Author: Théophile Niyitegeka

  • Low level of oxygen in Earth’s middle ages delayed evolution for two billion years

    {A low level of atmospheric oxygen in Earth’s middle ages held back evolution for 2 billion years, raising fresh questions about the origins of life on this planet.}

    A low level of atmospheric oxygen in Earth’s middle ages held back evolution for 2 billion years, raising fresh questions about the origins of life on this planet.

    New research by the University of Exeter explains how oxygen was trapped at such low levels.

    Professor Tim Lenton and Dr Stuart Daines of the University of Exeter Geography department, created a computer model to explain how oxygen stabilised at low levels and failed to rise any further, despite oxygen already being produced by early photosynthesis. Their research helps explain why the ‘great oxidation event’, which introduced oxygen into the atmosphere around 2.4 billion years ago, did not generate modern levels of oxygen.

    In their paper, published in Nature Communications, Atmospheric oxygen regulation at low Proterozoic levels by incomplete oxidative weathering of sedimentary organic carbon, the University of Exeter scientists explain how organic material — the dead bodies of simple lifeforms — accumulated in the earth’s sedimentary rocks. After the Great Oxidation, and once plate tectonics pushed these sediments to the surface, they reacted with oxygen in the atmosphere for the first time.

    The more oxygen in the atmosphere, the faster it reacted with this organic material, creating a regulatory mechanism whereby the oxygen was consumed by the sediments at the same rate at which it was produced.

    This mechanism broke down with the rise of land plants and a resultant doubling of global photosynthesis. The increasing concentration of oxygen in the atmosphere eventually overwhelmed the control on oxygen and meant it could finally rise to the levels we are used to today.

    This helped animals colonise the land, leading eventually to the evolution of humankind.

    The model suggests atmospheric oxygen was likely at around 10% of present day levels during the two billion years following the Great Oxidation Event, and no lower than 1% of the oxygen levels we know today.

    Professor Lenton said: “This time in Earth’s history was a bit of a catch-22 situation. It wasn’t possible to evolve complex life forms because there was not enough oxygen in the atmosphere, and there wasn’t enough oxygen because complex plants hadn’t evolved — It was only when land plants came about did we see a more significant rise in atmospheric oxygen.

    “The history of life on Earth is closely intertwined with the physical and chemical mechanisms of our planet. It is clear that life has had a profound role in creating the world we are used to, and the planet has similarly affected the trajectory of life. I think it’s important people acknowledge the miracle of their own existence and recognise what an amazing planet this is.”

    Life on earth is believed to have begun with the first bacteria evolving 3.8 billion years ago. Around 2.7 billion years ago the first oxygen-producing photosynthesis evolved in the oceans. But it was not until 600 million years ago that the first multi-celled animals such as sponges and jellyfish emerged in the ocean. By 470 million years ago the first plants grew on land with the first land animals such as millipedes appearing around 428 million years ago. Mammals did not rise to ecological prominence until after the dinosaurs went extinct 65 million years ago. Humans first appeared on earth 200,000 years ago.

    New research explains how atmospheric oxygen was trapped at low levels following the Great Oxidation.
  • Rusizi man arrested over murder

    {A man identified as Nakuzeyezu Potien aged 27 from Mwimerere village, Nyamihanda cell of Butare sector in Rusizi district has been arrested over alleged murder of his aunt and uncle in a land related conflicts.}

    IGIHE has learnt that the incident took place yesterday around 19:00 hours.

    One of residents of Mwimerere village has told IGIHE that the murder may have risen from land conflicts.

    “The man came equipped with a machete and stabbed his aunt and uncle. I know that they had land-related conflicts,” he said.

    The victims are identified as Nangwahose Benedigito, 56, and Mukamudenge Suzana, 52, as confirmed by the executive secretary of Butare sector, Janvier Habiyaremye.

    “The deceased lived together with the murderer. The man stabbed his aunt and uncle yesterday evening seeking to remain in control of disputed land,” he said.

    The deceased were taken to Mibirizi hospital for postmortem while the murderer was taken to Nyakabuye police station.

  • Tigo Rwanda provides network link for RRA branches

    {Tigo Rwanda has connected 125 Rwanda Revenue Authority (RRA) offices and posts at the provincial, district and sector level with a secure VPN link connecting the tax collection centers to RRA head offices.}

    The VPN project, which started in August 2016 was completed and handed over to RRA on 23, December 2016.

    This secured VPN link allows various RRA branches located at local government offices to send data to RRA Headquarters in Kimihurura, Kigali City in real time.

