Author: Théophile Niyitegeka

  • 5 importance of loving yourself

    {Charity they say begins at home, and it’s very important to love yourself. It’s not selfish to love yourself, as long as you go about it the right way.}

    These are 5 very important reasons you should love yourself:

    {{1. You know your value}}

    You understand your worth and your value when you love yourself, and when you know how valuable you are, you wouldn’t succumb to the trash people throw at you. People will value you more when you value yourself.

    {{2. You can love others better }}

    When you are able to love yourself genuinely, you then make it easy to love others as well. When your heart is full of love; you wouldn’t find it difficult to see the good in others, and live without jealousy. You’ll love people more and be kinder and more generous to others, when you love yourself.

    {{3. You experience peace}}

    When you love yourself, you feel peace within you; you feel contented with yourself, and you feel grateful for all the things going on in your life, even when things seem to be going the wrong way.

    {{4. You don’t live in competition with others}}

    When you love yourself, you won’t be in competition with anyone; you would be contented and satisfied with what you have, and you wouldn’t be envious of other people’s success.

    {{5. You make it easy for people to love you }}

    The kind of life you live when you love yourself makes it easier for people to love you. People feel more comfortable with you when they know you value yourself, you are at peace with yourself and you aren’t in competition with anyone.

    Loving yourself is probably the best thing you can do for yourself.

    Source:Elcrema

  • Dinosaurs: Juvenile, adult or senior?

    {How old were the oldest dinosaurs? This question remains largely unanswered. The natural life span of these long-extinct giants is of interest to scientists, in combination with questions regarding how fast they could grow and how they could obtain sufficient nutrients from their habitat. Palaeontologists at the University of Bonn estimate by means of bone structures whether a particular dinosaur fossil is a young, adult or very old animal. The results have now been published in the journal Paleobiology.}

    “Many animals show growth lines in their bones while they are growing — similar to annual rings in a tree trunk,” reports palaeontologist Jessica Mitchell from the Steinmann Institute of the University of Bonn. However, as bone ages, regular repair procedures are carried out to renew bone. These repair structures in the bone (osteons) are so small that they can only be detected with a microscope.

    In adult dinosaurs, the bone is transformed such that the growth lines are completely destroyed. Instead, only the repair structures are visible in the bones, which eventually overlap each other. “We can see several generations of osteons in the bone of animals with advanced age,” says Jessica Mitchell. “Our research objective was to investigate whether these repair structures could be used as indicators of age.” The research team compared differently sized bones of 79 specimens of several long-necked dinosaurs, representing young to old individuals: the bones of an adolescent have a few repair structures, while bones of an older individual are completely rebuilt.

    The researchers are able to roughly estimate whether the animals are young or adult in age. But is it possible to determine a higher age between two adult dinosaurs? This question can be answered by analysing the repair structures. For this, the researchers only need a small sample of the fossilized bone: a drill core is ground and polished until only a small, translucent plate remains. Under a light microscope, the bone plate can be examined and the structures of interest can be measured.

    {{Bone reconstruction in dinosaurs is similar to humans}}

    Despite the size difference, inside, the bones of aging dinosaurs are very similar to those of us humans: the repair processes in dinosaurs, humans and many vertebrate animals follow the same pattern. “This reconstruction process is continually taking place within us and ensures that we have a new skeleton more or less every ten years,” emphasizes the palaeontologist. In forensics and anthropology, bones are also examined to determine the age of humans. The bone structure analysis helped determine that “Ötzi” the 5,000-year-old ice man died roughly at the age of 45.

    Although bones do not appear to be active organs, such as the heart or lungs, they are much more than just the solid structures inside our body. Bones contain blood vessels that supply nutrients and bone cells that signal to each other that a repair is necessary. The study showed that the number of osteon generations, which have gradually formed during the reconstruction of the bones, gives an important indication as to whether an animal is younger or older in a comparative study.

    {{Great potential in extinct animals}}

    “With this method an absolute value for age is not yet possible,” says Mitchell. Extending the study with more dinosaur bones could further improve the outcome. Another future approach is to compare the bone structures of dinosaurs with living vertebrate animals, the actual age of which can be known. This comparison might also allow for more specific ages for dinosaurs.

