Category: Health

  • Loneliness triggers Boozing & Overweight

    Loneliness triggers Boozing & Overweight

    {{The emotional problems associated with loneliness have long been acknowledged, but now there is evidence that being lonely has an impact on overall health.

    Researchers found that lonely people are more likely to be heavy drinkers, smokers and overweight.}}

  • Black People at Risk of Heart Diseases

    Black People at Risk of Heart Diseases

    Six out of ten persons of the black race, are more susceptible to heart failures, Dr. Philip Amoo, a Physician Specialist at the Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital in Ghana, has said.

    According to him, persons of the black race are more prone to developing cardiovascular diseases as well as cancers which are usually transmitted through the gene and partly due to poor lifestyle.

    Heart failure means that the heart is not able to pump blood as well as it should.

    Several young persons have had their lives terminated unexpectedly by heart-related diseases in recent times.

    Four risk factors are the strongest predictors of heart failure: high blood pressure (also called hypertension), chronic kidney disease, being overweight, and having low levels of HDL, the “good” cholesterol.

    Most Africans who reportedly develop heart failure, have high blood pressure by age 40, according to research.

    Speaking to local media, Dr. Amoo noted that the situation has become pronounced in in recent times because of failure to give due regard to the risk factors.

    He said: “To have a new hypertension when it’s not in the family or in your gene, you would get it at 60 [which means] you must abuse your body for a long time. But what do we see?”

    “…If our fathers in the village where they are not exposed to these junk foods they hardly ever have these heart attacks, hypertension and so on. Because even though they have the gene that will make them predisposed to all these, the external factor [lifestyle] that must be coupled to it before you’ll have the disease are not there.

    “So if you take Ten Ghanaians from the village somewhere with clean blood pressure…and bring them to Accra, exposed them to the junk food; you wait within Ten years, Six of them would come down with blood pressure,” Dr. Amoo concluded.

    He therefore advised regular checkups particularly for persons of 35 years and above in order not to have their lives abruptly cut by the disease.

    “By the age of 35…checking your blood pressure every year is non-negotiable. Once you are a black [race] make sure that at least yearly you check your blood pressure.

    If you have your mother, your father, [any relative] coming down with hypertension, diabetes then know that you have a higher risk of inheriting the disease and it’s just a matter of time”.

    {Dr. Amoo }

    {myjoyonline}

  • GlaxoSmithKline to Invest US$216M in Africa’s Healthcare Sector

    GlaxoSmithKline to Invest US$216M in Africa’s Healthcare Sector

    Pharmaceutical major GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) is to invest US$216mn in Africa’s healthcare sector.

    The investiment which includes the development of a lab, expansion of manufacturing facilities and training of community healthcare professionals.

    GSK will invest US$41mn in creating the world’s first research and development open lab for non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in Africa, which will improve the understanding of NCD variations in the continent.

    The possible research topics could include the apparent higher prevalence of treatment-resistant hypertension and aggressive breast cancers in young women.

    These insights will help prevent and formulate treatment strategies so scientists and academics can develop new medicines to address the specific needs of African patients, stated the company.

    Andrew Witty, CEO of GSK, said, “Today, we are setting out further steps to tackle Africa’s dual health burden of infectious and emerging non-communicable diseases and help build crucial capacity to underpin the development of the healthcare sector in the region.

    We have a unique opportunity to deliver meaningful social and economic value to all of the communities we work in – using our scientific expertise and our global reach to develop innovative medicines and deliver them to people who need them around the world.”

    The company said that it will also invest US$166mn to expand manufacturing capabilities in Nigeria and Kenya, and build up to five new factories in Rwanda, Ethiopia and Ghana.

    The new facilities will manufacture antibiotics, respiratory and HIV medicines locally. The factories will eventually transfer the technology, skills and knowledge required to manufacture complex products locally. The investments are also poised to create 500 jobs, added GSK.

