virus has striking similarities to the way more than 40 non-human primate species cope with simian immunodeficiency virus or SIV.

    They have had hundreds of thousands of years to evolve ways to tackle the infection.
    “Natural selection has worked in these cases, and the mechanism is very similar to the one in these kids that don’t progress,” Prof Goulder said.

    {{War or peace?}}

    This defence against Aids is almost unique to children.

    Adult humans’ immune systems tend to go all-out to finish off the virus in a campaign that nearly always ends in failure.

    Children have a relatively tolerant immune system, which becomes more aggressive in adulthood – chickenpox, for example, is far more severe in adults due to the way the immune system reacts.

    But this does mean that as the protected children age and their immune system matures, there is a risk of them developing Aids.

    Some do, some remain Aids-free.

    Dr Ann Chahroudi and Dr Guido Silvestri, from Emory University in the US, said the study may have found the “very earliest signs of coevolution of HIV in humans”.

    In a commentary, they added: “It is not known whether it would be clinically safe for these newly identified HIV infected paediatric non-progressors to remain off-therapy.

    “This assessment is further complicated by the fact that prevention of HIV transmission to sexual partners becomes relevant in adolescence.”

    People with HIV can have normal life-expectancy if they have access to antiretroviral drugs.

    But their super-heated immune system never returns to normal, and they face greater risks of cardiovascular disease, cancer and dementia.

    Prof Goulder believes these findings in children could ultimately help rebalance the immune system in all HIV patients.

    He told the BBC: “We may be identifying an entirely new pathway by studying kids that in the longer term could be translated to new treatments for all HIV infected people.”

  • Breastfeeding good for mothers too

    {We have all been made to believe that breastfeeding is good for a young baby, but according to researchers from Harvard Medical School and the Cambridge Health Alliance, breastfeeding is not only good for children, but also for their mothers, providing more health benefits and preventing more maternal diseases than previously known.}

    According to a new study published online in Maternal & Child Nutrition, breastfeeding for a total of one year and exclusively for six months — could protect babies and their mums from premature death.

    According to the study’s lead author Dr. Melissa Bartick, assistant professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and the Cambridge Health Alliance: “Breastfeeding is far more beneficial in preventing disease and reducing costs than previously estimated,”

    “The results should compel all hospitals to develop programs aimed at helping new moms learn to breastfeed their babies.”

    To conduct the study, the researchers modelled two groups. One was an “optimal” group, in which the majority of moms breastfed as recommended. That group was compared with a “suboptimal” group, in which moms breastfed at current rates in the US, which are less than the recommended guidelines. Using existing research and government data, they projected the rates and costs of diseases that breastfeeding is known to reduce, along with the rates and costs of early deaths from those diseases.

    Children’s diseases included in the evaluation were acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, ear infections, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, gastrointestinal infections, lower respiratory tract infections, obesity, necrotizing enterocolitis and SIDS. For mothers, the study included breast cancer, pre-menopausal ovarian cancer, diabetes, hypertension and heart attacks.

  • 7 causes of urinary tract infection

    {The urinary tract is a system in the body responsible for removing waste and excess water. The urinary tract consists of the bladder, the kidneys, the ureters and the urethra.}

    Urinary tract infections are caused by microbes such as bacteria overcoming the body’s defences in the urinary tract.

    Common symptoms of urinary tract infections include a strong, frequent urge to urinate and a painful and burning sensation when urinating.

    Below are 7 causes of urinary tract infection

    1. Holding pee for too long can cause urinary tract infections because when urine stays too long in the bladder, it encourages the production of germs.

    2. Wiping from back to front after a bowel movement can cause urinary tract infection. Wiping from back to front causes germs to the enter the vagina.

    3. Sexual intercourse can cause urinary tract infections as it pushes germs inside the urethra. Ensure you and your partner are always clean.