    Commenting on the successful completion, Tigo Rwanda Chief Business Officer (CBO), AmitChawla, said:

    “With the completion of our first large-scale VPN project, we have proved that Tigo Rwanda is a serious player in the ICT market. This partnership is further proof that Tigo is a reliable service provider for both data and voice solutions”.

    This latest partnership comes on the heels of Tigo Rwanda’s commissioning of a wholesale IP Transit service for KT Rwanda Networks. On 4, August, Tigo Rwanda became the first Rwandan telecom operator to provide IP transfers at such a large scale. Under this 10-year partnership with KT Rwanda Networks, Tigo Rwanda will provide STM-4 Bandwidth over a secured network with a bit rate of 622Mbit/s. Previously, international Internet traffic from Rwanda relied on regional and international carriers such as BCS-Kenya, WIOCC, and SeaComm.

    RRA headquarters
  • King Kigeli V last testament revealed

    {The final testament of the late King Kigeli V has been discovered and aired to members of the public. }

    In a statement released by his former spokesperson Boniface Benzingye, it has been revealed that the testament was assembled on 12th December 2006 laying down how and who should execute the same.

    Bezingye says he obtained will from Portugal after the ruling of a Virginia, USA court.
    In the testament, King Kigeli V Ndahindurwa wrote that the elected council of scribes will appoint his successor who would be granted all powers as per Rwandan culture including his rights of making order as a King and receiving his honorary title.

    The testament indicates that the head of council of scribes would be the successor. He also stated that the council of scribes will also include as the general secretary, Albert Alexander Montague, and deputy general secretary, Carl E.Lindgren and other members that could not exceed 12.

    The testament doesn’t indicate where the King chose to be buried. However Benzigye explains that he met Ducke de Braganza and Bishop Abilio among others in Portugal who informed him that King Kigeli V had unveiled his preference of being buried in Portugal.

    The statement is not far different from that of Pastor Ezra Mpyisi who announced recently that relatives of King Kigeli V were told that the latter’s testament indicates that he had to be buried in Portugal. He attributed the latter to the aid Portuguese offered to Kigeli when alive.

  • Malawi Police in manhunt for Rwandan refugee murder suspect

    {Dowa Police Relations Officer Richard Kaponda told Mana in a telephone interview on Wednesday that unknown criminals are said to have strangled the deceased with his belt on the night of Monday, January 30, 2017.}

    “The deceased was last seen on January 30, drawing water from a nearby borehole. When his sister Mrs Nyirahabimana Kasilida went outside her house to answer the call of nature during the night, she spotted Kamiziyo lying dead outside his house and later reported the matter to Dzaleka Police Unit,” he said.

    Kaponda said a visit to the scene by criminal investigation officers revealed that the deceased who the PRO alleged was a habitual criminal, was attacked by unknown assailants.

    Postmortem conducted at Dowa District Hospital according to the PRO revealed that Kamiziyo died due to strangulation.

    “We have currently intensified search for the criminals who when arrested will answer charges of murder which is contrary to section 209 of the Penal Code,” he said.

    The deceased came from Butare province in Rwanda.

    Dzaleka refugee camp in Malawi accommodating Rwandans.
  • Trump rips into Australia’s Turnbull, calls deal ‘dumb’

    {US president calls refugee deal with Australia “dumb” after report leaked of harsh call with Prime Minister Turnbull.}

    US President Donald Trump ripped into his Australian counterpart in a phone call last week, reports said, castigating an Obama-era refugee deal he later described on Twitter as a “dumb deal”.

    The Washington Post said Trump abruptly cut short the fiery conversation after criticising the agreement to re-settle people kept in Pacific camps, sparking a war of words with Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull on Thursday after the report surfaced.

    Australia is considered a close US ally – one of the so-called “Five Eyes” with which the US routinely shares sensitive intelligence – and the call might have been expected to be smooth sailing.
    But, according to the Post, Trump’s assessment was the opposite.

    Of his four conversations with world leaders that day “This was the worst call by far,” it cited him as telling Turnbull, shortly before he terminated the telephone meeting.

    Australian government sources told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation the report was “substantially accurate”.

    Turnbull said he was disappointed details of the “very frank and forthright” exchange had been leaked.

    “As far as the call is concerned I’m very disappointed that there has been a leak of purported details of the call in Washington,” he told Sydney radio station 2GB.

    “But I want to make one observation about it – the report that the president hung up is not correct. The call ended courteously.”