    In order to reduce the continent’s dependence on imported medicines, steps will be taken to create regional supply hubs and local partnerships will also be established to increase the flow of GSK products and medicines to under-served rural communities, added Witty.

    GSK will also partner with South African-based Aspen Pharmacare to increase the registration of its medicines and vaccines. These steps will also boost efficient supply of products and reduce production costs, stated the company.

    Over the next three years, GSK will partner with charities to train 10,000 community healthcare workers in Kenya, Ghana and Nigeria under the UN-based initiative One Million Health Worker campaign.

    {africanreview}

  • Can you Die of a Broken Heart?

    Can you Die of a Broken Heart?

    {{In 1986, a 44-year-old woman was admitted to Massachusetts General Hospital. She felt fine all day, but in the afternoon she developed extreme crushing pain in her chest, radiating through her left arm. }}

    It’s a classic sign of a heart attack, but the puzzling thing was that she didn’t suffer from coronary heart disesase. There was no life-threatening clot in the arteries surrounding the heart.

    It looked, from the outside, like a heart attack, but it wasn’t. Describing the unusual case in the New England Journal of Medicine, Thomas Ryan, and John Fallon suggest the apparent damage to the heart muscle was emotional rather than physiological. Earlier that day, she had been informed that her 17-year-old son had committed suicide.

    Could the woman have suffered from a broken heart? The answer, it turned out, was already hiding in plain sight. The Massachusetts case was surprising to doctors – but it wasn’t news to everybody.

    For many years, doctors scorned the idea of a relationship between psychology and physiology. In their book Zoobiquity, Kathryn Bowers and Barbara Natterson-Horowitz described this attitude: “Among many physicians, the idea that emotions could cause actual physical events within the architecture of the heart was viewed with nearly the same sideways glance as an interest in healing crystals or homeopathy.

    Real cardiologists concentrated on real problems you could see: arterial plaque, embolising blood clots, and rupturing aortas. Sensitivity was for psychiatrists.”

    Despite this, the evidence that extreme emotions can impact the heart goes back decades – only not among humans. It was wildlife biologists and veterinarians who first noticed that extreme emotions can wreak havoc on body physiology.

    By the mid-20th Century, they noticed that a curious thing happens when an animal experiences a sudden jolt of life-or-death fear. When it’s caught by an advancing predator, adrenaline fills the bloodstream to such an extent that the blood almost becomes like a poison, damaging the animal’s muscles, including the heart. It’s called “capture myopathy”.

    By 1974, the effect was so well known to veterinarians that a letter in Nature proposing a possible way to avoid it didn’t even bother explaining what it was in the first place.

    By then, researchers had realised that capturing animals for scientific or conservation purposes – such as for captive breeding, for mark-and-release studies, or for relocation – was often, ironically, fatal.

    Indeed, by the time that physicians were puzzling over that strange, apparently emotion-driven heart-attack in Massachusetts, veterinarians had already recognised stress-related cardiomyopathy in a tremendous variety of non-human species: elk, pronghorn sheep, moose, deer, scimitar-horned oryx, antelope, muntjac, wisent, gazelle, dugongs, and wild turkeys.

    Since then, that list has expanded to include duikers, Arabian oryx, dolphins, whales, ducks, little bustards, partridges, river otters, cranes, bats, a variety of shorebirds, and a slow loris. Animals who are most prone to capture myopathy are small mammals, ungulates, birds, and anxious primates.

    From around the mid-1990s, more case studies in humans, too, began to hint at physiological problems due to extreme psychological stress. In 1995, researchers Jeremy Kark, Silvie Goldman, and Leon Epstein found that Israelis were more likely to die as a result of heart-related problems on 18 January 1991 than on any day in the preceding and subsequent two months, as well as for the same period of time the previous year.

    That’s because that’s when the Persian Gulf War began, resulting in 18 missiles directed at Israel from Iraq. To be clear, the increase in mortality measured by this study was not due to injuries directly caused by the missile attacks; they were cardiovascular-related deaths that mostly occurred outside of hospital care.