    Palaeontologist Jessica Mitchell of the Steinmann Institute, University of Bonn with the thigh bone of the long-necked dinosaur Apatosaurus.

    Source:Science Daily

  • Land grab law ‘allows theft, stalls peace process’

    {Law that retroactively legalises settler homes on private Palestinian land widely condemned as legitimising theft.}

    An Israeli land grab law that retroactively legalises thousands of settlement homes in the occupied West Bank legitimises theft, violates international law and ends the prospect of a two-state solution, according to politicians, legal experts and human rights groups.

    The so-called “Regulation Bill” drew immediate condemnation after it was voted in by members of the Knesset late on Monday with a 60 to 52 majority.

    The law applies to about 4,000 settlement homes in the West Bank for which settlers could prove ignorance that they had built on privately owned Palestinian land and had received encouragement from the Israeli state to do so.

    Three Israeli NGOs – Peace Now, Yesh Din and the Association for Civil Rights in Israel – and numerous Palestinians said they intended to petition the Supreme Court to cancel the law.

    UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said on Tuesday in a statement: “This bill is in contravention of international law and will have far-reaching legal consequences for Israel.”

    The EU’s foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini said in a statement that the bloc “condemns” the law and urges against its implementation “to avoid measures that further raise tensions and endanger the prospects for a peaceful solution to the conflict”.

    Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said the law was an aggression against the Palestinian people.

    “That bill is contrary to international law,” Abbas said after a meeting with French President Francois Hollande in Paris. “This is an aggression against our people that we will be opposing in international organisations.

    “What we want is peace … but what Israel does is to work toward one state based on apartheid.”

    Hollande called on Israel to go back on the law, saying it would “pave the way for an annexation, de facto, of the occupied territories, which would be contrary to the two-state solution”.

    Hours before Abbas’ meeting with Hollande, Saeb Erekat, secretary-general of the Palestinian Liberation Organisation, told the Associated Press news agency that the law put “the last nail in the coffin of the two-state solution”.

    Calling it “theft”, Erekat said the ruling showed “the Israeli government trying to legalise looting Palestinian land”.

    The Arab League accused Israel of “stealing the land” from Palestinians.

    “The law in question is only a cover for stealing the land and appropriating the property of Palestinians,” the head of the Cairo-based organisation, Ahmed Aboul Gheit, said.

    Palestinian owners will be compensated financially or with other land, but cannot negotiate their terms.

    The law is a continuation of “Israeli policies aimed at eliminating any possibility of a two-state solution and the establishment of an independent Palestinian state”, Aboul Gheit said.

    Jordan, one of the few Arab states to have diplomatic ties with Israel, also denounced what it called “a provocative law likely to kill any hope of a two-state solution”.

    According to the UN envoy for the Middle East peace process, Nickolay Mladenov, the law crosses a “very thick red line” towards annexation of the occupied West Bank, and sets a “very dangerous precedent”.

    Speaking to the AFP news agency, he said: “This is the first time the Israeli Knesset legislates in the occupied Palestinian lands and particularly on property issues.”

    He also raised the possibility the law could open Israel up to potential prosecution at the International Criminal Court, a threat Israel’s own top government lawyer, attorney general Avichai Mandelblit, has warned of.

    Mladenov called for strong international condemnation of the legislation, but declined to criticise the US after President Donald Trump’s administration refused to comment on it.

    Trump is more sympathetic to Israel’s settlement policies than previous US presidents. The Israeli government has approved plans to build thousands of new homes on occupied territory since the new US president took office.

    “I think that is a very preliminary statement,” Mladenov said. “Obviously, they do need to consult, this is a new administration that has just come into office and they should be given the time and the space to find their policies.”

    White House spokesman Sean Spicer said the US was likely to discuss the law with Netanyahu when the Israeli prime minister visits on February 15, but did not comment further in a press briefing on Tuesday.

    David Harris, head of AJC, the global Jewish advocacy organisation, said that “Israel’s High Court can and should reverse this misguided legislation” before Netanyahu’s meeting with Trump in February.