    4. Urinary tract infections can also be caused by kidney stones because kidney stones make it difficult to pass urine.

    5. Use of spermicides and tampons can cause urinary tract infections.

    6. Poor personal hygiene can cause urinary tract infections.

    7. Diabetes can increase the likelihood of having urinary tract infections.

  • How baby’s genes influence birth weight and later life disease

    {New research finds genetic differences that help to explain why some babies are born bigger or smaller than others. It also reveals how genetic differences provide an important link between an individual’s early growth and their chances of developing conditions such as type 2 diabetes or heart disease in later life.}

    The large-scale study, published in Nature, could help to target new ways of preventing and treating these diseases.

    The new study was jointly led by a team of researchers from six institutions including the universities of Exeter, Oxford, Bristol, Cambridge and Queensland, and the Erasmus Medical Centre in Rotterdam. The research involved more than 160 international researchers from 17 countries who are members of the Early Growth Genetics (EGG) Consortium. The work was supported by more than 120 research funders: the major sources of funding for UK researchers were the Wellcome Trust, the Royal Society, the Medical Research Council, the National Institute for Health Research and the European Union.

    The research concluded that a substantial proportion (at least one-sixth) of the variation in birth weight is down to genetic differences between babies. This is seven to eight times more variation than can be explained by environmental factors already known to influence birthweight, such as the mother smoking during pregnancy or her body mass index (a measure of obesity) before pregnancy starts.

    Dr Rachel Freathy, a Sir Henry Dale Fellow at the University of Exeter Medical School, who was joint lead author on the study, said: “This study has revealed how the small genetic differences between individuals can collectively have quite large effects on birth weight, and how those same genetic differences are often linked to poor health in later life. Weight at birth is influenced by many factors, including the baby’s genes and those of its parents, as well as by the nutrition made available and the environment provided by the mother. We now have a much more detailed view of the ways in which these genetic and environmental elements work together to influence early growth and later disease.”

    It has been known for some time that babies whose birthweight is well below, or well above, average have a markedly increased risk of diabetes many decades later. Until now, many researchers have assumed that this link reflects the long-term impact of the nutritional environment in which the fetus develops: in other words, that events in early life can “set up” an individual’s body in ways that make them more prone to disease in later life.

    In this new study, the researchers uncovered a substantial overlap in the genetic regions linked to differences in birth weight and those that are connected to a higher risk of developing diabetes or heart disease. Most of this overlap involves the baby’s genetic profile, but the team found that the mother’s genes also played an important role in influencing her baby’s birth weight, most likely through the ways in which they alter the baby’s environment during pregnancy.

    Professor Mark McCarthy at the University of Oxford, and co-lead author, said: “These findings provide vital clues to the some of the processes that act over decades of life to influence an individual’s chances of developing diabetes and heart disease. These should highlight new approaches to treatment and prevention. Understanding the contributions of all of these processes will also tell us how much we should expect the many, wonderful improvements in antenatal care to reduce the burden of future diabetes and heart disease.”

    The researchers analysed genetic differences throughout the genomes of nearly 154,000 people from across the world. Around half of these came from the UK Biobank cohort. By matching the genetic profiles of these people to information on birth weight, the researchers could identify sixty regions of the genome that were clearly driving differences in birthweight. They then analysed data from previous studies on conditions including diabetes and heart disease, and found that many of the same genomic regions were implicated.

    Dr Momoko Horikoshi, from the Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics at the University of Oxford, co-lead author on the paper, continued, “Our results point to the key role played by genetic differences in connecting variation in early growth to future risk of disease. Our next steps will be to gather more pieces of the puzzle, including a better understanding of how the genetic profiles of mother and baby act together to modify the baby’s weight and later disease risk.”

    Dr Rob Beaumont, at the University of Exeter Medical School, who worked on the study, said: “This study highlights the value of large-scale international research collaborations. It’s really satisfying to bring together a wide range of experts to analyse largescale datasets to advance understanding in key areas of human health.”