    “The perception of an imminent, life-threatening situation was widespread,” the researchers wrote in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

    “To prepare for chemical attack, gas masks and automatic syringes containing atropine were distributed to the entire population. Every household prepared a sealed room. Civil defence instructions were issued in the media.”

    The entire country was heavy with anxiety to begin with, and the life-or-death fear associated with missile strikes was too much for some to bear.

    The following year, a different group of researchers took a look at sudden cardiac-related deaths in Los Angeles on 17 January 1994. That day was when a magnitude 6.8 earthquake – “one of the strongest earthquakes ever recorded in a major city in North America,” the researchers noted – struck the region at 4:31am.

    In the New England Journal of Medicine, they reported a massive spike in cardiovascular-related deaths due to the stress of the early-morning jolt. As in the case of the Israeli missile attacks, that doesn’t include traumatic injuries directly caused by the earthquake.

    These deaths are instead attributable to the extreme stress of being shaken awake by a violent earthquake. It should be noted, however, that many of those who died were not entirely healthy to begin with.

    In the 1990s Japanese researchers coined the term “takotsubo cardiomyopathy” to describe a stress-induced apparent heart attack. It was so-named because the ballooning of the left ventricle characteristic of this sort of cardiomyopathy is reminiscent to a type of fishing pot, called takotsubo, which are used to trap octopuses.

    But it wasn’t until 2005 that enough studies had been described in the medical literature that human medicine began to fully take note. That year the concept of stress cardiomyopathy was firmly established within the medical literature, though many physicians still refer to is as takotsubo, or occasionally as “broken heart syndrome.”

    So while it isn’t necessarily sadness or rejection that can hurt us physiologically, there is now little doubt that the mind and our emotions can have a direct, measurable effect on our physical bodies, and when things take a turn for the worse, it can lead to catastrophe.

    After consulting with veterinarians at the Los Angeles Zoo, it was Natterson-Horowitz, a UCLA cardiology professor, who put the heart-related aspects of capture myopathy with takotsubo cardiomyopathy side by side. In Zoobiquity, she and Bowers, a journalist, ask whether the two syndromes are really one and the same, afflicting humans and animals alike.

    It’s just a shame that it took so long for doctors to accept what wildlife biologists and veterinarians had known for decades. If this episode teaches us anything, it’s that the traits we share with animals run far deeper than first appears.

    As this column has explored, the commonalities are myriad, whether it’s the ability to dance, to rule by democracy, or to lure the opposite sex with perfume.

    They’re written into the very fabric of our biology. Our species occupies but one tiny branch on the enormous tree of life; it would be a shame if our hubris prevented us from applying knowledge derived from decades of research on every other species on the planet to our own.

    {BBC}

  • Are Sperm Counts Really Dropping Worldwide?

    Are Sperm Counts Really Dropping Worldwide?

    {{The shock conclusion of a study 20 years ago indicated that sperm counts had halved. But a closer look at the evidence then and now paints a much more complex story.}}

    Ask someone what they know about men’s sperm counts, and the chances are you will hear that they are dropping. People will probably have plenty of theories as to why this is happening – perhaps because of herbicides, pesticides, or oestrogens in the water from so many women being on the pill.

    Or there are theories based on lifestyle – for instance, men are taking less exercise, eating more fast food and getting fatter. Some even suggest that wearing tight pants can cause problems.

    But is it really true that sperm counts are in free-fall globally? To understand why this perception is so common, we have to go back to a paper published 20 years ago.

    Elisabeth Carlsen and her colleagues reviewed 61 studies of semen quality carried out between 1938 and 1990, and their conclusionspublished in the British Medical Journal in 1992 were shocking.

    In 50 years sperm counts had halved. The authors were open in saying that the data did not indicate whether or not the decline was continuing. But the mass of publicity their findings received left many with the idea that it had been proven beyond doubt – sperm counts are not only falling everywhere, but will continue to do so.