    That was also the message from Defence Minister Avigdor Lieberman, who said last week: “The chance that it will be struck down by the Supreme Court is 100 percent.”

    Tobias Ellwood, Britain’s Middle East minister, also condemned the land grab bill, saying it “is of great concern that the bill paves the way for significant growth in settlements deep in the West Bank”.

    Yuval Shany, an international law professor at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, said the law violated basic rights, interferes with property rights and is discriminatory because it regulates only the transfer of land from Palestinians to Jews

    {{‘Against all international laws’}}

    International law considers all settlements to be illegal, but Israel distinguishes between those it sanctions and those it does not, which are dubbed outposts.

    A Palestinian cabinet minister also called on the international community for support.

    “Nobody can legalise the theft of the Palestinian lands. Building settlements is a crime, building settlements is against all international laws,” said Palestinian Tourism and Antiquities Minister Rula Maayaa. “I think it is time now for the international community to act concretely to stop the Israelis from these crimes.”

    Nabil Abu Rdeneh, a spokesman for Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, called the law “unacceptable” and urged the international community to act immediately.

    “This is an escalation that would only lead to more instability and chaos,” Rdeneh said.

    Palestinians want the occupied West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip – territories Israel occupied in the 1967 Middle East war – for their future state.

    The international community views settlements as illegal and an obstacle to reaching peace.

    Shortly before leaving office, former US President Barack Obama allowed the UN Security Council to pass a resolution declaring settlements illegal.

    Source:Al Jazeera

  • US court grills Trump lawyer over ‘terror’ threats

    {Ruling on US administration’s travel ban expected soon after judges demand ‘terrorism’ evidence linked to seven nations.}

    A US federal appeals court has questioned whether a travel ban ordered by President Donald Trump unfairly targeted people from seven Muslim-majority countries.

    During an oral argument lasting more than an hour, a three-judge panel of the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals pressed a government lawyer on Tuesday over whether the Trump administration’s national security argument was backed by evidence that people from the seven nations posed a danger.

    The San Francisco-based 9th Circuit said at the end of the session it would issue a ruling as soon as possible, thought to be this week. The matter is ultimately likely to go to the US Supreme Court.

    “I actually can’t believe that we’re having to fight to protect the security, in a court system, to protect the security of our nation,” Trump said on Tuesday.

    “This is a very dangerous period of time because while everybody is talking and dealing, a lot of bad people are thinking, ‘Hey, let’s go in right now’.”

    The president’s January 27 order barred travellers from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen from entering for 90 days and all refugees for 120 days, except refugees from Syria, whom he would ban indefinitely.

    The order sparked protests and chaos at US and overseas airports. Opponents also assailed it as discriminatory against Muslims in violation of the US Constitution and applicable laws.

    Minnesota and Washington states are challenging the ban.

    Lawyer August Flentje represented the Trump administration in court on Tuesday.

    When asked by the judges what evidence was used to connect the seven countries with attacks in the US, he said the “proceedings have been moving very fast” – without giving specific examples.

    “I’m not sure I’m convincing the court,” Flentje said at one point.

    Noah Purcell, solicitor general for the state of Washington, began his argument urging the court to serve “as a check on executive abuses.

    “The president is asking this court to abdicate that role here,” Purcell said. “The court should decline that invitation.”

    Trump frequently promised during his 2016 election campaign to curb undocumented immigration, especially from Mexico, and to crack down on “Islamic terrorism”.

    A federal judge in Seattle suspended Trump’s order last Friday and many travellers who had been waylaid by the ban quickly moved to travel to the United States while it was in limbo.

    Syrian immigrant Mathyo Asali said he thought his life was “ruined” when he landed at Philadelphia International Airport on January 28 only to be denied entry to the United States.

    Asali, who returned to Damascus, said he believed he’d be inducted into the Syrian military. He was back on US soil on Monday.

    “It’s really nice to know that there’s a lot of people supporting us,” Asali said.

    Michael Shure, a Los Angeles-based writer and political analyst, told Al Jazeera the legal battle was likely to be a long one for the Trump administration.