    He added that Canberra had “very, very strong standards in the way we deal with other leaders and we are not about to reveal details of conversations other than in a manner that is agreed.”

    The Post’s account is markedly different from the official version of the call provided by both governments.

    Turnbull said on Monday that Trump had agreed to honor the deal agreed with then president Barack Obama to resettle an unspecified number of the 1,600 people Australia holds in offshore detention centers on the islands of Nauru and Papua New Guinea.

    There were fears the new US president would rescind it after he signed an executive order last week to suspend the arrival of refugees to the US for a least 120 days, and bar entry for three months to people from seven Muslim-majority countries.

    {{Diplomatic crisis }}

    After the Post story broke late on Wednesday, Trump weighed in on Twitter and threw the agreement into doubt.

    After seeing the tweet, Turnbull insisted that Trump had already agreed it would go ahead.

    “The commitment made by the president in that call was made and we announced that and it was confirmed by his spokesman a day or so later,” he said.

    Reports of the Turnbull-Trump conversation came as the US and Mexican governments were denying claims that the former reality TV star had threatened to send troops into Mexico to deal with drug cartels.

    Mexican journalist Dolia Estevez, citing “confidential” US and Mexican sources, said Trump made the threat during an hour-long phone call with President Enrique Pena Nieto on Friday.

    Mexican and White House officials vehemently denied the report.

    Relations have plunged into the biggest diplomatic crisis between the two neighbors in decades.

    Trump angered Mexicans last week by ordering the construction of a massive border wall and vowing to make their country pay for the wall.

    Pena Nieto has pledged that his government will never pay for the barrier and canceled a meeting with Trump scheduled for this week in Washington.

    In addition to the row over the wall, Trump wants to renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement with Canada and Mexico. Mexican officials expect talks to begin in May.

  • NATO calls on Russia to stop violence in Ukraine

    {NATO chief says Russia must end the violence as both sides move heavy artillery close to front line.}

    NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg has called on Russia to use its “considerable influence” to end fighting in eastern Ukraine after a renewed surge in violence there.

    Moscow-backed rebels and government forces have trade blame for the flare-up in the industrial east that has seen the highest casualty rate since mid-December and cut off power and water to thousands of civilians on both sides of the front line.

    The shelling eased on Wednesday, but the January 29 to 31 clashes near the Kiev-held front line town of Avdiyivka brought the festering conflict back into focus amid warnings of a looming humanitarian crisis.

    “We call for an immediate return to the ceasefire,” Stoltenberg said in Brussels. “We call on Russia to use its considerable influence over the separatists to bring the violence to an end.”

    Ukraine and NATO accuse Russia of providing troops and weapons to support separatist rebels in the country’s east in a conflict that has killed 10,000 people since April 2014. Moscow denies that.

    Michael Bociurkiw, a spokesman for the European security body OSCE’s mission to Ukraine, told Al Jazeera that the new US administration was not being clear about how it would deal with the rising tensions.

    “In the previous administration, Russians were really attacked for their activities in eastern Ukraine but the Trump administration is really sending mixed signals,” he said.

    “The big fear is that Trump may withdraw support for the sanctions against Russia and that could turn a chain reaction where Greece, Italy and other EU members may also withdraw support.”

    {{The NATO factor}}

    Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko is planning a referendum on whether Ukraine should join the NATO alliance given polls that show 54 percent of Ukrainians now favour such a move, Germany’s Funke Mediengruppe newspaper chain reported on Thursday.

    “Four years ago, only 16 percent (of the Ukrainian people) favoured Ukraine’s entry into NATO. Now it’s 54 percent,” the media group quoted Poroshenko as saying in an interview.

    “As president, I am guided by the views of my people, and I will hold a referendum on the issue of NATO membership.”

    He vowed to “do all I can to achieve membership in the transatlantic alliance” if the people voted in favour.

    NATO and Ukraine have had a close relationship since the early 1990s, and their ties are one of the “most substantial” of NATO’s partnerships, according to the alliance’s website.

    However, any move by NATO to admit Ukraine would spark tensions with Russia, which says NATO already violated earlier promises by admitting Poland and other eastern European countries in the 1990s.

    Poroshenko also predicted it would not take long until Ukraine fulfilled the entry criteria to join the European Union.

    He said Kiev had reduced its budget deficit and inflation, and had taken important steps to reduce corruption.

    The EU last year spelled out limits to a landmark cooperation agreement with Ukraine to address Dutch concerns, but said the deal did not make Ukraine a candidate for EU membership.