    {{Under scrutiny}}

    However, there are a number of issues with drawing conclusions about trends from these 61 original studies, and these are worth going through in some detail. Starting with the participants, studies of the sperm count of the average man are supposed to preclude men with fertility problems.

    But getting volunteers to provide semen samples is not easy, so some subjects might enrol in studies because they are concerned about their sperm count, yet fail to divulge this to the researchers.

    Different studies use different methods of ensuring that fertility is proven, but if some volunteers suspect they might have low sperm counts this could skew the sample, if you’ll forgive the pun.

    There are also other factors that vary from study to study, such as the length of time there has been between the provision of the tested sample and the previous ejaculation. Also, methods of analysing semen samples have changed between 1938 and 1990.

    The World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends using laboratory techniques that do not rely on an individual making a judgement, but this wasn’t the case for the earlier studies, making it hard to compare them with measurements taken 50 years later.

    And it is not just the practical techniques that have changed; statistical methods of analysing data have evolved too.

    When you look at the set of studies reviewed in the paper in more detail, it seems that although sperm counts do appear to have dropped in some places, they might have risen in others, even in different regions of the same country. In Paris, sperm counts appear to have declined, while they remained stable in another French city, Toulouse.

    Many of the original studies were too small to be considered as representative of a population. A re-analysis of the 20 largest studiesfound that the majority had been conducted before 1970 in New York, where sperm counts seemed particularly high.

    The later studies were from different places, which meant that sperm counts in one geographical location were compared with counts from somewhere different over a different period of time.

    Once these studies were removed, the picture looked a little different and sperm quality didn’t seem to be in decline. So perhaps the 1992 review was in fact highlighting differences between different regions, rather than differences over time.

    {{Incomplete picture}}

    Picking apart the studies in this review paper is one thing, but what does the research post-1992 tell us? The picture is mixed, with some studies still showing evidence for a decline in some places and others showing sperm counts have remained stable.

    To take two examples, a Finnish study published last year found that men born towards the end of the 1980s had lower sperm counts on average than those born at the beginning of the same decade. But Danish research that has been taking semen samples from young men about to begin military service has found no decline in sperm quality in 5,000 volunteers so far.

    Geographical location seems to make a difference, but the lack of studies conducted in low-income countries makes it difficult to establish a full picture. A paper published this year highlights the fact that even studies from middle-income countries have rarely included the poorest people.

    So, twenty years on from the BMJ paper we cannot say we have a complete picture about sperm counts globally. We can say that sperm counts are declining in some places, and this needs to taken seriously. But from the best evidence it seems this crisis is not happening everywhere.

    And without new and carefully controlled studies, we are likely to spend many more years in the dark over this issue. It is only by looking carefully at where counts are and are not falling, using the most accurate methods available, that we might find any clue to the cause.

    {wirestory}

  • Liberia Confirms two Cases of Ebola: WHO

    Liberia Confirms two Cases of Ebola: WHO

    {{The World Health Organisation (WHO) said on Sunday that Liberia has confirmed two cases of the deadly Ebola virus that is suspected to have killed at least 70 people in Guinea.}}

    The outbreak of the highly contagious Ebola, which in its more acute phase, causes vomiting, diarrhoea and external bleeding, has sent Guinea’s West African neighbors scrambling to contain the spread of the disease.

    Eleven deaths in towns in northern Sierra Leone and Liberia, which shares borders with southeastern Guinea where the outbreak was first reported, are suspected to be linked to Ebola.

    WHO said that as of March 29, seven clinical samples from adult patients from Foya district in Liberia were tested.

    “Two of those samples have tested positive for the ebolavirus,” the global health organization said in the statement on its website on Sunday, confirming for the first time the cases in country.

    “There have been 2 deaths among the suspected cases; a 35 year old woman who died on 21 March tested positive for ebolavirus while a male patient who died on 27 March tested negative,” it said.