    “This is almost new law here, so when it was handed down in such a way lawyers felt ‘we can go to the courts with this – we can go and say this is unconstitutional’, which is what these lawyers are doing in San Francisco,” said Shure.

    Source:Al Jazeera

  • UK: Science Museum show charts robots’ 500-year history

    {New London exhibition features more than 100 objects to create world’s most significant collection of robots ever shown.}

    Step into the latest exhibition at London’s Science Museum, and you will be instantly welcomed by an animatronic baby.

    With his moving arms and blinking eyes, this incredibly realistic mechanical human is a bewildering – if not unsettling – sight.

    And that’s one of the goals of the museum’s new show looking at 500 years of humanoid robots: to chart their evolution and explore our reaction towards them throughout history.

    “Robots trouble us,” curator Ben Russell tells Al Jazeera.

    “When you see a robot you’re reading a lot into it as a human. If they are very lifelike, you don’t really know what is the source of their being,” he continues.

    “It troubles us, but it fascinates us, as well.”

    With more than 100 creations on display, the exhibition is the most significant collection of humanoid robots ever shown, according to the Science Museum in the UK capital.

    Among the highlights are a 16th-century automaton monk designed to pray – the oldest object in the show – and a silver swan, built in 1773 by a Belgian clockmaker who also invented roller skates.

    Others, such as the loom, which brought industrialised weaving to the 19th century and put thousands out of work, enable guests to discover the social and technological context of robots – just as many jobs in modern factories have been replaced by machines

    “Five hundred years of history makes you realise that there has always been uneasiness around robots,” Al Jazeera’s Jessica Baldwin, reporting from the show, said.

    “Today’s fear about driverless cars or mechanical nurses are nothing new.”

    The exhibition runs until September 3.

    Source:Al Jazeera

  • Syria hanged 13,000 in Saydnaya prison: Amnesty

    {Syrian government executed thousands of prisoners in mass hangings at Saydnaya prison, says rights watchdog.}

    As many as 13,000 people were hanged in five years at a notorious Syrian prison near Damascus, Amnesty International has said, accusing the government of a “policy of extermination”.

    Titled “Human Slaughterhouse: Mass hanging and extermination at Saydnaya prison,” Amnesty’s damning report, released on Tuesday, is based on interviews with 84 witnesses, including guards, detainees, and judges.

    It found that at least once a week between 2011 and 2015, groups of up to 50 people were taken out of their prison cells for arbitrary trials, beaten, then hanged “in the middle of the night and in total secrecy.”

    The report said: “Throughout this process, they remain blindfolded. They do not know when or how they will die until the noose was placed around their necks.”

    Most of the victims were civilians believed to be opposed to the government of President Bashar al-Assad.

    “They kept them [hanging] there for 10 to 15 minutes,” a former judge who witnessed the executions said.

    “For the young ones, their weight wouldn’t kill them. The officers’ assistants would pull them down and break their necks,” he said.

    Amnesty said the practice amounted to war crimes and crimes against humanity, and were probaby still taking place.

    Thousands of prisoners are held in the military-run Saydnaya prison, one of the country’s largest detention centres located 30km north of Damascus.

    Amnesty accused the Syrian government of carrying out a “policy of extermination”, repeatedly torturing detainees and withholding food, water, and medical care.

    Prisoners were also raped or forced to rape each other, and guards would feed detainees by tossing meals on to the cell floor, which was often covered in dirt and blood, the report said.

    {{‘Hidden, monstrous campaign’ }}

    A twisted set of “special rules” governed the facility: detainees were not allowed to speak and must assume certain positions when guards entered their cells.

    “Every day there would be two or three dead people in our wing … I remember the guard would ask how many we had. He would say, ‘Room No 1 – how many? Room No 2 – how many?’ and on and on,” said Nader, a former detainee whose name has been changed.

    After one fierce day of beating, Nader said, 13 people died in a single wing of the prison.

    One former military officer said he could hear “gurgling” as people were hanged in an execution room below.

    “If you put your ears on the floor, you could hear the sound of a kind of gurgling,” said Hamid, who was arrested in 2011.

    “We were sleeping on top of the sound of people choking to death. This was normal for me then,” he told Amnesty.