    Healthy baby (stock image). New research concluded that a substantial proportion (at least one-sixth) of the variation in birth weight is down to genetic differences between babies
  • TB drug designed for children launched in Kenya

    {The world’s first drug specifically designed to treat tuberculosis in children has been launched in Kenya.}

    The new pill is a combination of three drugs used to treat tuberculosis, mixed in the right dosage, and is fruit-flavoured to appeal to children.

    Until now, the global TB Alliance says pills designed for adults have been split to get the dosage for children.

    Every year, about a million children fall ill with TB, which is the world’s deadliest infectious disease.

    In 2014, an estimated 140,000 children died of TB, according to global figures from the World Health Organization (WHO).

    Kenya is the first country to roll out the new drug nationally, with more countries expected to follow over the next three years.

    Experts say the new treatment will be more effective because the components have been measured accurately and the pill is not bitter-tasting.

    What is it like to live in a TB hotspot? Anne Soy, BBC Africa health correspondent:
    At Majengo slum in Kenya’s capital, Nairobi, a dark corridor leads to Helen Chebet’s one-roomed home, where she lives with her family of six.

    The mud-walled building, reinforced with rusty iron sheets, has very few windows and the only source of natural light in the space she rents comes from a tiny transparent panel installed in the roof.

    Living conditions like these, crowded and with poor ventilation, are cited as contributing factors to the transmission of tuberculosis.

    This year, both Ms Chebet and her two youngest children were diagnosed with tuberculosis, after several failed attempts to treat for other possible infections. Her 15-month-old daughter Chepkoech was put on a six-month course of antibiotics, which required her to take six tablets a day.

    Ms Chebet tried to hide the drug in the toddler’s food, but her strategy did not work.
    “One particular drug was difficult to split and dissolve in water… I had to grind it,” Ms Chebet says adding that Chepkoech could only stand the bitter-tasting drugs for the first two months.

    The new drug dissolves easily in water, making it easier to take every day for the six-month treatment period.

    “Caregivers can easily give up knowing how difficult it is to give children such medicine,” Kenya’s head of TB programmes Dr Enos Masini told the BBC.

    It is not only Kenya, which begins rolling out the drug for free from 1 October, where TB sufferers are expected to benefit.

    More than 20 countries have expressed interest in introducing the pill, says Dr Cherise Scott from the TB Alliance, the global non-governmental organisation that spearheaded the production of the new drug.

    “The new child-friendly pill will boost survival,” Dr Scott adds.

    Africa has the highest prevalence of TB of any continent.

    The global TB death rate has dropped by almost a half between 1990 and 2015, the WHO says.

    {{Tuberculosis symptoms}}

    A persistent cough, usually for more than three weeks

    Night sweats for weeks or months

    Weight loss

    Fatigue

    High temperature

    Shortness of breath

    The tasty, easy-to-administer drug is expected to significantly help fight TB in children
  • Uganda:600 heart patients miss out on surgery annually

    {The Uganda Heart Institute is seeking for a non-wage budgetary allocation of $7.5million (about Shs25b) in the next financial year if it’s to handle about 1,000 patients in need of either open or closed heart surgeries annually.}

    The Uganda Heart Institute is seeking for a non-wage budgetary allocation of $7.5million (about Shs25b) in the next financial year if it’s to handle about 1,000 patients in need of either open or closed heart surgeries annually.

    With the capacity to conduct 1,000 heart surgeries annually, Dr John Omagino, the director of the institute, told the Daily Monitor in an interview yesterday that the facility is unable to operate on about 600 patients due to lack of enough funds.

    “We have capacity to operate on 1, 000 patients annually but because of the funding challenges, we are able to conduct surgeries on only 400 patients,” Dr Omagino said ahead of the World Heart Day cerebrations due tomorrow.

    “What we are demanding from government is to increase our budget from about Shs6.7b to Shs25b to enable us operate to full capacity,” he said, adding that a single heart operation cost about Shs16m.