    An official of Liberia’s health ministry who requested anonymity said the government was aware and would issue a statement on Monday.

    agencies

  • Senegal Shuts Border with Guinea Over Ebola Spreading

    Senegal Shuts Border with Guinea Over Ebola Spreading

    {{Senegal closed its land border with Guinea on Saturday to try to prevent the spread of the Ebola virus, which Guinean authorities say is suspected of killing 70 people in what would be the deadliest outbreak in seven years.}}

    The discovery of 11 people suspected to have died of Ebola in Sierra Leone and Liberia in recent days has stirred concern that one of the most lethal infectious diseases known to man could spread in a poor corner of West Africa, where health systems are ill-equipped to cope.

    Senegal’s Interior Ministry said it had closed the land border with Guinea in the southern region of Kolda and the southeastern region of Kedougou.

    “The governors of these regions have taken all the necessary steps to implement this decision,” it said in a statement published by the official APS state news agency.

    A spokesman for Guinea’s government said it had not received any official notification of Senegal’s decision. The extent of the epidemic is being exaggerated and only 19 cases of Ebola have officially been confirmed by laboratory tests, he added.

    “We’ve taken strict measures to stop this epidemic and there is no reason to panic,” Damantang Albert Camara told Reuters.

    Senegal announced on Friday it would introduce sanitary checks on flights between Dakar and the Guinean capital Conakry, where eight cases of Ebola have been confirmed, including one death.

    West African foreign ministers said at a conference in Ivory Coast this week the Ebola outbreak posed a “threat to regional security”.

    If the 70 deaths to date are all confirmed as Ebola, it would be the most deadly epidemic since 187 people died in Luebo, in Congo’s Kasai Orientale province, in 2007.

    {reuters}

  • Smoking Bans Cut Premature Births

    Smoking Bans Cut Premature Births

    {{Banning smoking in public places has helped to cut premature births by 10 percent, according to new research from the United States and Europe.}}

    A study in The Lancet medical journal found that while the impact of anti-smoking laws varies between countries, the overall effect on child health around the world is positive.

    “Our research shows that smoking bans are an effective way to protect the health of our children,” said Jasper Been of the University of Edinburgh’s Centre for Population Health Sciences, who led the study.

    He said the findings should help to accelerate the introduction of anti-smoking legislation in cities, countries and districts which have yet to do so.

    Laws banning smoking in public places such as bars, restaurants, offices and other workplaces have already been proven in previous studies to protect adults from the health threats associated with passive smoking.

    According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), tobacco already kills around 6 million people a year worldwide, including more than 600,000 non-smokers who die from exposure to second-hand smoke.

    By 2030, if current trends continue, it predicts tobacco’s death toll could be 8 million people a year.

    Only 16% of the world’s population is covered by comprehensive smoke-free laws, and 40% children worldwide are regularly exposed to second-hand smoke, the WHO says.

    Public health experts hope that as more and more countries in Europe and around the world adopt stricter legislation on smoking in public places, the health benefits will swiftly start to become evident.

    Friday’s research in The Lancet, which analyzed data on more than 2.5 million births and almost 250,000 hospital attendances for asthma attacks, was the first comprehensive study to look at how anti-smoking laws affect children’s health.

    With results from five North American studies of local bans and six European studies on national bans, it found rates of both pre-term births and hospital attendance for asthma fell by 10% within a year of smoke-free laws coming into effect.

    “Together with the known health benefits in adults, our study provides clear evidence that smoking bans have considerable public health benefits for perinatal and child health,” said Been.

    He said it also provided “strong support for WHO recommendations to create smoke-free public environments on a national level.”

    BBC

  • World Now 80% Polio Free-WHO Says

    World Now 80% Polio Free-WHO Says

    {{The World Health Organization has declared its South East Asia region polio-free.
    The certification is being hailed a “historic milestone” in the global fight to eradicate the deadly virus.}}

    It comes after India officially recorded three years without a new case of polio.