    The death toll from the latest escalation in fighting in Ukraine rose to 19 on February 1 as international alarm rang out
  • US puts Iran ‘on notice’ after missile test confirmed

    {US national security adviser signals toughening stance on Tehran after Iran insists tests did not breach nuclear accord.}

    US President Donald Trump’s national security adviser has signalled a toughening US stance on Iran, condemning a recent missile test and declaring Washington was “officially putting Iran on notice”.

    In his first public remarks since taking office, National Security Adviser Michael Flynn accused former president Barack Obama’s administration on Wednesday of having “failed to respond adequately to Tehran’s malign actions”.

    Citing a recent missile test and the actions of Iranian-backed rebels in Yemen, Flynn said on Wednesday that “Iran is now feeling emboldened”.

    “As of today, we are officially putting Iran on notice,” he said without elaborating.

    Both Trump and Flynn have been vocal opponents of an international deal that saw Iran curb its nuclear programme in return for sanctions relief.

    Earlier on Wednesday, Iran confirmed that it carried out a new missile test, but insisted that it did not breach Tehran’s nuclear accord with world powers or a UN Security Council resolution endorsing the agreement.

    Hossein Dehghan, Iran’s defence minister, on Wednesday defended Sunday’s test after the US called an urgent UN Security meeting to discuss the issue.

    “The recent test was in line with our plans and we will not allow foreigners to interfere in our defence affairs,” Dehghan said, according to the Tasnim news agency.

    “The test did not violate the nuclear deal or the [UN] resolution 2231,” he said.

    On Tuesday, Javad Zarif, foreign minister, affirmed that Iran’s missile tests do not involve rockets with nuclear warheads and are not part of the historic deal signed two years ago by world powers, but stopped short of confirming the test.

    In an interview with Al Jazeera, Trita Parsi, of the National Iranian American Council, said that even though the Iranians are not violating both the deal and the UN resolution, doing the test was “clearly provocative”.

    “It was meant to test the new Trump administration,” he said. “I don’t think that is particularly a good idea. Because this is an administration that seems to be ideologically opposed to the very concept of de-escalation.”

    But Parsi also said that the White House statement is “very dangerous”.

    “What started off as bluster may very quickly turn into a real war.”

    {{‘Deterrence against hostile enemies’}}

    A White House official, speaking on condition of anonymity, had said a ballistic missile test was carried out on Sunday from a site near Semnan, east of Tehran, according to the Reuters news agency.

    The medium-range ballistic missile reportedly exploded after 1,010km, the official said, adding that the last time this type of device was test-launched was in July 2016.

    The new US ambassador to the United Nations, Nikki Haley, called the test “unacceptable”, after Tuesday’s emergency session.

    The test drew wide condemnation as many feared it could be in violation of the UN resolution which was part of the 2015 nuclear deal between Iran and the US, UK, France, China, Russia and Germany.

    Meanwhile, some 220 Iranian members of parliament reaffirmed support for Tehran’s missile programme, calling international condemnation of the tests “illogical”.

    “The Islamic Republic of Iran is against weapons of mass destruction, so its missile capability is the only available deterrence against enemy hostility,” MPs said in a statement carried on state media on Wednesday.

    The state news agency IRNA quoted Ali Shamkhani, head of Iran’s National Security Council, as saying Iran would not seek “permission from any country or international organisation for development of our conventional defensive capability”.

    During the US election campaign, President Donald Trump branded the nuclear agreement “the worst deal ever negotiated”, telling voters that he would either rip it up or seek a better deal.

  • EU ‘deeply regrets’ Israel’s settlement expansion

    {Bloc decries Israeli plans for thousands of new settler homes on occupied Palestinian land.}

    Israel’s recent stream of announcements that it will build thousands of new settler homes in the occupied West Bank “marks a very worrying trend” and risks making a two-state solution impossible, according to the European Union.

    Federica Mogherini, the bloc’s foreign policy chief, released on Wednesday a strongly worded statement decrying continued settlement expansion, which she noted is “illegal under international law”.

    The EU “deeply regrets that Israel is proceeding with this, despite the continuous serious international concern and objections, which have been constantly raised at all levels,” she said.

    On Tuesday, Israel announced the construction of 3,000 settlement homes in the West Bank, the fourth such announcement in the less than two weeks since the inauguration of US President Donald Trump.

    Since Trump came to power, Israel has approved the construction of 566 housing units in three settlement areas of occupied East Jerusalem and announced the building of 2,502 more in the West Bank.

    On Thursday last week, Israeli officials gave final approval for 153 settler homes in East Jerusalem.