    According to Dr Omagino, annually about 16,000 children in Uganda are born with heart defects and need immediate intervention of either open or closed heart surgeries if they are to survive.

    “Our job is to detect all children born with defects and prepare to work on about 8,000, but we manage about 2,000 that come for evaluation,” he said.

    He further added about 60 per cent of the children with heart defects who miss out on operation die before their fifth birthday, and those who live longer spend most time in-and-out of hospital suffering.

    Despite the recently granted autonomy status through the Uganda Heart Institute Act 2016, the cardiothoracic surgeon said the facility is also challenged with space coupled with inadequate number of intensive care units.

    “In our cardiac catheterisation unit, we have capacity to handle about five operations per day but because of space constraints, we only operate on two patients depending on the available beds to hold these patients after coming from theatre,” he adds.

    He hopes that government will soon raise the $65million (about Shs220bn) required for the construction of a new home required to provide adequate space for clinical services, teaching, and accommodation for critical staff and also training fellows.

    Among the adults, Dr Omagino said cardiovascular diseases are on the rise, such as Non-Communicable diseases due to lifestyle and body inactivity.

    “One in every four adults has a raised heart pressure, which is quarter of our adult population and bigger than even HIV/Aids,” he explained.

    600 heart patients miss out on surgery annually
  • 20 facts about your skin you probably didn’t know

    {How much do you think you know about your skin? Do you know your skin is the largest organ in the body?}

    Here are 20 facts about your skin you probably didn’t know

    1. The skin is the largest organ in the body.

    2. The skin accounts for around 15% of your body weight.

    3. There are two types of skins – hairy and glabrous.

    4. Your skin has three layers – the epidermis, dermis and subcutis.

    5. The thinnest skin is found on your eyelids and it’s about 0.02mm thick.

    6. The thickest skin is found on your feet and it’s about 1.4mm deep.

    7. You lose around 20-100 hairs a day.

    8. Hair is made from a protein called keratin.

    9. Over 50% of the dust in your home is actually dead skin.

    10. Every minute, your skin sheds over 30,000 dead cells.

    11. Your skin has its own bacteria microbiome of over 1000 species and around 1,000,000,000,000 individual bacteria.

    12. On average, 14 species of fungi live between your toes.

    13. Your skin colour is the result of a protein called melanin. Large tentacle-like cells called melanocytes produce and distribute melanin.

    14. Around 7% of skin cells are melanocytes.

    15. Everyone has the same number of melanocytes. Skin colour is due to its activity, not quantity.

    16. 1 in 110,000 people have albinism, a lack of melanocytes.

    17. It takes up to 6 months for babies to develop their permanent skin tone.

    18. Melanin is also responsible for eye colour.

    19. Boils are caused by staphylococcal bacteria. It enters through a tiny cut and travels down to the hair follicle.

    20. The glands that produce wax in your ears are specialized sweat glands.

  • 9 surprising items you share but you shouldn’t (almost everyone is guilty of this)

    {People place emphasis on not sharing items like toothbrushes, but it doesn’t end at that, there are other surprising items that we shouldn’t share, and almost everyone is guilty of this.}

    Below are some of those everyday items you should be personal with.

    {{1. Soap }}

    We have that belief that since soap washes itself then it’s okay to share it with someone else. A 2006 study cites soap as a source of continuous re-infection in dental clinics. It’s even been suggested that because soaps doesn’t completely dry after each use, this can cause it to accumulate bacteria and fungi which can be transmitted from person to person.

    {{2. Towel }}

    People also have the misconception that since towels are only used after bathing then it can’t transfer germs. Towels shouldn’t be shared and they should be washed frequently as they can transfer bacteria, germs and even infections.

    {{3. Hair brush }}

    Hair brush is also another everyday item people share without minding. When you share a hairbrush, you are at risk of not just lice but ringworm fungus as well. The ringworm fungus can cause hair irritation, temporary baldness and rashes – it can also affect your scalp.