    The announcement means 80% of the world is now officially free of polio, although the disease is still endemic in Afghanistan, Nigeria and Pakistan.

    Other countries in the WHO South East Asia region, such as Sri Lanka, Maldives and Bhutan, have been free of the virus for more than 15 years.

    However, despite the “huge global significance” of the announcement, the WHO admits there are still major challenges to overcome if the world is the reach the goal of eradicating polio everywhere by 2018.

    There have also been outbreaks in conflict-hit countries such as Syria, which had previously managed to stamp out the virus.

    Polio mainly affects children under five years old. The virus is transmitted through contaminated food and water, and multiplies in the intestine. It can then invade the nervous system, causing paralysis in one in every 200 infections.

    South East Asia is the fourth of six WHO regions to be declared polio-free after the Americas, Western Pacific and Europe regions. Eastern Mediterranean and Africa have yet to gain a similar status.

    Dr Poonam Khetrapal Singh, WHO South East Asia regional director, said: “This is very significant because before this region was certified polio-free, we had half the world’s population polio free.

    “With the South East Asia region being added we now have 80% of the population polio free.

    “This was a problem the region was struggling with for a long time, but now finally, we are polio free.”

    Many experts thought India would be the last country in the world to get rid of polio says Deepak Kapur, of Rotary International’s India National Polio Plus Committee.

    He said India faced several enormous challenges including its large population.

    He said: “India has close to 170 million children under five who needed to be immunised.

    “Then there’s the existence of insanitary conditions which helped the polio virus to proliferate – and impure drinking water because polio is a water borne disease.”

    But he said the fact that India had managed it and now the whole of South East Asia could be declared polio free sent a powerful and optimistic message to the three remaining polio-endemic countries.

    The world signed up to eradicating polio in 1988. The Global Polio Eradication Initiative was launched, which is a partnership between governments and organisations such as Unicef, the WHO and Rotary International. The aim was to banish polio once and for all.

    In 1988 there were 350,000 recorded cases. By 2012 cases had fallen to 223. But last year there was a rise in cases to 406 new infections.

    The increase is largely down to vaccination campaigns being interrupted by conflict. In October 2013, Syria reported its first case of polio since 1999. By March 2014 there were 25 cases.

    An outbreak in the Horn of Africa, which started in May 2013, has seen 217 new cases in Somalia, Kenya and Ethiopia.

    While Thursday’s announcement clearly marked an important milestone, there was still a long way to go, said Mr Kapur.

    “Every child in the world is at risk of contracting polio until such a time as the wild polio virus is completely eradicated from every part of the world,” he said.

    “Until then no child – be it in North America or Europe – will be free of polio potentially hunting them down all over again.

    “The only way to ensure the wild polio virus no longer exists in any part of the world is to wipe it out of every community in the world.

    “It is not good enough to wipe it out on one continent and not the rest of the world because today the world is just one global village.

    “The only way to keep polio away is through immunisation.”

    He said if every child on the planet were immunised, there would be nowhere for the virus to flourish and spread.

    “Today’s a big occasion for the entire global polio eradication initiative because if India – which had the most difficult of situations – can do it, others around the world can do it too,” Mr Kapur said.

    “So Pakistan, Afghanistan and Nigeria need to replicate the example of India and go after this virus.

    “Global eradication could and should be achieved in the very near future.”

    BBC

  • Uganda, Kenya Step Up Ebola Surveillance

    Uganda, Kenya Step Up Ebola Surveillance

    {{Uganda and Kenya have publicly announced plans to install surveillence teams at all entry points especially airports in order to curtail Ebola spread into their territories.}}

    The vilgilance follows reports of deadly Ebola outbreak in Guinea which has so far killed more than 60 people.

    Kenya government says persons traveling from Guinea will undergo special check at all ports of entry.

    A senior government official in Kenya says, “We have been notified of the outbreak of Ebola Haemorrhagic fever in Guinea by the World Health Organisation, already 86 suspected cases including 60 deaths have been reported.”