    According to the report, the bodies were taken away by the truckload to be secretly buried in mass graves. Their families were given no information about their fate.

    Amnesty has previously said that more than 17,700 people were estimated to have died in government custody across Syria since the country’s conflict erupted in 2011.

    The figure of 13,000 deaths in a single prison, therefore, is a marked increase.

    “The horrors depicted in this report reveal a hidden, monstrous campaign, authorised at the highest levels of the Syrian government, aimed at crushing any form of dissent within the Syrian population,” said Lynn Maalouf, deputy director for research at Amnesty’s Beirut office.

    “The cold-blooded killing of thousands of defenceless prisoners, along with the carefully crafted and systematic programmes of psychological and physical torture that are in place inside Saydnaya prison cannot be allowed to continue,” she said.

    An investigation by the United Nations last year accused Assad’s government of a policy of “extermination” in its jails.

    The UN estimates that more than 400,000 people have been killed and millions have fled their homes since the conflict began with anti-Assad protests.

    Source:Al Jazeera

  • Thousands of Roma ‘made homeless’ in France in 2016

    {More than six in 10 Roma families forcibly evicted as persecution against community rises, civil rights groups report.}

    More than 10,000 Roma were forcibly evicted by French authorities last year, with most ejections taking place during the cold winter months, according to a new report.

    The European Roma Rights Centre and the Ligue des droits de L’Homme (Human Rights League of France) said on Tuesday that at least 60 percent of Romani families in the country were forced to leave their dwellings.

    The majority of the recorded evictions took place without a court decision and, in most cases, adequate alternative accommodation was not offered to those made homeless, the groups said in a joint report.

    “France’s policy of ethnically targeted evictions creates cycles of repeat evictions and forced removals,” the report said.

    “It is also a significant squandering of financial and administrative resources. It is not only a morally bankrupt strategy, but one that is not in the best interests of taxpayers, whose contributions could far better be deployed to invest in social assessments and sustainable solutions for housing.”

    Almost 3,000 Roma were forced from their camps between October and December, a 17 percent increase from the previous quarter.

    “Many Roma were evicted multiple times in 2016,” the report said. “This unsustainable practice only worsens deep poverty and neglects the underlying housing problems.”

    Between 15,000 and 17,000 Roma live in poor conditions with little access to water and electricity in makeshift, illegal camps across France, according to the country’s national census and NGOs.

    Authorities often cite sanitary reasons for dismantling the camps.

    Catrinel Motoc, anti-discrimination campaigner for Amnesty International, told Al Jazeera: “We have repeatedly called on the French authorities … to put an end to forced evictions and take a series of measures that would enable Roma to benefit from their right to adequate housing and not to be discriminated [against], as guaranteed by numerous international and regional human rights obligations that France ratified.”

    In June 2016, several organisations and agencies – including the Council of Europe and the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights – warned local authorities across the continent to provide Roma with “sustainable” housing, saying that children were at particular risk of trauma and social isolation because of evictions.

    {{Racist attacks}}

    In addition to being made homeless, Roma often face discrimination.

    “Many incidents of hate speech and cases of discrimination against Romani people were reported,” the groups said, which confirmed the need for policy “to address the plight of a stigmatised and deeply impoverished population to ensure … equal access to basic services”.

    Tuesday’s report highlighted several racist attacks, including one in December against Jewish and Roma at the Anne Frank nursery school in an eastern suburb of Paris, Montreuil.

    In an act of vandalism, “Juden verboten” (Jews forbidden) and “Sales Juifs et Roms” (Filthy Jewish and Romani people), were found painted on the front gate of the Anne Frank nursery, the report noted.

    Between 10 and 12 million Roma are estimated to live in Europe, with most in eastern parts of the continent.

    With ancestral roots in India, the Roma migrated to eastern Europe in the 10th century and have been persecuted throughout history.

    After the fall of the Soviet Union and the break-up of Yugoslavia, many travelled west, seeking to escape poverty and discrimination.

    In 2010, the European Union criticised France over a crackdown on illegal Roma camps launched by then-President Nicolas Sarkozy.