    “Defence Minister Avigdor Lieberman and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have decided to authorise the construction of 3,000 new housing units in Judea-Samaria,” the defence ministry said in a statement on Tuesday, using the term Israel uses for the West Bank, a Palestinian territory it has occupied since 1967.

    Expansion plans had been frozen under pressure from the previous US administration of President Barack Obama, which had warned that settlements could derail hopes of a negotiated two-state solution.

    Trump, however, has pledged strong support for Israel, and Netanyahu’s government has moved quickly to take advantage.

    “We are building and we will continue building,” Netanyahu said last week, referring to settlement approvals.

    The prime minister has said he sees the Trump presidency as offering “significant opportunities” after facing “huge pressures” from Obama on Iran and settlements.

    All Israeli settlements are illegal under international law. The international community views them as a major obstacle to peace as they are built on land the Palestinians see as part of their future state.

    More than a half million Israelis live in Jewish-only settlements across the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem, according to the Israeli rights group B’Tselem.

    “Since the start of 2017, the Israeli authorities have made clear that they plan to accelerate the construction of illegal settlement homes and seize further Palestinian territory in flagrant violation of international law,” said Magdalena Mughrabi, Amnesty International’s deputy director for the Middle East and North Africa.

    “The flurry of recent announcements signals that the Israeli government, emboldened by the Trump administration, feels no need to hide its brazen violations of the rights of the occupied Palestinian population.”

    Federica Mogherini, EU foreign policy chief, decried the expansion of settlements as a threat to the two-state solution
  • Abdullah bin Zayed: Trump’s travel ban not Islamophobic

    {Abdullah bin Zayed says President Trump’s order affecting citizens of Muslim-majority countries is not Islamophobic.}

    The United Arab Emirates’ foreign minister has said that US President Donald Trump’s travel ban on citizens of seven mainly Muslim countries, which has triggered global outrage, is not Islamophobic and does not target any one religion.

    Trump’s order affecting nationals from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen has sparked protests across the United States and beyond. Four US states have filed legal cases against the travel ban for alleged religious discrimination.

    But Abdullah bin Zayed al-Nahyan, foreign minister of the UAE – a Muslim country – defended the ban on Wednesday.

    He said that most Muslims and Muslim countries were not included in the ban.

    The affected countries, he added, faced “challenges” that they needed to address.

    “The United States has taken a decision that is within the American sovereign decision,” he said at a joint news conference with his Russian counterpart Sergey Lavrov in the capital Abu Dhabi.

    “There are attempts to give the impression that this decision is directed against a particular religion, but what proves this talk to be incorrect first is what the US administration itself says … that this decision is not directed at a certain religion.”

    Trump on Friday signed the executive order that will curb immigration and the entry of citizens from seven Muslim-majority countries, saying it was a necessary measure to improve national security.

    He separately said he wanted the US to give priority to Syrian Christians fleeing the conflict there.

    The travel ban has disrupted many people’s lives by dividing families and left travellers stranded. Dozens were detained at airports, including green card holders.

    Gulf Arab countries have been largely absent from the condemnation of the ban. Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the UAE, Qatar and Bahrain have traditionally been close US allies, and all were left off the travel ban.

    Of the five countries, the only one to express mild disapproval in public was Qatar, whose foreign minister was quoted during a visit to Serbia as saying he hoped Washington would reassess the ban.

    “When it comes to be addressed in a Muslim framework, I think this is something we will stand against,” Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim Al Thani said.

    Some Gulf officials even backed it openly. Dhahi Khalfan, a senior Dubai police official, tweeted on Monday “complete support” for Trump’s ban. “Every country has the right to protect its security … Trump, what you’re doing is right.”

    Meanwhile, European leaders, the United Nations and international groups have condemned Trump’s measures, as passport holders from Arab countries affected by the ban were blocked from passing through customs at US airports and others were prevented from boarding US-bound planes.

    The United Nations refugee agency and the International Organization for Migration called on the Trump administration to continue offering asylum to people fleeing war and persecution, saying its resettlement programme was vital.

    “The needs of refugees and migrants worldwide have never been greater and the US resettlement programme is one of the most important in the world,” the two Geneva-based agencies said in a joint statement on Saturday.

    Amid growing protests, legal challenges to Trump’s anti-immigration moves have spread.

    The US states of Massachusetts, New York, Virginia and Washington have filed legal cases, contending that the order violates the US Constitution’s guarantees of religious freedom.

    Legal challenges alleging religious discrimination have been launched against the travel ban