    {{4. Canned drinks }}

    It’s easy to drink from a can drink used by a friend, but it isn’t totally healthy. Sharing canned drinks can lead to saliva swapping which can result to sore throat, cold and cough, herpes and even meningitis.

    {{5. Makeup }}

    Ladies share their make-ups with each other, but this isn’t really hygienic. Makeups carry a lot of unseen germs from saliva to pink eye and can easily cause one to fall ill. However, makeup is a bit fairer because some make-ups have a number of preservatives that kill bacteria making it safe to share.

    {{6. Hats,helmets and caps }}

    Just as with hair brushes, hats, helmets and caps can also transfer lice and other hair bacteria from person to person.

    {{7. Earphones }}

    It’s so easy to share a pal’s earphone to listen to a quick jam, but it comes with its own risks. Bacteria can transfer from ear to ear when you share earphones and this can lead to ear infections. Ordinarily, you should clean your earphones regularly even if you don’t share them as they accumulate germs and bacteria easily.

    {{8. Earrings }}

    It’s easy to see a lovely piece of earrings and share them, but it isn’t really hygienic. Sharing earrings can transfer bacteria and viruses including hepatitis c. Also when you poke your ear with your earrings, you become susceptible to virus from a previous wearer.

    {{9. Nail clippers }}

    Sharing nail clippers is also not advisable. When there is an opening in your callused skin or when your cuticles are taken too backwards, you become susceptible to virus transfer between you and a previous user.

    Sharing items isn’t as ordinary as you thought they were, so you ought to take your personal hygiene serious.

  • 6 million mosquito nets due in Rwanda

    {The Government of Rwanda is set to distribute 6 million mosquito nets worth Rwf 30 billion as a move to fight against malaria throughout the country. }

    The mosquito net distribution targets were revealed over the weekend by the State Minister in the Ministry of Health, Dr Ndimubanzi Patrick as he joined Ruhango district residents in a special community work.

    “We have placed order of about six million mosquito nets which we will distribute soon. We request you to maintain them for they are expensive and meant to protect your lives and quite expensive, costing $5 each,” he said.

    “You must maintain these mosquito nets well and avoid cutting them for use as sponges or fishing. The government sacrifices a lot to avail mosquito nets to citizens. You have to wash them properly with usual soap and avoid exposing them under the sun,” he advised.

    Dr Ndimubanzi also urged Rwandans to keep away from poor hygiene, cut bushes around homes, dispose broken bottles among other things that can become a breeding ground for mosquitoes.

    He also unveiled a plan of applying insecticides in houses from hottest districts of the country as part of ongoing efforts to fight against Malaria.

    It is expected that two people will share one mosquito net.

    The State Minister in the Ministry of Health, Dr Ndimubanzi Patrick
  • Bath sponges might not be good for your skin

    {A lot of people bath with sponges or loofahs if you may, but it just might not be healthy for you.
    }
    These bathing sponges or loofahs are actually a breeding ground for nasty bacteria which grow and multiply in just one night.

    According to The Sun, Expert J. Matthew Knight, from the Knight Dermatology Institute, says they can do more harm than good.

    The dead skin cells you scrub off gets caught in the folds of these sponges, and could cause a lot of havoc on your skin.

    He added: “Then you put them in this environment in the shower that’s warm and moist and gross, and it’s a set up for bacteria, yeast, and mould to grow in the puff.”

    If you use them on newly shaved skin, the news is even worse.

    The bacteria can then get into any tiny nicks and result in infections and bad skin.

    A study published in the Journal of Clinical Microbiology found these bath sponges host a wide range of bacterial species and bacteria overgrowth literally happens overnight.

    If you feel you cannot do without bathing sponges, scientists say you should rinse the sponge thoroughly after each wash and let it dry away from the moist environment of the shower.

    You should also replace it every three to four weeks but chuck it sooner if it smells musty or you spot any mould.