    In the same year, thousands of Roma were deported to Romania and Bulgaria from France.

    Up to 17,000 Roma live in makeshift camps across France

    Source:Al Jazeera

  • Somalia presidential vote at Mogadishu airport

    {Somalia’s MPs are due to elect the country’s president at the heavily guarded airport complex in Mogadishu, as the rest of the capital is not safe.}

    Traffic has been banned, schools have been shut and a no-fly zone imposed over Mogadishu to prevent attacks.

    Despite this, suspected militant Islamists fired mortar rounds close to the venue on Tuesday night.

    Somalia, marred by religious and clan conflict, has not had a one-person one-vote democratic election since 1969.

    That vote was followed by a coup, dictatorship and conflict involving clan militias and Islamist extremists.

    The elections are seen as part of a lengthy and complex process to help the East African state rebuild its democracy and achieve stability.

    More than 20,000 African Union (AU) troops are stationed in Somalia to prevent militant Islamist group al-Shabab from overthrowing the weak government.

    Over 20 candidates are vying to become president, with the top three proceeding to a second round of voting and the top two from that round going forward to a third and final vote.

    The election hall is a converted aircraft hangar, and is packed with MPs, reports the BBC’s Ferdinand Omondi from the venue.

    President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud is standing for re-election and analysts say he is likely to be one of those who goes forward to the later rounds.

    The airport is viewed as the most secure site and voting was moved there from a police academy because of growing security concerns.

    On Tuesday evening, suspected Al-Shabab militants launched a series of attacks, with two mortar rounds fired close to the venue where the voting venue.

    Residents in Arbacow village outside Mogadishu say jihadists attacked an AU base there.

    Al-Shabab has a presence in much of the southern third of the country and has previously attacked the Somali parliament, presidential palace, courts, hotels and the fortified airport zone.

    At least 19 politicians, as well as many civilians and soldiers, have been killed in its assaults.

    Wednesday’s security measures include a ban on flights to and from Mogadishu airport.

    Correspondents said most schools and offices remained open on Tuesday but people had had to walk to reach their destination.

    Analysts say holding the election in the airport environment may also reduce the possibility of vote buying or other corruption in the election process.

    The aircraft hangar is crowded with MPs ready to vote
  • South African’s Jacob Zuma deploys troops to state address SONA

    {South Africa’s President Jacob Zuma has ordered the deployment of about 440 troops to maintain law and order in parliament for his annual state of the nation address on Thursday.}

    Opposition parties have condemned the decision as a “declaration of war”.

    Previous addresses by Mr Zuma in parliament have been marred by protests and brawls as opposition MPs demanded his resignation.

    Mr Zuma has been dogged by corruption allegations for more than a decade.

    South African President Jacob Zuma will give his state of the union address on Thursday

    Source:BBC

  • Ivory Coast special forces mutiny over pay in Adiake

    {An elite unit of soldiers in Ivory Coast has mutinied, firing into the air at their base in the south-eastern town Adiake, near the border with Ghana.}

    Residents have stayed indoors and shops and schools have closed.

    The Ivorian special forces, who report directly to the president’s office, have accused their commanders of stealing part of their salaries.

    It comes a month after regular soldiers staged a mutiny over pay and conditions.

    “Gunfire began earlier in the special forces’ camp and then the town began panicking as armed soldiers left the barracks,” a high school teacher told the Reuters news agency.

    The BBC’s Alex Duval Smith in the main city of Abidjan says the special forces number up to 800, are rarely seen in public and are considered loyal to the government.

    A delegation from the chief of staff’s office has flown by helicopter to the base to negotiate with the commandos, she says.

    Local media reports one soldier as saying that he has received only $80 (£64) of his $400 monthly salary.

    Adiake is home to a maritime base that trains commandos and provides coastal surveillance.

    Last month, the government agreed to the demands of the other mutinous soldiers, some of whom were former rebels who backed President Alassane Ouattara.

    But the payout has angered other segments of the military, raising fears of a resurgence of the violence seen during Ivory Coast’s 10-year civil war, which ended in 2011.

    Members of the special forces are rarely seen in public and considered loyal to the government