32 years after one of the darkest chapters in human history, the sons of key figures associated with that bloodthirsty regime, namely Jean-Luc Habyarimana and Antoine Mukiza, son of Protais Zigiranyirazo, think that Rwandans are dumb and have forgotten, forgotten the crimes, forgotten the victims, forgotten the truth, they are mistaken.
What we are witnessing is not simply personal defense of family legacy, but a coordinated attempt to rehabilitate the image of their parents, deeply implicated in the genocide. From Europe, narratives linked to the former Akazu network, the inner circle surrounding Juvénal Habyarimana, are being revived and repackaged. This effort seeks to whitewash history, dilute responsibility, and ultimately erode accountability.
Any attempt to portray Agathe Kanziga as a victim and innocent during the genocide against the Tutsi is not only misleading, but it is a denial of well-documented history.
Far from being a bystander, she was one of the most powerful figures within the regime. As a central member of the Akazu, her influence extended into political, military, and propaganda structures that enabled the genocide.
Kanziga, nicknamed “the mother of Satan,” was closely linked to the notorious hate RTLM radio station, which did not merely inform, it incited. Broadcasts explicitly called for violence, directing ordinary citizens to kill, transforming hate into coordinated mass murder.
The genocide did not happen spontaneously. It was planned, financed, and executed with precision. Key figures such as Théoneste Bagosora, Mathieu Ngirumpatse, and Félicien Kabuga were part of a network that mobilized resources and militias, including the Interahamwe.
Meetings held as early as 1993, such as one in Gisenyi, were aimed at strengthening this machinery, increasing financial support, and preparing for what would become a systematic extermination campaign.
Agathe Kanziga even issued the order to assassinate Prime Minister Agathe Uwilingiyimana, one of the first high-ranking victims of the genocide, because the Prime Minister opposed the campaign of mass massacres.
The claims now being circulated by Antoine Mukiza and Jean-Luc Habyarimana are not grounded in evidence. They are part of a broader effort to rewrite history, one that relies on misinformation, selective memory, and the dangerous assumption that time erases truth.
It does not.
Kwibuka is not just about mourning, it is about vigilance. The truth of what happened in Rwanda in 1994 is not negotiable. It is documented, testified, and preserved through the voices of survivors and the weight of historical evidence.
Attempts to distort that truth are not only an insult to the victims, they are a threat to collective memory and to the principle of accountability itself. In the end, truth does not fade. It endures.
No amount of revisionism will change glaring facts.
Leave a Reply